overgrowth
- 06 Oct 2003 22:47
beemer2
- 29 Jul 2007 17:32
- 1970 of 2037
COME ON IAN AND DO EVERYBODY A FAVOUR AND BAN THE PRAT SO THIS BB CAN GET BACK TO NORMAL
cynic
- 29 Jul 2007 17:39
- 1971 of 2037
beemer ... no need to squelch; just ignore as i do ..... there are couple of similar idiots on VIY thread
proteus
- 29 Jul 2007 18:07
- 1972 of 2037
Well well 10 B showing your true colours now aren't you.
David10B
- 29 Jul 2007 21:12
- 1973 of 2037
Come on beemer2 give your true reasons whjy you want me banned, if you indeed know what truth means.
Show me one false word or statement made against anyone. You just want to rope the suckers into COH---no more no less.
Proteus, you bet and more to come if need be.
Ever heard up stirring up a hornets nest.
siralex
- 29 Jul 2007 21:52
- 1974 of 2037
Vicky Pollard eat yer heart out - Yeah but no but yeah !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
beemer2
- 29 Jul 2007 21:57
- 1975 of 2037
I AM NOT THE ONLY POSTER WHO BELIEVES YOU SHOULD BE BANNED IT IS TIME YOU STOPPED BEING ALLOWED TO MESS UP THREADS WITH YOUR ILLITERATE AND MORONIC POSTS
sniffer
- 30 Jul 2007 00:08
- 1976 of 2037
I am really surprised that moneyam have allowed a renowned loony to continue posting.(David10B) He has been banned from other BBs many many times and his main issue with COH seems to be that he sold out way too soon. Sad sad individual.
sniff
IanT(MoneyAM)
- 30 Jul 2007 07:17
- 1977 of 2037
david,
I have allowed you to post negative comment, just as I have allowed others to post positive commnent - I have repeatedly had to intervene on this thread on both sides. You are no longer posting negative comment on this stock, you are simply posting about fellow posters. This is not acceptable. This is your last warning, and I will remove your access should you continue along this line.
Ian
beemer2
- 30 Jul 2007 09:49
- 1978 of 2037
Ian
Thanks for your intervention and hopefully a step in the right direction
David10B
- 30 Jul 2007 09:53
- 1979 of 2037
Fine IAN then what about the sniffer post above?
The name calling and personal abuse did not start with me read back and see for yourself.
I am a decent civilised person but there are limits_____-
This BB under your moderation seems to approve the implications that one have to be a loony to call shares in the right direction.
I now formally object to the continued statement that I have been banned from other BB, as I have not, if you allow such crap to appear here then I demand of you that you post proof.
Similarly with posters such as beemer2 and Adieh who like the big bully boy babies they are run to you every 5 minutes wanting to get me banned---I want to know why they want me banned---yet they dont give you any justifiable reason save that I have called their share right bang on all the time.
If you want a pretty usless rampers' BB without constructive comments, that I know for a fact have saved investors money by not buying COH( I have emails and Emails from three people who bought COH at 49p at what AHIEH had to say about Will Currie buying etc)---then I suggest that you do in fact ban me!
For looking back over this thread its all pure unsubstantiate hype
EG-------AdieH - 31 Aug 2006 08:48 - 450 of 1977
Exceptional results and up 5% already today, were heading for 30p barrier now... this is a little beauty... 2-3 years we could be at 1.50...
NOW WHAT DID ADIEH BASE THAT ON????
YOU ARE THE MODERATOR--PLEASE ASK HIM, AS THE WAY THINGS ARE FOR COH RIGHT NOW WITH ALL THE NEW COMPETITION AND LACK OF PRIME SITES, COH WILL BE LUCKY TO BE AROUND IN 3 YEARS TIME
David10B
- 30 Jul 2007 09:57
- 1980 of 2037
AND FOR THE RECORD I HAVE NEVER OWNED COH SHARES AS AN INDIVIDUAL.
I CAME HERE LOOK FOR INFO AS NO DOUBT MANY OTHERS DO.
WHAT I FOUND HERE WAS A CLEAR ATTEMPT TO STIFFLE FREEDON OF EXPRESSION BY THE VESTED INTERESTS---AND THAT SMACKS OF PRE WAR GERMANY.
NOW IF I WAS WRONG IN MY ASSESSMENT OF COH WHICH TOOK MANY HOURS OF RESEARCH AND NOT JUST EMPTY GOBBING I WOULD BE THE FIRST TO GO----WITH TAIL BETWEEN MY LEGS.--------BUT I AM NOT SWRONG, I AM RIGHT!
beemer2
- 30 Jul 2007 10:09
- 1981 of 2037
Ian
He is once again posting about fellow posters after you advised him not to
David10B
- 30 Jul 2007 10:11
- 1982 of 2037
its call a general reference under freedom of speech
beemer2
- 30 Jul 2007 10:15
- 1983 of 2037
Free speech does not give you the right to be abusive
cynic
- 30 Jul 2007 10:16
- 1984 of 2037
10B .... you are an ass .... you make a rod for your own back, so do not be surprised if it used!
David10B
- 30 Jul 2007 10:19
- 1985 of 2037
Abuse???? look back my cretinous friend--you started the abuse and now cry as the heat is too much.
Cynic, please crawl back to your hole were your talents are obviously much appreciated.
David10B
- 30 Jul 2007 10:20
- 1986 of 2037
Ps its my baCK AND ITS VERY STRAIGHT AND MORE THAN CAPABLE OF CARRYING YOUR PATHETIC S%%T..
beemer2
- 30 Jul 2007 10:24
- 1987 of 2037
Ian
It seems your advice has not dampened Davids resolve in rubbishing this BB
David10B
- 30 Jul 2007 10:24
- 1988 of 2037
Cynic upon reflection lets get these things in the open and have IAN to moderate rather than ban yopu for personal abuse.
I am more than prepared to go to the limit---why do you call me an ass?, is it because I am smarter than you and can outwit you as you chose to hide behind charts etc. I express an honest personal opinion.
Do you have a problem with being open or what, or do you feel endanagered by my presense here?
You could always squelch me, but like the rest you keep coming back---Why?
David10B
- 30 Jul 2007 10:26
- 1989 of 2037
Is it rubbish to call a dog share in the right direction and help save investors grief---is that what you mean?
As for resolve, you aint seen nothing yet buster.