i can only find all the old ones. is censorship at large or do i just have a glitch in my/mam sortware?

superrod, I can't find any other TAD discussion threads either on MAM so it's not a glitch in your software. I found the following message on another BB Tad thread which might explain why!

ainusoph - 30 May'04 - 23:18 - 69983 of 69987


jesus wepped

the tadpole threads have been removed on a competitors bb after I got in a brawl with the websites management.

to make matters worse I have lost thousands upon thousands of well thought out professional ramps.

come on team we better go into overdrive on here to ensure we see 84p again.

i expect you can take the day away from your yaught tomorrow dollarhoggar to help the cause and don't worry I will bring out another 60 or so of my aliases that I haven't been using for a little while

:-))

ainusoph

Bullshare.

Is this the way you control your BB then?
You were told by many to get rid of Ollie since day one.
Are you now prepared to spoil it for the rest of us?

M

ta Legins

i have been mailed the last few posts on the most popular tad thread and it would seem mam are fed up of the bickering wrt tad. hardly a reason to zap the bloody lot. i ruck with posters all the time. its what bbs are about ( i stress share differences only ). the fact that mam have had more complaints about tad postings might have a correlation with the fact that tad is one of the most popular threads/shares on a lot of bbs.

i have posted on occasion in the heat of the moment stuff that is not really in my nature. there must be a better way :O(

Feel free to start a new TAD thread. The last thread became unreadable and full of abuse. Our patience was stretched to the limit and may be we have been too soft letting back in previously banned posters.

As a result of yesterdays postings we issued a number of warnings, and removed some accesses. No doubt you will spot who is not around.

Our Content standrds are very clear and the two tadpole threads went way over the limit from a number of posters/postings.

The Standards

You must comply with the spirit of the following standards as well as the letter. The Standards apply to each part of any Contribution as well as to its whole.

Contributions must:

Be accurate where they state facts

Be genuinely held where they state opinions

Comply with applicable law in any country from which they are posted

Contributions must not:

Contain any material which is defamatory of any other person;

Contain any material which is obscene or offensive;

Infringe any copyright, database right or trade mark of any other person;

Be likely to deceive any person;

Be made in breach of any legal duty owed to a third party such as a contractual duty or a duty of confidence;

Be likely to harass, upset, embarrass, alarm or annoy any other person;

Be likely to disrupt our service in any way;

Give the impression that they emanate from us where this is not the case;

Advocate promote or assist any unlawful act such as (by way of example only) copyright infringement or computer misuse;

We caution against giving out any personally identifiable information (such as private email address, telephone number or home address) online. This information can easily be used for illegal or harmful purposes.

Please also be mindful of your fellow subscribers and treat them with the respect and courtesy they deserve.

thanks......that explains the loss of one thread but NOT the others

Mike,

Fully agree, well done!