bosley
- 20 Feb 2004 09:34
StarFrog
- 13 Sep 2006 16:06
- 19804 of 27111
dawall - commiserations. I see you feel so strongly about this that you felt it worth repeating repeating.
LOL
garyble
- 13 Sep 2006 16:12
- 19805 of 27111
Dawall,
These are indeed trying times, and possibly the darkest hour.....who knows?!
IF they are finalising a couple of contracts, and IF the contracts are for say a minimum of 60,000 tonnes pa. of Starpol, there should be a step-change in the SP as they should be able to put some meat on the bone in the ensuing RNSs.
It has taken at least 9 months to get to the stage of signing a couple of contracts for the MMPs, so in the grand scheme of things I don't believe it has been totally cocked up, but the management has shown itself to be somewhat green, but so have some investors.
IF SEO survives the next 4 weeks, it should go on to deliver on its promises.
aldwickk
- 13 Sep 2006 18:07
- 19806 of 27111
Don't worry about a rights issue not being taken up, Thatwittalan and the lemmings who follow him will buy them.
hewittalan6
- 13 Sep 2006 18:25
- 19807 of 27111
It may come as a shock to you, but some people, not you obviously, have a mind of their own. It may also come as a shock to you that some people can read the simple phrase "I would not recommend anyone to buy into these" that I have put on many posts.
It may come as a shock to you, that others do their own research and make up their own minds.
It will come as no shock to anyone that your magnificent mastery of repartee goes no further that little boy name calling and that once again you manage to post without a hint of any research or input onto the subject, that you have no agenda anywhere except to cause as much trouble as possible, try against all the odds to be superior to everyone else, and resort to the silly little infants device of name calling.
It will also come as no shock to anyone who frequents these boards, or any others that I really could not care less what you or anyone else may think. Everyone is free to read what is written, make up their own mind, do their own research and, for all I care, decide to put all their money wherever they want. Just as I do with mine. If you have something to say about the share, that is worth saying and not simply repeating something you read on an AOL sainsburys blog, then say it. If you wish simply to badmouth people, wait until tomorrow and you can do it in the playground with your chums.
Life is too short to be bothered with inbred little ignoramous like you, so if you post something that is relevant, fine. If not, than i shall happily ignore it and let everyone else work out what most people already know about you.
hewittalan6
- 13 Sep 2006 18:28
- 19808 of 27111
For everyone else;
I think it is now safe to say that the mysterious post close trades we have seen for the last 3 days is someone selling off. The share price movement makes me fairly certain of that, in my own mind, but what do other (sober) posters think?
Alan
tweenie
- 13 Sep 2006 18:51
- 19809 of 27111
Being a stupid lemming, i'll have to agree with you.
But theen again WTFDIK, as i'm soooo stupid (with my own money) I still hold loads of these shares.
:o)
antofelli
- 13 Sep 2006 18:51
- 19810 of 27111
Nothing has changed, but every day we get closer to the finance call but as well the contracts that we know "are being finalised" and other positive targets. Being long for a long time and never been scared by the trader mentality. When the traders knock the price down I see that as a buying opportunity. I know the traders had big margins on seo so far because of the uncertainty wich surrounds seo`s negotiations. I`m confident pretty soon that uncertainty will be all cleared off.
halfamil
- 13 Sep 2006 20:41
- 19811 of 27111
Alan. Couldn't agree more. Non holders just knocking for fun. What mentality would cause someone to visit a share thread that they don't hold? It amazes me. I think the imminent contracts will follow the official green light for Starpol 300, then things will move very quickly.
Either that or the Board are a gang of crooks who are risking a prison sentence.
Seems unlikely.
aldwickk
- 13 Sep 2006 21:24
- 19812 of 27111
hewittalan6 ,
He trys so hard to be witty and clever, but in fact he is only a pompous self opinionated little man, the Captain Mainwaring of moneyam. what a wanker.
Oilywag
- 13 Sep 2006 21:33
- 19813 of 27111
adwickk
What a very well reasoned, intellectually superior and rational post!
The oily one
hewittalan6
- 13 Sep 2006 21:35
- 19814 of 27111
Evening Oily!!
About those trades. Sells, d'you think??
Alan
explosive
- 13 Sep 2006 21:48
- 19815 of 27111
Aquasol still looks like its doing well.......
Oilywag
- 13 Sep 2006 21:53
- 19816 of 27111
Evening Alan
Really don't know. Interactive had all of the large trades at close this week as buys. I think somebody with level two would have a better idea.
The oily one
aldwickk
- 13 Sep 2006 22:27
- 19817 of 27111
Stanelco PLC
Daily Commentary
Our system posted a SELL CONFIRMED today. The previous BUY recommendation was made on 11.09.2006 (2) days ago, when the stock price was 3.6500. Since then SEO has fallen -4.66% .
SELL-IF is confirmed by a black candlestick with a higher open and a lower close. The selling price is taken as the previous close ( 3.6500 ) according to the Rules of Confirmation.
The recent bearish pattern leading to the SELL-IF signal is confirmed today. The market is poised for bearish action. Though the market opened higher today, the days activity created a black candlestick that closed below the previous close. This is one of our valid bearish confirmation criteria.
The slight failure of the previous BUY signal is currently confirmed, too. We closely monitor the performance of the signals, but a few shots missing the target slightly are inevitable when you deal with the stock market. However, such signal failures are more unlikely for higher rated stocks.
We hope that you sold this stock . Probably you realized a small loss but it is better to cut the losses short. Your important benchmark today was the previous close. You were supposed to watch the session carefully, feel its bearish tendency despite the higher opening and sell your shares after making sure that the prices stay below the previous close.
If you sold, keep away from this stock until the confirmation of a new BUY-IF signal unless there is not an emergency warning. What to do if you did not already sell? Maybe, you did not have time to follow the session or you simply delegated the delicate job of confirmation to us. Well, it is a bit late, but not too late. You may still find suitable prices for selling your shares in the following sessions.
The market is an inviting one for short-sellers. Risk lovers may now go for short sale. The market is already moving on the side of shorts ignoring the confirmed bullish patterns.
oblomov
- 14 Sep 2006 07:23
- 19818 of 27111
aldtwit,
'The previous BUY recommendation was made on 11.09.2006 (2) days ago'
What has changed behind the scenes in two days to turn this to a sell from a buy?
I stopped looking at British Bulls a long time ago - automated, no human input, rubbish.
I'll stick my neck out and say the SP will close slightly higher than it opens today.
aldwickk
- 14 Sep 2006 07:41
- 19819 of 27111
oblomov,
aldtwit, now were did you get that from ? was it from me when i posted heisatwittalan. not very original of you was it.
tweenie
- 14 Sep 2006 08:15
- 19820 of 27111
Wednesday, 13 September 2006, 23:21 GMT 00:21 UK bbc news
Supermarkets 'not green enough'
Tesco is introducing biodegradable carrier bags
Supermarkets are not doing enough to help all their customers make environmentally-friendly choices, a consumer group has warned.
The National Consumer Council (NCC) is calling on the UK's eight leading supermarket chains to do more to cut waste and source more food locally.
They should also set targets to have 100% recycled packaging, it says.
None of the companies did well in the group's report though Morrisons and Somerfield got the lowest ratings.
Waitrose was the best performer in the survey, done by the Food Commission, which visited two branches of each store - one in the north east and one in the south east of England.
However it was found to stock organic strawberries which had been flown from New Zealand.
Progress acknowledged
WHAT NCC WANTS
Reuseable shopping bags
Fewer plastic carrier bags
Year-round locally-sourced food
Less out-of-season produce flown to UK
Targets of 100% recycled packaging
Last week Sainsbury's announced 500 of its 10,000 own-brand products now has compostable packaging, while Tesco is introducing biodegradable bags and rewarding customers for bringing their own reusuable bags and boxes.
The NCC report acknowledged supermarkets' efforts to improve their approach to green issues.
But it urged them to make environmentally-friendly options the norm for all shoppers, rather than simply the more ecologically aware.
"We all need to understand that food is the typical household's number one contributor to climate change," NCC chairman Lord Whitty said.
"By throwing away ten billion carrier bags each year and transporting carrots from Egypt and strawberries from New Zealand, we hit the environment hard."
Morrisons said it was making progress in areas covered by the report and said it recognised the challenge it faced.
"We intend maintaining our momentum through our programme of continuous improvement," a spokesman said.
on another note: 120 days for fda approval of s'pol 3000 should be up by now?
any ideas
mtwallit
- 14 Sep 2006 09:21
- 19821 of 27111
was on BBC News this morning about 7:30 - link to story
would have thought may have given boost to those who are in this business?
:-)
http://www.ncc.org.uk/cgi-bin/kmdb10.cgi/-load821879_nccviewcurrent.htm
cynic
- 14 Sep 2006 09:42
- 19822 of 27111
still grasping at (biodegradable plastic) straws?
tweenie
- 14 Sep 2006 09:55
- 19823 of 27111
better than drowning. lol