Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

stanelco .......a new thread (SEO)     

bosley - 20 Feb 2004 09:34

Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&SiChart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&Si

for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm


pinnacle - 29 Sep 2006 10:08 - 20485 of 27111

There are no concerns in Stanelcoland.

All relaxed and news imminent - just irritated at the false rumours being touted.

aldwickk - 29 Sep 2006 10:11 - 20486 of 27111

pinnacle,

In your dreams.

robinhood - 29 Sep 2006 10:14 - 20487 of 27111

I know I am only a "bloody" foreigner , but I was always taught that the word imminent meant -likely to happen soon. Does anyone have a spare dictionary for the SEO board?

pinnacle - 29 Sep 2006 10:15 - 20488 of 27111

My access to information enables me to be comfortable.

So I don't have to rely on my dreams!!

hewittalan6 - 29 Sep 2006 10:15 - 20489 of 27111

Pinnacle,
Are you in a position to reveal your source or substantiate that.
I understand if a public BB is not the place, so feel free to mail me.
Alan

Haystack - 29 Sep 2006 10:18 - 20490 of 27111

There was someone sitting under a cash machine yesterday. He said "can you spare any money for SEO". Had had a box with about 20p in it.

garyble - 29 Sep 2006 10:18 - 20491 of 27111

15m at 1p = 1.5bn shares: or ~2.5bn shares in issue!....Can't see that happening.

maestro - 29 Sep 2006 10:20 - 20492 of 27111

not worried...chilling out with a nice fat cigar

sellsell - 29 Sep 2006 10:21 - 20493 of 27111

pinnacle really hope you are right, to raise 15m at 1p will be a disaster for current shareholders

stockdog - 29 Sep 2006 10:22 - 20494 of 27111

what kind of filter you using, maestro? I bet it's an RF Havana Starpole you're smoking!

Mad Pad - 29 Sep 2006 10:23 - 20495 of 27111

I agree Robinhood.For" weeks" read "many months",I may yet have to update that to "within the year".I am of course referring to "Starpol 3000 approval expected within weeks" from the AGM.

Biscuit - 29 Sep 2006 10:28 - 20496 of 27111

Does anyone know if Starpol 3000 has FDA approval? I just think it's strange that nothing has been announced. Has the trial with the "fast food chain" finished? The RNS's said that the demand in USA was "immense" yet there hasn't been a single order for a single product in the last few months, which I don't understand. Has anybody spoken to Stanelco recently?

Cheers,

Biscuit

Oilywag - 29 Sep 2006 10:29 - 20497 of 27111

From the in depth research I and two colleagues did in the middle of August, our reliable source - insofar as he knew what was happening behind the scenes - told us that FDA approval was 12-16 weeks away.

Now it should 6-10 weeks away - unless they encounter any problems, which they shouldn't as Starpol 3000 is basically Starpol 2000 with the colour taken out of it. Now before anybody with technical information shoots be down in flames, that was a very simplistic description of the main difference between the two products.

The oily one

pinnacle - 29 Sep 2006 10:32 - 20498 of 27111

Have sent an email to you alan.

Have you got it.

tweenie - 29 Sep 2006 10:33 - 20499 of 27111

Having seen greenseal in action and DMOR, I'll sit out and wait. Everyone I've spoken too gives the shrugging shoulders, 'am I bothered answer to the sp fluctuations.
The bottom line is nobody is saying one way or other.....just gossip and ill researched rumour. The only thing clear is SEO want money, are looking at all financial options and will act in best interests of shareholders. So who do you believe?
rideing out the storm..............again for the promise of JAM TOMORROW.
LOL :-))

hewittalan6 - 29 Sep 2006 10:34 - 20500 of 27111

Got it thanks, Pinnacle.
Returned one to you with a brief of my knowledge.
Alan

aldwickk - 29 Sep 2006 10:55 - 20501 of 27111

tweenie ,

" Everyone I've spoken too gives the shrugging shoulders, 'am I bothered answer to the sp fluctuations."


They might be just good poker players.

garyble - 29 Sep 2006 11:10 - 20502 of 27111

Biscuit,

FDA approval is typically a countdown of 120 days {17 wks} from the Food Contact Substance (FCS) notification, which as Oily states appears to have a further 6-10wks remaining. Within the 17wk wait, the FCS can be rejected which it does not appear to have as yet and most likely will run to the full 120 days whereby it will officially attain FDA approval.

The FDA Food Contact Notification (FCN) list was recently updated and includes approvals up to 31/08/06:
http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~dms/opa-fcn.html

The only entry for Stanelco is FCN No: 558

soul traders - 29 Sep 2006 12:49 - 20503 of 27111

Stockdog, re you post 20484: "Raising 15m is perhaps difficult to convince. On the one hand it is considerably greater than their cash burn should be if their promise of imminent contracts is to be believed (and they must be believed to even get started) so the balance must be for expansion;"

Is it not the case that SEO will need a considerable amount of tooling-up for Starpol production, hence the large amount of cash rumoured to be involved in the fundraising. I can't see the company trying to expand by acquisition at a time when everything is otherwise in such a precarious state; if they didn't need the whole amount of cash for continuing (beginning!) operations they would surely wait until they were in a stronger position, in terms of both finances and of the share price, before looking to raise cash for bargain-hunting.

Garypat2 - I'm not a director and don't know much about the rules of authorising share capital, but I am certain that the shareholders would be far more likely to authorise an increase in share capital if the directors were able to go to them at the EGM and say "we have been out on the road and have received undertakings from potential investors covering X million", than if the directors just said "We've got nothing at present but are willing to give it a try; please give us a free hand."

All just idle thoughts; please make up your own minds.

greekman - 29 Sep 2006 12:55 - 20504 of 27111

I would think that the awaited approval for Starpol 3000 is sitting in a tray at the FDA waiting for someone to deal with it.
As with any such state run organization, the wheels of finalization grind almost to a halt.
I know, I worked in similar (government bureaucracy) .You could summit for final approval signature a completed file after working on it for months,and it would sit there for weeks, gathering dust until someone got of their butt and decided to deal with it. Any attempt to push things along was usually met with stonewalling.
If something had been found untoward, we would have heard by now.
No worries on that score.
Register now or login to post to this thread.