Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

stanelco .......a new thread (SEO)     

bosley - 20 Feb 2004 09:34

Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&SiChart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&Si

for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm


hewittalan6 - 13 Sep 2006 18:28 - 19808 of 27111

For everyone else;
I think it is now safe to say that the mysterious post close trades we have seen for the last 3 days is someone selling off. The share price movement makes me fairly certain of that, in my own mind, but what do other (sober) posters think?
Alan

tweenie - 13 Sep 2006 18:51 - 19809 of 27111

Being a stupid lemming, i'll have to agree with you.
But theen again WTFDIK, as i'm soooo stupid (with my own money) I still hold loads of these shares.

:o)

antofelli - 13 Sep 2006 18:51 - 19810 of 27111

Nothing has changed, but every day we get closer to the finance call but as well the contracts that we know "are being finalised" and other positive targets. Being long for a long time and never been scared by the trader mentality. When the traders knock the price down I see that as a buying opportunity. I know the traders had big margins on seo so far because of the uncertainty wich surrounds seo`s negotiations. I`m confident pretty soon that uncertainty will be all cleared off.

halfamil - 13 Sep 2006 20:41 - 19811 of 27111

Alan. Couldn't agree more. Non holders just knocking for fun. What mentality would cause someone to visit a share thread that they don't hold? It amazes me. I think the imminent contracts will follow the official green light for Starpol 300, then things will move very quickly.

Either that or the Board are a gang of crooks who are risking a prison sentence.

Seems unlikely.

aldwickk - 13 Sep 2006 21:24 - 19812 of 27111

hewittalan6 ,

He trys so hard to be witty and clever, but in fact he is only a pompous self opinionated little man, the Captain Mainwaring of moneyam. what a wanker.


Oilywag - 13 Sep 2006 21:33 - 19813 of 27111

adwickk

What a very well reasoned, intellectually superior and rational post!

The oily one

hewittalan6 - 13 Sep 2006 21:35 - 19814 of 27111

Evening Oily!!
About those trades. Sells, d'you think??
Alan

explosive - 13 Sep 2006 21:48 - 19815 of 27111

Aquasol still looks like its doing well.......

Oilywag - 13 Sep 2006 21:53 - 19816 of 27111

Evening Alan

Really don't know. Interactive had all of the large trades at close this week as buys. I think somebody with level two would have a better idea.

The oily one

aldwickk - 13 Sep 2006 22:27 - 19817 of 27111

Stanelco PLC
Daily Commentary


Our system posted a SELL CONFIRMED today. The previous BUY recommendation was made on 11.09.2006 (2) days ago, when the stock price was 3.6500. Since then SEO has fallen -4.66% .

SELL-IF is confirmed by a black candlestick with a higher open and a lower close. The selling price is taken as the previous close ( 3.6500 ) according to the Rules of Confirmation.

The recent bearish pattern leading to the SELL-IF signal is confirmed today. The market is poised for bearish action. Though the market opened higher today, the days activity created a black candlestick that closed below the previous close. This is one of our valid bearish confirmation criteria.

The slight failure of the previous BUY signal is currently confirmed, too. We closely monitor the performance of the signals, but a few shots missing the target slightly are inevitable when you deal with the stock market. However, such signal failures are more unlikely for higher rated stocks.

We hope that you sold this stock . Probably you realized a small loss but it is better to cut the losses short. Your important benchmark today was the previous close. You were supposed to watch the session carefully, feel its bearish tendency despite the higher opening and sell your shares after making sure that the prices stay below the previous close.

If you sold, keep away from this stock until the confirmation of a new BUY-IF signal unless there is not an emergency warning. What to do if you did not already sell? Maybe, you did not have time to follow the session or you simply delegated the delicate job of confirmation to us. Well, it is a bit late, but not too late. You may still find suitable prices for selling your shares in the following sessions.

The market is an inviting one for short-sellers. Risk lovers may now go for short sale. The market is already moving on the side of shorts ignoring the confirmed bullish patterns.



oblomov - 14 Sep 2006 07:23 - 19818 of 27111

aldtwit,

'The previous BUY recommendation was made on 11.09.2006 (2) days ago'

What has changed behind the scenes in two days to turn this to a sell from a buy?

I stopped looking at British Bulls a long time ago - automated, no human input, rubbish.

I'll stick my neck out and say the SP will close slightly higher than it opens today.

aldwickk - 14 Sep 2006 07:41 - 19819 of 27111

oblomov,

aldtwit, now were did you get that from ? was it from me when i posted heisatwittalan. not very original of you was it.

tweenie - 14 Sep 2006 08:15 - 19820 of 27111

Wednesday, 13 September 2006, 23:21 GMT 00:21 UK bbc news

Supermarkets 'not green enough'

Tesco is introducing biodegradable carrier bags
Supermarkets are not doing enough to help all their customers make environmentally-friendly choices, a consumer group has warned.
The National Consumer Council (NCC) is calling on the UK's eight leading supermarket chains to do more to cut waste and source more food locally.

They should also set targets to have 100% recycled packaging, it says.

None of the companies did well in the group's report though Morrisons and Somerfield got the lowest ratings.

Waitrose was the best performer in the survey, done by the Food Commission, which visited two branches of each store - one in the north east and one in the south east of England.

However it was found to stock organic strawberries which had been flown from New Zealand.

Progress acknowledged

WHAT NCC WANTS

Reuseable shopping bags
Fewer plastic carrier bags
Year-round locally-sourced food
Less out-of-season produce flown to UK
Targets of 100% recycled packaging

Last week Sainsbury's announced 500 of its 10,000 own-brand products now has compostable packaging, while Tesco is introducing biodegradable bags and rewarding customers for bringing their own reusuable bags and boxes.

The NCC report acknowledged supermarkets' efforts to improve their approach to green issues.

But it urged them to make environmentally-friendly options the norm for all shoppers, rather than simply the more ecologically aware.

"We all need to understand that food is the typical household's number one contributor to climate change," NCC chairman Lord Whitty said.

"By throwing away ten billion carrier bags each year and transporting carrots from Egypt and strawberries from New Zealand, we hit the environment hard."

Morrisons said it was making progress in areas covered by the report and said it recognised the challenge it faced.

"We intend maintaining our momentum through our programme of continuous improvement," a spokesman said.


on another note: 120 days for fda approval of s'pol 3000 should be up by now?
any ideas

mtwallit - 14 Sep 2006 09:21 - 19821 of 27111

was on BBC News this morning about 7:30 - link to story
would have thought may have given boost to those who are in this business?
:-)

http://www.ncc.org.uk/cgi-bin/kmdb10.cgi/-load821879_nccviewcurrent.htm

cynic - 14 Sep 2006 09:42 - 19822 of 27111

still grasping at (biodegradable plastic) straws?

tweenie - 14 Sep 2006 09:55 - 19823 of 27111

better than drowning. lol

automatic - 14 Sep 2006 10:23 - 19824 of 27111

i must say that my confidence is slowly ebbing away with this SEO,you read all the time how super/markets must go greener with their packaging, SEO are meant to have the awnser, sales= 0, wrap 100 great for fast food, sales=0.
ONE VERY PEED OFF PUNTER just had to have a moan

robinhood - 14 Sep 2006 10:44 - 19825 of 27111

With the green issue now snowballing surely signing of contracts HAS TO BE around the corner

soul traders - 14 Sep 2006 10:45 - 19826 of 27111

Halfamil, your question, "What mentality would cause someone to visit a share thread that they don't hold?"

For the record, some of us like to talk about shares we don't hold because we wish to contribute constructively to the discussion - which for me is half the fun of using the BB. Personally, I welcome non-holders and contrary views on any thread I create, as it helps me better to weigh up the pros and cons of a potential investment.

I realise, however, that some people just use the thread to abuse others and I think we're all agreed that we can do without that.

oblomov - 14 Sep 2006 10:56 - 19827 of 27111


soul traders - your contributions are always constructive, sahreholder or not - its the 'told you so, they're going bust, you're stupid to still be holding' mentality of some non-shareholding contributors that is hard to understand and irritating.

aldwickk - apologies, typo. Meant to type 'oldtwit'.
Register now or login to post to this thread.