Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.
  • Page:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

PDX - Are ADVFN employees involved in the ramp? (PDX)     

Ghostman - 24 Oct 2003 11:58

Many people including myself have had their right to post on the ADVFN BB removed in recent days for nothing more than rubbishing the outrageous claim of what PDX are about to do. The information if true has to be illegal as it is not in the pubic domain.
ADVFN seems to be supporting the poster who are making these outrageous claims and i can therfore only assume they are also incolved in the pump and dump.
The FSA have been informed!!

jfwinvestments - 24 Oct 2003 15:18 - 2 of 77

Very interesting


I bought PDX lol


I also wrote a reasoned piece on why the AFN market capitalision at 6 times annual turnover did not make a lot of sense and it simply never made it to the bulletin board.

Andy - 24 Oct 2003 15:26 - 3 of 77

Ghostman,

LOL!

I think you will find that the information IS in the public domain, if you know where to look that is!

Otherwise, go visit the company, like I did.

The PDX unit is revolutionary and innovative, and will be a winner if they are able to commercialise it, IMHO.

Ghostman - 24 Oct 2003 17:01 - 4 of 77

sorry we dont all have access to the companies directors, so the information is not in the pub domain.
This is a classic ramp buy the people who have a rep for doing it many times before to many companies that are now broke!!

Gausie - 24 Oct 2003 17:20 - 5 of 77

Ghostman, name names.

You come on here ranting on about "people who have a rep for doing it many times before to many companies that are now broke!!" and your sly insinuation is that I have been involved in such shenanigans. Which is complete bollocks. Are you trying to tar me with the brush you and hoot used years ago?

In the meantime you've spent years ramping Recall and you choose to swim with the likes of Ashley James. In fact, you're 'thick as thieves' with him. How apt.

little woman - 24 Oct 2003 17:46 - 6 of 77

I bought PDX a while back after taking a look at the company web site: http://www.pursuitdynamics.com/default.asp and was impressed with what I saw.

But as soon as I made a profit I sold.

What I don't understand is why they don't actually manufacture & market the product they say they have developed themselves. My understanding is they have this wonderful system which has a multiple of uses (& huge potential markets), but they are still looking for someone else to manufacture & market it for them - I think this is the problem. If I was a interested manufacturer, I would wait until the company went bust, and buy the system from the liquidator for next to nothing, and not have to pay a royalty.

PDX needs to take it on themselves initially and manufacture & market the products and when the order book gets to large for them to cope with, then look for someone else to handle the expansion and take it on.

Ghostman - 24 Oct 2003 17:49 - 7 of 77

Gausie
How wrong you are, I do not know Ashley James, I met him very breifly once years ago and have no contact with him.
I am disgusted at the treatment many people have recieved by ADVFN and as for you know who, he deserves everything he has coming his way ;-)))

Ash1ey James - 24 Oct 2003 17:57 - 8 of 77

Crap company with no prospect. Simple, just a pump (pun)and dump like all those mining stocks and Lloyds Insurance companies. Short the a*se out of it



Dominic Simpson - 24 Oct 2003 19:19 - 9 of 77

pommy
pump and dump has to be better than pump and forget to dump?
iam pumping to 5 and then dumping
DS

little woman - 25 Oct 2003 20:04 - 10 of 77

Make sure you don't wait too long to dump - if you read the auditors report in the interim results they mention that the company at the time had only enough money to keep them going a year. The directors believe that during that time they would obtain contracts OR WOULD (more likely) RAISE MORE FINANCE. I wonder what that'll do to the share price!

Ghostman - 26 Oct 2003 09:16 - 11 of 77

They have raised finance, and the companies brokers exercised opions to give the co more money. That dont sound healthy.
Now they have to market the product which aint gonna gome free. never seem a person marketing shit for free.
Some people are gonna get badly hurt on this stock.
The funnies thing is the main ramper told some heavy hittes were coming in on friday morning and hey did arrive and the shares went up. But someone has had a sniffa round and the shares were all bought on margin!!!
Very dangerous when you start believing your own lies and trying to finance it thru margin!!! OUCH!!!!!

sniffer - 26 Oct 2003 10:15 - 12 of 77

SAD TOSSER

DUPLEX - 26 Oct 2003 13:04 - 13 of 77

The last time I saw a load of hot air going through a pump and into water I was sat in the bath - the curry the night before was amazing. You'll have to be Ffaster off the mark if you want to catch the next upward moving share. This aint it. Sounds like a wonderful shorting opportunity.

IanT(MoneyAM) - 27 Oct 2003 08:05 - 14 of 77

Ghostman,

I have removed your last post as it contained words that some people may have found offensive.

Ian

Pommy - 27 Oct 2003 08:08 - 15 of 77

I was only describing ADVFN as a bunch of C--ts, which we all know they are....and the rest?!!!! (BTW sorry for having 2 IDs, it took you ages to remind me of my password to my normal one!!!)


Gausie has now found it necessary to start post peoples names on ADVFN.
Thats ADVFN for you, bunch of c--ts who have banned over 20 posters this last week for pointuingout the truth about PDX.

jfwinvestments - 27 Oct 2003 08:22 - 16 of 77

I am baffled by all this from you on these bulletin boards.

Your ranting is not helping your arguement - indeed it is damaging your case.

If you don't want to invest in this stock surely, the thing to do, is to state your case, coherently and logically, supported by facts and then leave others to their fate.

I would be very grateful if you would tell me, in clearand considered terms just what you think is the problem with investing in PDX and then leave me to decide what to do.

Pommy - 27 Oct 2003 08:33 - 17 of 77

Unfortunately despite ****** and ******* claims I havent been ranting.
They just got a bit upset when I pointed out Evil K had sold 100k PDX and had put his money into Corac. Contrary to their bizarre claims i have not posted heaps of things under multiple names and spent most of yesterday (******) found it necessary to start posting my real name on ADVFN) watching football with friends and not anywhere near a computer.
The sad truth is they are using all the method they can to pump up this stock, which is very much a jam tomorow story.
If they know anymore about PDX than me, they are insider trading , and I believe someone has already made a complaint to the FSA about them (no not me before ******* gets all snooty).
We've all seen ******** do this before and hardly a single promise delivered.
I am very uncomfortbale abour ******** relationship with this company and also with Ron Trenter (see first PDX RNS) who was also a director of Oasis Healthcare a company ********* tried to get all his 'mates' into.

Ive had a good load of money out of this ramp and still have a few shares left in for fre.
But I object to being attacked for pointing out something that is public domain information, but might not be in ******** or ******* interests.

I hope they dont make too many Margin buys to convince the sheep there are still big punters buyers. I have no idea where PDX are going and I care very little. As I said Ive had my money and have a free ride on a few more. Its the attacks that piss me off!!.

PS I would also like to add i hardly know Ashley James so if he has an axe to grind with ******** and ******* thats their business and nothing to do with me!!

ricardopage - 27 Oct 2003 08:51 - 18 of 77

If it's so easy to make with no moving parts any small engineering company could make this.
They should have prototypes zipping up and down the Thames by now.
Smells a bit fishy to me.

jfwinvestments - 27 Oct 2003 08:52 - 19 of 77

Well, I don't know about the rights and wrongs of all this but I do know that you would get a better hearing if you moderated your language.

You are simply undermining your own case and bring discredit to yourself.

A sound arguement presented in temperate language, however frustrated you are, will tend to do better for you.

About PDX.

It seems like a reasonable , if speculative, investment to me. People mught be wise though not to commit too much to this one business.

Pommy - 27 Oct 2003 08:54 - 20 of 77

******, another ID, you must make up most of the investment BBs between yourself and ******. Do you also go around threatening people when you investments go sour?

little woman - 27 Oct 2003 09:04 - 21 of 77

You are right jfw.

I've been caught out in the past with a company like this one. I bought because they had a excellent product, and promises of future deals, & expansion. Unfortunetley the companies that were supposed to do the deals with, did nothing and waited until eventually theBankers pulled the plug. Then they got the bits they wanted form the liquidators for next to nothing (I know because I'm still getting dividend payments from the proceeds a couple of years later - but I've lost most of my original investment.)

Yes buy in, but don't stay in too long - get out as soon as you are in profit, and certainly don't risk anymore than you are prepared to lose. This is a share that it is too easy to be "greedy" with the profits.

If this company makes the big time, you can re-invest then. I think some of the comments are because many people realise that it is not a sure thing that this company is going to succeed and being "good friends" they are trying to make others aware of the risks. (Is this too nice a way of saying it!)
  • Page:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Register now or login to post to this thread.