bosley
- 20 Feb 2004 09:34
Oilywag
- 04 Sep 2006 16:55
- 19606 of 27111
Now that's very interesting. That trade of 1.95m shares was shown on the screen at around 8.40am this morning but at 4.1p. When I used the refresh button, it disappeared off the screen and the volume of shares traded dropped by that amount.
It now appears on the screen as a trade at 3.89p. What's the explanation?
Anyone out there cleverer than Pooh Bear?
The oily one
Tonyrelaxes
- 04 Sep 2006 21:26
- 19607 of 27111
I briefly popped into an ASDA, Watford just now.
I found MadPad's Braeburn Organic Apples from NZ in loose-fill bags (sealed with a bit of a knot of sellotape!). No mention of Mater-Bi, or anything else about the packaging, on the bag. Only the usual guff about origin, storage, addresses etc. Plus a badge of approval from the BioOrganic Assoc (or something like that).
Sounds like MadPad's pommes might be part of an ongoing limited trial - now where have I heard that before?
Do you think Novamont and their shareholders will but up with being w*nk*d about for nearly 2 years with trials?
(Bit tongue in cheek - but expresses some of our frustration!)
PS - no sign of "Mixed pepper Salad" as in page 19 of the presentation I listed earlier today. Another limited trial?
hlyeo98
- 04 Sep 2006 21:40
- 19608 of 27111
SEO will slowly dwindle to 2p by the end of the year
garyble
- 04 Sep 2006 21:47
- 19609 of 27111
Novamont broke even in 2002, T/O of 33m Euro and 100 employees.
Novamont founded in 1990, so 12 years to break even!
Also:
"packaging was used for organic food products, in the British chain stores Sainsbury's and Tesco"
and
"Novamont increased the production capacity at its Terni Factory, from 8000 to 20,000 tonnes/year"
So SEO appears to be on a faster track in terms of production, perhaps because of the focus on higher volume products.
garyble
- 04 Sep 2006 22:23
- 19610 of 27111
hlyeo98 - 04 Sep 2006 21:40 - 19608 of 19609
I hope so mate as I sold 320,000 at 3.9p so would be great to get the cahnce to re-buy at 2p....If only I were so lucky!
Tonyrelaxes
- 05 Sep 2006 00:17
- 19612 of 27111
No mention of -
-the 70% power saving
-the lower operating temperature and it's possible benefit to the food within.
-the extended shelf life (possibly because of the above).
-works on Starpol!!! and possibly other degradable, starch derived plastics
Maybe WRAP's area of concern is purely packaging materials and processes.
Maybe the 2 new SEO "Interim" Managers will sort out these presentational poiints.
Maybe...
Maybe...
I'm tired. Good night.
Mad Pad
- 05 Sep 2006 07:52
- 19613 of 27111
Morning all.Tony I dont think your bag was Mater-bi..After all if Sainsburys are telling us all about it on the bag I would have thought ASDA would also be promoting their green credentials,at the very least it should have said "compostible" ,if not what's the point.
robinhood
- 05 Sep 2006 10:25
- 19614 of 27111
Plse correct me if i am wrong but i heard that WM is having a conference on sustainability that will be co-hosted by SEO. Surely WM will not require SEO as a co-host if there was not something in the imminent pipeline?
oblomov
- 05 Sep 2006 13:21
- 19615 of 27111
Co-hosted with Tetra-pak, I think Robin
details here:-
http://bnpevents.com/PS/2006/SPF/index.htm
cynic
- 05 Sep 2006 13:43
- 19616 of 27111
SEO needs all the positive exposure it can muster ..... and that will probably be insufficient
boldtrader
- 05 Sep 2006 14:10
- 19617 of 27111
Oblo SEO listed as being present at the event. cheers.
garyble
- 05 Sep 2006 16:40
- 19618 of 27111
For what its worth:
Partner Host: Tetra Pak
Co-Host: Stanelco
Worrier
- 05 Sep 2006 17:26
- 19619 of 27111
SEO have all the contacts at high level...........just spending cash without any deals being announced. Would like to know what is going on behind the scenes. If the major supermarkets and packaging houses suspected they might go under, it would surprise me if they would wish to be associated with SEO today -- but they are and none of those predicting gloom can deny that.
Would the packagers and supermarkets keep moving ahead with trials and appearing to endorse the SEO intellectual property if there was a wiff of them being ridiculed or losing credibility by association?
That is just one reason I strongly suspect SEO will come through this cashflow crisis, but SEO continue to surprise me, they'll do it again I'm sure.
......a little worried
Worrier
- 05 Sep 2006 17:29
- 19620 of 27111
Garyble
I hope you get the opportunity to buy in again for the rise. With my day job, I would not be around to catch any announcements in time to repurchase.
blackdown
- 05 Sep 2006 19:02
- 19621 of 27111
There are no fundamentals to drive the share price, just speculation. Supermarkets probably couldn't care less whether SEO survives or not. They know that if the company goes under, another organisation will buy what's left for a song and will exploit whatever is there to be exploited.
If this happens, the shareholders will end up with nothing as per Marconi (and others).
Don't fall into the trap of thinking that just because the share price is low it represents value for money.
cynic
- 05 Sep 2006 19:19
- 19622 of 27111
at last! someone elkse who is talking sense about this total crap company
hewittalan6
- 05 Sep 2006 19:43
- 19623 of 27111
Another thread
Old news but the odd quote I haven't heard before. Nowt that new but worth a look.
Alan
garyble
- 05 Sep 2006 20:44
- 19624 of 27111
Alan,
I find the first para somewhat misleading. Nice to know that SEO may have 50 conversions for salad packing lined up, but this was not the initial intention of GS and seen as a less complex affair to tray-lidding which would yield the greater unit return.
Seems to me that there is still an issue with GS tray-lidders.
EDIT:
The writer states 1.5m pa. revenue from the 50 units, which equates to 30,000 pa each, so if they are correct, the simpler salad baggers do command an equivalent license fee.
explosive
- 05 Sep 2006 21:57
- 19625 of 27111
Just like to say I've delivered that box of Tetley.....