bosley
- 20 Feb 2004 09:34
dawall
- 05 Oct 2006 14:03
- 20853 of 27111
wavey davey agree that all the crap like Frogpack needs to go as does the ciggy filter stuff, assuming some one may want to buy it, although I suspect we have been told a load more bullshit here.
oblomov
- 05 Oct 2006 14:11
- 20854 of 27111
The ciggy stuff existed before SEO was on the scene - if it had been worth anything significant Biotec would have sold it themselves.
garyble
- 05 Oct 2006 14:18
- 20855 of 27111
Someone asked why sell now having read the RNS: Surely one could sell now and rebuy if the sp is expected to fall. I've managed to increase my holding by 25% by doing just that since it hit ~3.5p.
tweenie
- 05 Oct 2006 14:19
- 20856 of 27111
agree with oblomov and wd.
Seo board have a lot to answer for . Best they wear some armour for the AGM.
Will be attending and will want some proper answers , not promises of jam tomorrow.
dawall
- 05 Oct 2006 14:28
- 20857 of 27111
tweenie do you know when next AGM is likely to be?
Tonyrelaxes
- 05 Oct 2006 14:31
- 20858 of 27111
Biotec knew all about the potential of their ciggy filters and lots of their other IP. But they were restrained by their owner (Koshoggi Industries - not Adnam, his brother) to ignore them and concentrate only on specific products and projects.
When SEO came along the staff pointed out these things and were greatly encouraged by the interest SEO were showing.
Or so we were told by Ian Balchin at the EGM in August last year when he made his 'low hanging fruits' comment that has oft been quoted - and mis-attributed to HW who was not there!
tweenie
- 05 Oct 2006 14:34
- 20859 of 27111
tony.
I stand corrected.
So I'd beat them both up and hang them from a higher branch.
;-)
Tonyrelaxes
- 05 Oct 2006 14:39
- 20860 of 27111
dawall.
Their year ends in 26 days. Based on past performance preliminary figures will be announced at end Feb 07 and AGM late April/early May.
Sounds a long time off.
But I feel we will get an opportunity of attending an EGM very soon. Whether they will accept AOB questions is another discussion point!
Tonyrelaxes
- 05 Oct 2006 14:41
- 20861 of 27111
tweenie
Unfortunatly fruit trees are not renown for their strength and were not used by lynching parties.
garyble
- 05 Oct 2006 14:43
- 20862 of 27111
Could be the announcement was to peg the drop to 0.8p rather than free-fall which could compromise the funding price. The last fund raising price was altered due to movement in the sp.
tweenie
- 05 Oct 2006 14:47
- 20863 of 27111
ahhh.
Tony. I'll have to coat it in s'pol then, give it some extra strength.
Obviously it's environmentaly friendly as well.
Being a concientious individual . A shallow grave under the tree will allow the bearing of more fruit the following year.
Plus , I'll feel a lot better
Tonyrelaxes
- 05 Oct 2006 14:53
- 20864 of 27111
Starpol biodegradable body bags.
Cheaper and green funerals.
Salvation!!!
robinhood
- 05 Oct 2006 14:55
- 20865 of 27111
IF contracts have been delayed due SEO fin. situation and IF the rights issue goes ahead tomorrow with no great hick ups THEN we should get some real news on LOI's immediately thereafter. IF not we have all been taken for a ride
robinhood
- 05 Oct 2006 14:57
- 20866 of 27111
by the way tweenie if you go for a fruit tree , make it a crap apple tree- at least they wud feel at home there
maestro
- 05 Oct 2006 14:59
- 20867 of 27111
9.9 m market cap..if they double the shares it will still be around 20m market cap..very strong stonking buy..5 bagger in 12 months
greekman
- 05 Oct 2006 15:27
- 20868 of 27111
It will be fully dependent on the sp within the next couple of months as to whether I report SEO management to the LSE for consideration of breach of Rules.
In my opinion, 1 misleading RNS can be a mistake, 2 becomes shear incompetence, and 3 or more must indicate intention to mislead. The misleading RNS's must be in double figures by now. Not saying anyone has broken the rules, but there must be sufficient doubt to justify an investigation.
AdieH
- 05 Oct 2006 15:46
- 20869 of 27111
They really have some serious questions to answer... they have a wonderful product with a market screaming out for this technology but they cannot deliver, look at the debactle with BPRG... and don't forget they brought some more new directors in also which have made the situation worse... Think LSE need look into this situation urgently...
dawall
- 05 Oct 2006 15:48
- 20870 of 27111
Greekman I'm there with you on that, you just have to read the countless RNSs and lack of response to investors Qs over the last 2 years. As far as I am concerned they have to deliver the contracts they have talked about alongside the fundraising. I do not want to see the fundraising and some crap comment about contracts still being finalised as we had the latter almost a month ago now. I want to see the contracts.
As soon as I get time I also plan to go through every RNS and pull out what I believe to be either a misleading statement or statements that they have issued which have created excessive hype. Then I will start with the FSA and take it from there but since this is something I have never felt the need to do before I do not yet no what other steps could be taken.
Investors clearly have a case, SEO board have one last chance, lets hope the contracts they have been talking about are significant and still in play!
greekman
- 05 Oct 2006 15:59
- 20871 of 27111
Dawall,
The only reason I have not already contacted the LSE is that I do not wish to make matters worse for SEO via the management team, until I have to. That is why I mentioned a couple of months.
boldtrader
- 05 Oct 2006 16:27
- 20872 of 27111
Sorry to be a bother,been overseas last 12 days,502 posts later, can anyone of you kind fellows give a holder a precised resume as to what the hells going on,thanks in anticipation,and dare i say it,good luck to all holders,i think we may need it!! cheers.