Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

stanelco .......a new thread (SEO)     

bosley - 20 Feb 2004 09:34

Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&SiChart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&Si

for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm


garyble - 18 Sep 2006 12:07 - 19935 of 27111

Oily,

According to your research, when did SEO notify the FDA?

Oilywag - 18 Sep 2006 12:24 - 19936 of 27111

garyble

I was not told when they submitted Starpol 3000 to the FDA for approval, but was told five weeks ago that it would take another 12-16 weeks for approval which now means 7-11 weeks.

I do know that there are tests being conducted in the US with food packers using Starpol 3000.

The oily one

automatic - 18 Sep 2006 13:20 - 19937 of 27111

hewittalan6
forgive me for going against the stream on this BB, but do you not think your cricket pal could be feeding you a load of old twoddle,( Asda are definitely on, the decision is made,) imo i feel that if this was the case SEO would have put out an RNS pretty dam quick to stop themselves from going under, unless the rumour is true about ASDA and SEO? also if the deal was on again in my opinion SEO would have no trouble in getting money from institutions,
ALAN this is not in anyway having a dig at you, regards

PATISEAR - 18 Sep 2006 13:35 - 19938 of 27111

Who says they are having trouble????

garyble - 18 Sep 2006 13:40 - 19939 of 27111

Thanks Oily.

oblomov - 18 Sep 2006 13:48 - 19940 of 27111



Some interesting facts and figures here:-

http://www.advfn.com/p.php?pid=ukfinancials&symbol=L%5ESEO

automatic - 18 Sep 2006 13:49 - 19941 of 27111

PATISEAR
LOOK AT THE SP?

automatic - 18 Sep 2006 13:51 - 19942 of 27111

.

jaguar121 - 18 Sep 2006 14:09 - 19943 of 27111

Anyone got any info as to whats happening to SEO's factory in Wales.Has it been built yet , what are they going to produce etc ???

cynic - 18 Sep 2006 14:15 - 19944 of 27111

if it hasn't been built yet, don't even bet that it will be until the company at least has its future secured

hewittalan6 - 18 Sep 2006 14:30 - 19945 of 27111

No Offence taken, auto.
I always put the caveats in my posts reference any news he gives me, because yes, he could be having a laugh at my expense. I doubt it though, and much of what he has told me has been confirmed by other sources.
Given his position he really should know the state of play as well as anyone in the world, and he usually shys away when asked directly for info he does not feel comfortable about
I doubt SEO would need to RNS the Asda stuff, cos it has been RNS'd many times.
I think the point was more that the final problems had been overcome and rollout was here. SEO are not the same SEO that used to RNS absolutely everything.
Alan

Haystack - 18 Sep 2006 14:34 - 19946 of 27111

Soon to be well under 1p and not a moment too soon.

waveydavey - 18 Sep 2006 15:00 - 19947 of 27111

hate to say it , but i hoper it does drop until ends of week. then I get paid. hope theres good news from Friday onwards. H6, Tweenie, i'll take your advice and not buy any, but will set funds aside -should there be good news and a run of shorters closing.

PATISEAR - 18 Sep 2006 15:04 - 19948 of 27111

I currently have 10k of SEO @ 3.7ppp average, and have a further 10k to invest.
What price would I need to buy in order to average 3ppp.

automatic - 18 Sep 2006 15:11 - 19949 of 27111

PATISEAR
Don't even think about it, until you see orders 100% genuine orders, IMHO

Oilywag - 18 Sep 2006 15:17 - 19950 of 27111

PATISEAR

10K at 2.5228p per share would give you 396,396 shares added to your existing holding of 270,270 shares makes a total of 666,666 shares for 20k which is 3ppp.

Go back to school and ask for your money back. You was robbed.

The oily one

PATISEAR - 18 Sep 2006 15:21 - 19951 of 27111

Oilywag
Chrres.
State school. You get what you don't pay for.
Don't like all them sixes. Scary.

hewittalan6 - 18 Sep 2006 15:40 - 19952 of 27111

waveydavey,
I gotta say it, just for clarity and I know you already know it, but, never take anyones advice on anything to do with shares on a free BB. I think you are wise, but please never do anything because I or anyone else thinks its a good idea. Any of us could be very wrong.
Even as I type about my buddy, the bailiffs could be changing the locks on the SEO head office. Even as Ragtag & Bobtail spout their taunts, Martin Wagner could be shaking hands with the WM president. None of us know - its all a gamble.
Alan

soul traders - 18 Sep 2006 15:54 - 19953 of 27111

PATISEAR, I don't know how much money you have to invest (and you may have just won 150 million in the Euromillions lottery, in which case, feel free to ignore my advice as you can clearly afford to lose 10 grand), but it sounds as if you'd be in danger of concentrating your investments too heavily into one stock if you held 20,000-worth of SEO.

The potential for any share to disappoint investors cannot be overstated, all the more so given that many people thought that SEO was a hot tip at 15p, and it still hasn't stopped sliding!

There are plenty of good stocks out there which could also produce excellent returns, so it's worth biding your time and doing some research.

Sermon over - I wish you the best of success with your stockpicking.

PATISEAR - 18 Sep 2006 16:13 - 19954 of 27111

soul traders
Cheers for Sermon.
I am waiting for Funding News and Shorters dumping.
Got out last year @17pps with profit. Back in again @3.7 av.
All the Best to Holders.
Register now or login to post to this thread.