Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

stanelco .......a new thread (SEO)     

bosley - 20 Feb 2004 09:34

Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&SiChart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&Si

for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm


driver - 05 Oct 2006 12:24 - 20835 of 27111

hlyeo98
If all had gone to plan then 15p would have been cheap, at a 1p it could go either way for what its worth I think it, we will survive to see better days from SEO onward and upwards, Ive said that some where before?

dawall - 05 Oct 2006 12:27 - 20836 of 27111

hlye I agree SHARES MAG IS THE BIGGEST PILE OF CRAP YOU'RE EVER LIKELY TO READ, almost as good as read as TOM BULLFORD'S RED HOT PENNY SHARES!

Tonyrelaxes - 05 Oct 2006 12:29 - 20837 of 27111

Agreed about Board changes due and what could be needed. Also I get the impression a really firm Sales/Negotiating Director would not go amiss.

The Company has great ideas, patents, is innovative in these fields but woefully lacking in resentation and delivery.

Howard White's background was corporate recovery before he got involved with SEO. SEO needs those talents more now than when he arrived!

I agree that due to his connected shareholdings he probably is considered more like the boss of a one man band than just for the duties he purports to carry out.

But what we need is a highly skilled and motivated TEAM with individual abilities covering all diciplines. And more prodding from shareholders!

bosley - 05 Oct 2006 12:31 - 20838 of 27111

greekman, confidant, that was pretty much my point. why not wait until everything has been completed and then release an rns? truly shambolic and very typical of seo. when you consider the ip this company has and the huge amounts it has raised from previous placings, the mess it has created is astounding.
sd, if we're talking about lessons learnt, then for my part i consider seo as a great lesson in not falling in love with a share, that you need to be cold and cynical.

Confidant - 05 Oct 2006 12:38 - 20839 of 27111

it might be that they issued the statement following the slagging by Shares Mag -- not seen the report but apparently says co going bust -- this could be enough to spur the comment

bhunt1910 - 05 Oct 2006 12:39 - 20840 of 27111

I suspect at this moment, SEO are damned if they do and damned if they dont , issue an RNS.

They are currently in a no win situation until they have some positive news to tell.

I want to see details of funding and details of contracts - otherwise I dont want to hear from them

ssanebs - 05 Oct 2006 12:41 - 20841 of 27111

please note that it is Howard White who runs Stanelco from behind the scenes and he is totally to blame for the whole mess, he was advised many times by advisers to do things differently and he did not listen.

WOODIE - 05 Oct 2006 12:47 - 20842 of 27111

the last paragraph in shares today i feel is offence to people that want to invest in the company as it is there money they can do what they want with it but for someone in a respected mag to call people dumb is going under the belt the last paragraph reads to all those that have not seen it " an emergency fundraising will soon take place,but surely no one will be dumb enough to bail them out.the only direction seo is moving downward"

soul traders - 05 Oct 2006 12:50 - 20843 of 27111

Since Shares Mag is still shorting the stock (p43) it's scarcely surprising they said that . . .

tweenie - 05 Oct 2006 12:51 - 20844 of 27111

So is seo going down the pan?
is the 1 a myth?
Yes the board of SEO (or al least some of it are W@@kers, Yes, there are others with vested interests to drive the sp down and buy up cheap. Yes there will be a dilution and possible funding from elsewhere.
But the bottom line is , do you believe seo will come good?
answers on a postcard or fag packet, please.

waveydavey - 05 Oct 2006 12:56 - 20845 of 27111

well , I believe it will recover. Can't see any point in shorting this further.
When SEO release some positive news re these letters of intent then sp will go up
How much? WTFDIK?
depends how much money seo borrows from elsewhere.
2 mm plants will turn this company around PDQ.

Tonyrelaxes - 05 Oct 2006 12:57 - 20846 of 27111

Tweenie
Will come good? Dunno.
Could? Yes,
but changes needed - unless a BIG contract is signed PDQ

foale - 05 Oct 2006 13:01 - 20847 of 27111

1 is a myth..

1p is the reality...


and one expensive lesson of not having a stop loss...

hangon - 05 Oct 2006 13:12 - 20848 of 27111

Makes one wonder if they have a decent product, either. For it seems odd that (even) a so-so product could be nurtured by stupid management - why stupid?, Well, because they bought shares at 3.2p a couple of years ago ( during an earlier slump) and have little to show for it. Has anyone actually seen the SEO products (even a lash-up), or are we relying upon the Execs telling us how good it is?

Well a ( private) fundraising at 0.8p puts the lid on my interest, having invested at 1.6p I feel a whole lot better than folk who invested earlier at douuble-figures (you know who you are).
I think the decent thing to do would be a Rights Issue - at least it would dull the pain of Dilution. Where did the 3.6m go from June'06 fundraising?

Such a shame that UK Execs don't have to pass a test of competance....a bit like a cycling proficiency - at least you believe they knew which way to ride the darn thing, eh? Anyone investing (Institution-wise) will almost certainly want to cast out the rotten core of this operation, so short-term pain but ultimately....?

Arrgh. The wait is nearly over, just a short walk in the morning air and the axeman will have his purse. I hear it will be raining, pity.


dawall - 05 Oct 2006 13:17 - 20849 of 27111

From 17th August Trading Update we were all told

We acknowledge that Stanelco has encountered delays in rolling out GREENSEAL to
the market. The delays have primarily resulted from the limitations of the food
packaging industry to allow access to machines to test the technology in a
factory environment. The Board believes that these delays will not impact on the potential success of the project.'

Contact
Martin Wagner
Chief Executive
02380 867 100


So Greenseal, where is it upto now Mr Wagner?

hlyeo98 - 05 Oct 2006 13:31 - 20850 of 27111

Mr Wagner should resign from his post for giving misleading information - looks at SEO'S sp now. Every shareholder should contact him at above no. and ask for an explanation.

oblomov - 05 Oct 2006 13:38 - 20851 of 27111


Unfortunately explanations dont sign deals.

waveydavey - 05 Oct 2006 13:53 - 20852 of 27111

I think i'll leave for a while . My parting thought.
Many moons ago Mr White talked about plucking the low hanging fruit from the tree.
I'd personally rip the branch off , beat the crap out of him with it , then string him up from a higher branch. Sell off frogpack, and all the other ancilliary crap and push forward s'pol and greenseal.

dawall - 05 Oct 2006 14:03 - 20853 of 27111

wavey davey agree that all the crap like Frogpack needs to go as does the ciggy filter stuff, assuming some one may want to buy it, although I suspect we have been told a load more bullshit here.

oblomov - 05 Oct 2006 14:11 - 20854 of 27111


The ciggy stuff existed before SEO was on the scene - if it had been worth anything significant Biotec would have sold it themselves.
Register now or login to post to this thread.