bosley
- 20 Feb 2004 09:34
Tonyrelaxes
- 29 Sep 2006 15:33
- 20522 of 27111
blackdown.
Possibly a fair point in other circumstances but you are overlooking that there are Letters of Intent from two separate potential 'partners' (so far). The old 'fear and greed' syndrome should prevent either party being too agressive - unless they are in concert, which I would doubt.
Oily.
Home and just awake after 13 hours on bike following tea on a beach near St Tropez yesterday afternoon. Weather (and amounts of girls' clothing) not so good in west London this afternoon!! No new mobile yet but number should be the same. I'll advise in due course but home number OK - not lost that one!
PATISEAR
- 29 Sep 2006 15:35
- 20523 of 27111
Oilywag
Since the AGM, has the JVP verbal agreement changed somewhat?
At time of AGM SP was 13p.
Oilywag
- 29 Sep 2006 16:02
- 20524 of 27111
PATISEAR
I have no information to say that it has.
The oily one
waveydavey
- 29 Sep 2006 17:13
- 20525 of 27111
pinnacle, oilywag,tweenie,alan6.
If you know anything that will stop my heart fluctuations can you please please
e-mail me. i thank you in advance.
waveydavey999@yahoo.com
maestro
- 29 Sep 2006 17:18
- 20526 of 27111
wavey..hawthorn berries will cure that
tweenie
- 29 Sep 2006 18:11
- 20527 of 27111
WD
with the exception of names, everything I know has been posted on this website.
greenseal is being trialled? outside of asda, starpol is the moneyshot.
Nobody seems too worried about the finance situation except us shareholders.
What more can i add.
hewittalan6
- 29 Sep 2006 18:15
- 20528 of 27111
wd,
I have nothing concrete I can tell you, either on here or by BB that will stop your palpitations!!
While I, and many others, have enough research to make 14 episodes of Panarama, it is not conclusive, and to be totally honest, gets very confusing. The picture is not at all clear, and while I draw very positive conclusions from what i do know, the research I have would likely add insomnia to your heart problems!!
Truthfully, if i had something I could prove beyond doubt, I would post it here. The rest is hearsay. Well informed and very accurate, from those who know the situation much better than I, but hearsay all the same.
The best I can offer, is to say "don't buy, if you cannot afford to lose then you have too much in SEO and watch this space very carefully". It will not rocket off without you, but it will rocket off. While we wait, it may fall further with you!!!
Alan
Technotamed
- 29 Sep 2006 18:59
- 20529 of 27111
I'm in for just 60 worth, at this price its worth a punt and I might make a few hundred profit. If not and it goes down the pan never mind.
kimoldfield
- 29 Sep 2006 19:04
- 20530 of 27111
Technotamed. Pessimist. Only a few hundred profit!! ;o)
kim
Oilywag
- 29 Sep 2006 19:31
- 20531 of 27111
wd
Relax, since doing my research more than six weeks ago, the situation has changed radically and I am no wiser than anyone else on this board. In fact I am just as confused as everyone else.
A lot of the rumours are mere conjecture and frankly grossly misleading designed to cause confusion. Ignore most of it. Which bits you do depends on where you are in this investment.
The oily one
stockdog
- 29 Sep 2006 20:33
- 20532 of 27111
Soul trader - by expansion I meant production, not acquisition, and specifically jv production of Starpol. But if as much as 15m at 1p is needed now, why on earth did they raise only 3.8m in June at 8p, when they must have known how much would be needed for production jv's even if they were unaware of operating cashflow porblems at that stage. Seems verging on negligence to have so miscalculated only so recently. The high need now cannot have arisen only out of events of the succeeding 3 months. I would have thought nearer 8m @ 1p now and more @ 5p (?) in 6 months time when cashflow has stabilised and contracts clearly signed.
sd
bhunt1910
- 30 Sep 2006 13:51
- 20533 of 27111
I suspect that they felt confident of signing contrsct when they raised the cash at 8p and did not want to dilute the sp any more than they had too.
My view is that they miscalculated the time required to get the contracts signed off and found themselves in shit street again.
More examples of niave and inexperienced management playing in the big pond and being taught some harsh business lessons. I had hoped that this new finance director was going to put a bit of backbone in this management team. Time will tell.
My judgement is that they will not go broke, will not get suspended and will get contracts signed in the nick of time to keep them in business - they will then start a long recovery process - similar to what Ashtead have done over the last 3 years when they rose from 3p to 200p - and they should know all about that as the SEO chairman is a director of Ashtead.
maestro
- 30 Sep 2006 14:05
- 20534 of 27111
hmm.. 1.5p to 100p would do for me...nice little 40 bagger
KingKonggb
- 30 Sep 2006 14:25
- 20535 of 27111
In your fecking dreams Maestro!
KingKonggb
- 30 Sep 2006 17:35
- 20537 of 27111
Hey Drivel,
Love a nice dog now and then!!
cynic
- 30 Sep 2006 18:03
- 20538 of 27111
my son tried it on his recent trip to Asia and thought it remarkably tasty.
as for maestro, he needs to improve his basic maths skills as seemingly do the guys at SEO, as do the investors with their rose-tinted glasses ..... 1.5p top 100p is not 40 bagger, but rather 66.66 bagger .... however, as this company is 99% certain not to realise that dream, i guess it doesn't matter much
Technotamed
- 30 Sep 2006 19:20
- 20539 of 27111
I have come to the conclusion that SEO will get the funding from one of the two parties at least and that this is one of the most shorted stocks going. This takes into account the amount of negative posters so I see this as one of the most high risk high reward plays going but timing is difficult.
Also it is a very popular stock and therefore when the funding is announced this stock will rocket.
aldwickk
- 30 Sep 2006 20:24
- 20540 of 27111
It will fall to under 1p, and with the amount of new shares that they will have to issue it will take years for the price to recover.
garyble
- 30 Sep 2006 20:40
- 20541 of 27111
ST,
Finally got round to finding the article re: your post 20516. The article was from Proactiveinvestors:
http://www.proactiveinvestors.co.uk/articles/article.asp?SEO:
"
Stanelco plans to build micro-manufacturing plants in conjunction with partners to supply the starch polymer to consumers. The idea is to charge a technology transfer fee (envisaged to be $1.25 million) to the partner. Both the partner and Stanelco will then co-invest to build the plant, with Stanelco retaining a 70% revenue stake it is anticipated that each plant will contribute 4 million profit per annum. The company is currently negotiating with parties for the construction of 5 micro-manufacturing plants. The total cost estimated to build one 20,000 tonne plant is approximately US $7 million. The key fact to remember here is that the starch business on its own, is a wholly viable entity and does not depend on the success of Stanelcos RF technology."