for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm

Morning all,

Good to hear about the contracts in the works. What spoils the party for me at present is that nothing is known about the fundraising. If more stock is issued, I'd expect that to drag on the SP - unless the contracts are likely to add significantly to revenues in the very short term and the costs of starting production are not too capital intensive, meaning that the likely dilution is limited.

On the fundamentals side, SEO would have to raise revenues considerably to turn the kind of profit needed to justify the current SP - it will be interesting to see how big a step in that direction they take when the contracts are finalised.

It seems to me that the co is waiting to see how the contracts turn out before announcing the fundraising; quite understandable if they feel the contracts will be of sufficient size to bolster the SP.

All IMHO - I continue to watch with interest.

Interesting - I was just reading the last post which was a rather offensive post from one individual (you know who you are) targeted at another individual. Seems to have completely disappeared now. Don't know if the poster removed it (I would hope so) or the MoneyAM team.

Surely, regardless whether you are long, short, or not even an investor in this stock you have the right to say what you want since this is a public access bulletin board. If people take offence to contrary opinions then that is their problem, not the person with the opposing view.

Nuff said.

concur, though I confess to being a pain myself ..... that said, personal or self abusers can stay on ADVFN!

being an outsider and not party to stockexboysgirls antics..surely the point of posts is to provide informative information - not slag each other off? healthy disagreement or witty arguments by all means - not sewer mentality :-)

u repeat my sentiment, though my posts on this thread at least, amuse few other than myself!

it indeed amuses VERY few other.....

good! .... though that said i am truly sorry that so many of you are doing your bollocks, even if much of the pain is self-inflicted

I am not in pain- have been in and out of this quite a few times and although with current sp my latest batch does not look pretty I am still overall in the plus. Reckon there will be enough egg on your face once contracts come in to prepare scrambled eggs for all the holders....

Theres no gain without pain, cynic!

rotten tomatoes will do very nicely thanks! ..... and oblomov, not true at all!

5 million more buys than sells and still it drops how the hell can you win in this game, think I will go away next week. A bit of good news for when I get back please.

perhaps 5 million short positions being closed at a tidy profit

around 4-5 weeks ago we were told that contracts with 2 parties were being finealised regarding starpol , i know that contracts take time but 5-6 weeks in final stages ? knowing SEO are cash strapped are the companies SEO are finalising these contracts with waiting until seo have to practicly give them starpol before they sign, seems they have SEO over a barrel, ( just thinking out loud), but any views welcome

Strong smell of burning here.

automatic agree with you and can't think who in the right mind would now finance them with only 7 weeks cash left, no contracts, no Greenseal installations. I also think the fact that nothing comes back from investor relations speaks volumes, almost as if they have shut up shop and are now awaiting the inevitable. One thing for sure though and that is issuing an RNS saying that contracts are in the process of being finalised and then not delivering (if that tuns out to be what happens) should be considered a very serious offence!

it would not be an offense; merely that the parties failed to reach agreement; nothing signed = no contract

automatic/dawall

You're both talking out you backsides, as usual. We were actually told 7 days ago that the contracts 'are in the process of
being finalised.' I'm sorry if this offends the more sensitive posters amongst us, but you are a couple of right prats as far as I'm concerned, deliberately winding people up with misinformation.

See RNS of 8th. September.

http://production.investis.com/seo/regnews/rnsitem?id=1157695280nRNSH6695I

Oblo,

Beat me to it. Although I think some posters' frustration does occasionally tend to skew the facts a bit.

I bought some more this morning, realising about 12% on the tranche I sold a couple of weeks ago, I was hoping for 25% which I would have got had I held on till this evening.....never mind, at least I've made a gain {on number of shares}.

Time is very near to hear what the future has in store for SEO!

Oblomov
I used the word finealised instead of advanced, i do apologise for that, but i don't think i am a prat for putting my thoughts on this BB, i know you and others think the sun shines out of SEOs backside, i did once, i was quite confident, but not any more, i still hold SEO only because i have left it to late and not worth selling. I suggest if you think i am a prat (as always) then you best not read what i post, not trying to wind anyone up and i don't think name calling does any good at all,all you had to do was correct me
regards

Just thought I'd add my thoughts, for what they are worth.
Firstly when i read the word finalised in the same sentence as contracts, it always conjures in my head the vision of two fat cat decision makers shaking hands and saying, "My people will call your people to do the legal bit". Rightly or wrongly, its what I think probably applies here. SEO and client both want it and they have agreed. Its the quirky legal bits that are going backward and forward, not bad selling or management.
Remember we are talking about licensing agreements, not a one off capital purchase, so legally it is a minefield. Also if it is with our cousins across the pond then there will be negotiations on jurisdiction to contend with and they are always a barrel of laughs.
On the issue of somewhat heated debate (of which i am as guilty as anyone), I don't think a single genuine poster on here has any issue with any valid or reasoned comment, be it pro or anti. The real issue, and what has caused tempers to flare is the tone, and the self proclaimed taunting.
if the only post anyone can make is to say....Ooohh hasn't the sp dropped, then they deserve the robust replies. If people make posts that are designed to confuse The facts or simply bait others, then they become a valid target.
Please lets keep it real. I take no joy in seeing anyone other than the taxman lose money, I cannot understand why anyone would, but if you do, keep it to yourself, or be prepared for a lot of posters spending several decades reminding you how wrong you were, if SEO do fulfill their potential.
Alan