moneyplus
- 27 Jun 2005 18:57
This one hit the markets running today. Despite negative publicity it was well supported so I jumped in for a small holding--anyone else joining in?? I am hoping for a good run up before the shorters get going.
PapalPower
- 07 Oct 2006 11:57
- 196 of 346
http://news.moneycentral.msn.com/provider/providerarticle.asp?feed=FT&Date=20061006&ID=6084392
According to Jonathan M. Winer, a Washington attorney at Alston & Bird LLP who has closely monitored the WTO action, the legislation could well exacerbate the problems the US has already has with the WTO.
"To the extent that the legislation eliminates foreign competition for activities that remain lawful in the U.S., such as online betting on state-licensed horseracing, or state-licensed casino gambling that meets federal guidelines, there's no doubt it raises WTO issues," he said.
PapalPower
- 07 Oct 2006 18:06
- 197 of 346
cynic
- 07 Oct 2006 20:00
- 198 of 346
PP .... the Washington attornies and everyone may ultimately prove that the US "is breaking the law", but it is likely to be a long time coming to court and of course much longer until there is a definitve result and all appeals finished .... in the meantime, many of these internet gambling companies will be long finished
janetbennison
- 08 Oct 2006 08:13
- 199 of 346
looks like the buyers in us are looking to take over online gaming business in the us. There could be quite a lot of action over the next few weeks. Look at the news in sunday times online out today. sportingbet have been approached by quite a few companies. If the gaming companies get taken over in us. Then the new rules and regulations with not affect us. Time for a cup of tea. Have a nice sunday everyone.
janetbennison
- 08 Oct 2006 15:09
- 200 of 346
news just come out 2.45 uk government draws up plans for online betting report.
janetbennison
- 09 Oct 2006 08:13
- 202 of 346
that does mot surprise me now it has dropped down to this current level.
cynic
- 20 Oct 2006 11:11
- 204 of 346
my money would go to Numis ..... but then my money would not be in PRTY anyway!
HARRYCAT
- 20 Oct 2006 11:19
- 205 of 346
I think the thing that is saving PRTY from collapse is the fact that it has big cash reserves, even allowing for the $250m write down for lost U.S. business.
IMO it's has got to acquire a bigger market share, so maybe it is seeking targets???
The 23p must be a projected valuation based on the remaining 15% of it's business, much the same way as SBT was revalued.
M or A has got to be the way forward.
axdpc
- 20 Oct 2006 18:03
- 206 of 346
With the money taken off the table during float, the founders can easily setup an US online gambling operation - if they are willing to face US revenue authority scrutiny and pay US taxes.
Anyone know the current PRTY cash reserve per share? Thanks.
axdpc
- 20 Oct 2006 21:14
- 207 of 346
"Online gambling group Partygaming has said that restructuring its business after pulling out of the US will cost it about $250m (133m)." (BBC Business)
Why?
bonfield
- 23 Oct 2006 09:17
- 208 of 346
it's a goodwill write off, (intangibles) not a cash loss.
TANKER
- 23 Oct 2006 11:14
- 209 of 346
buy this should be 40p ,
rpaco
- 24 Oct 2006 16:40
- 210 of 346
The recent results look very good on the non USA business how many other companies have gains of 158% in turnover in a quater. Obviously you can di anything with the figures and they are trying to be seen in the best light, but compares to SEO's board they are supersonic genii (or geniuses)
rpaco
- 24 Oct 2006 16:44
- 211 of 346
Tanker well I bought SE38 instead
http://uk.warrants.com/services/quotes/details.php?code=SE38 (This link thing looks very wrong. )
rpaco
- 24 Oct 2006 16:46
- 212 of 346
Sorry about my dyslexic fingers
Harry6
- 25 Oct 2006 17:25
- 213 of 346
15 million PRTY shares bought after the bell tonight at 29.23.
axdpc
- 26 Oct 2006 13:37
- 214 of 346
For all companies in which we invest, we have to ponder seriously whether the company and its staff (especially the managements and executives) will not act against, sacrifice or ignore the interests of ordinary shareholders for the benefit of themselves and large shareholders.
Small shareholders without access to insiders suffer from many extra risks and penalities.
cynic
- 26 Oct 2006 13:42
- 215 of 346
i know i keep saying this, but be aware that a buy of any size can very easily be someone closing a short position ..... this will apply especially with the likes of PRTY and SBT and CPW where there are some huge short positions in place