for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm

Driver, You might be right but do not think so somehow. Anyway I may just as well hang on for the mo as 2p/s is hardly creating a pos. cashflow.

The existing patents ALONE should be worth more than that

Well I've just re-bought realising a 30% increase in holding...and really hope it won't be 30% of nothing at the end of the day.

Certainly some frantic activity and probably quite a few stop-losses triggered.

Any lower and I will get religion!

this reads not just like trying to catch a falling knife, but more like trying to catch a falling guillotine blade

Diametrically opposed views welcome here. A virtually silent Company contrasts with a fevered sell on the Market. A 26% fall is significant in my view and means that something is known by one part of the Market that we punters don't ( YET!) know.
Could there be some resignations....?
or
Could we be seiing a cash crisis - if so, why didn't they raise cash when the ASDA trials were going (and still going I presume)

This company appears to be run by Silent Order Morons.

Without more info what can one deduce?

The Graph tells it all.........the Market always knows.

Any diametrically Opp views?

cynic - more like a band saw actually!

Robinhood, the existing patents are worth what customers will pay for the goods.

. . . he says, gnomically.

Just back in and totally mystified.
One point. The RNS with SEO attached was nothing to do with SEO, so whoever said it was a smokescreen????
Buys outdoing sells again and the SP falls!! There must be a big seller in the background, but they must know something we do not, for I can find no trace of any fresh news to uphold this shift.
Alan

just for the record ...... i have wrongly poked fun or even blackened Shares Mag by suggesting that they were strong advocates of SEO ..... history shows that they were back in 2004 when sp was then 5p and rising ..... they then recommended to sell at 12p in May 2006 and even ran a theoretical short from about August, which they then closed (prematurely!) to crystalise a profit.

As for "more buys that sells today", i shall repeat what i have said previously ..... is very likely to be bears realising gains, and that does not alter the fundamantals.

Cynic, Shares Mag actually appears to have changed its stance today (or at least they quote the house broker as being very positive). Clearly everyone's copy has been eaten by their dog, which explains the selling.

How many people actually believe house brokers? Surely it must be similar to those who believe in fairies and Father Christmas. It is not often you will see a house broker say 'SELL'! In fact are there any examples?

soul* ..... they quote T&G as being positive, which is not quite the same!

Now still at 2/1.97 11.3MBuy/7.7MSell Could there be a huge unrecorded sell in the background which will go through after hours?
Can anyone with level 2 see why? Or is a crystal ball necessary?

Cynic, didn't I put that in parentheses??!!

Anyway, I'll believe the house broker when confronted with evidence.

A witty post from AD..N

seo has long been a pioneer in the biodegradable world, and aim to become the first company to totally disappear, leaving nothing behind other than a few wealthy directors.

aldwickk
You forgot about us who have had so much fun posting for the last couple of years.

don't forget a dog like Sanctuary went up from 0.5p to over 2p a few months back for a 3 bagger...SEO will bounce back to 8p from 2p...the key is to sell out at 8p and then buy back in when it goes back down to 2p again

interesting to see if there is news or a correction on sp manana

just for info for you chaps ..... average volume for last 3 months is 4 million ..... today's volume of 26 million speaks volumes!

Wonder if anyone had the bottle to "short" this morning?