for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm

To summarise Oblos post;
It is not the content that people take offence to (andysmith is a highly regarded poster on here who is not a fan of SEO) but to the tone of posters.
No genuine invester would enjoy the sight of a fellow invester losing vast amounts of money, but some posters seem to delight in it. Your post came accross as that.
Alan

I believed Geoff was from Shares Mag , i only emailed to confirm it to other posters. And i agree with everything he said.

I might buy 20m this morning to knock the sp another 10% ?

So you are not going to cut n paste it?

Geoff Ho has only reiterated my own opinion of SEO senior management's incompetence in basic marketing skills which I have posted here before and have been amply bourn out. He went to great length to spell out that it was his opinion not the magazine's, some of you could obviously not be bothered to read all the sentences.

Had SEO been a task in the Apprentice, the whole board would have been fired for
lack of market research and basic business skills, poor communication and bad management.

Above all they needed to go on an old fashioned Marketing course and learn that sales and product are only two of the necessary attributes in the marketing mix. They obviously had both of these buttoned up but completely forgot the rest. Perhaps they thought it all just happened if you got a product and a customer?

If it turns out that any directors hold rights to part of the technology via other companies then we will have another Pheonix/Rover debacle.

support@moneyam.com

Before everybody gets too depressed, there might be an RNS later this morning or around 1pm today announcing the completed fundraising exercise.

Those large trade makes me think that there is something afoot.

The oily one

No that doesn't work Aldwickk

hewittalan6

Email them, if you don't believe me.

Just to confirm - the posting is from Geoff Ho at Shares.

Ian

Thank yo Ian,
Clarification.
aldwickk I rarely believe you, but there again I believe very little of what i read on these boards, even from me.

Thanks Ian

Who cares a stuff what shares magazine says or any one else punters should do their own research and not pick up on every small thing that is said.
Except Jack Straw that is.

Alan,

There is a vast difference between what is acceptable for you and I and others on this BB to post and what is acceptable for a 'journalist' or 'share tipper' in their professional capacity. IMO Mr Ho's posts fall far short of what I would consider professional. We dont purport to be experts, he does. You'd expect posts like his from some of the nutters we've seen over the past few years, but not from a professional - and certainly not from andysmith who got it right when hacks like Ho and Bulford were convincing us everything was hunky dory!

Oily,

Re telephone call - is it still on, nowt received!

hewittalan6,

So you didn't buy GFM, when i was tipping them.

Considerable number of buys and yet the price doesn't move - why?

Just some good news and those shorters would be stuffed - that would make my day!!

pinnacle
That was my point in post 20925 but every one seems preoccupied.

Oblomov

I shall send it again. Seems to have got lost in the ether.

However, having spoken at length to somebody yesterday afternoon, I have decided to wait a day or two before sending the proposed message; it seems we are very close to an announcement and my rather to the point questioning on their management skills would only be an unnecessary distraction for them right now.

Anyway, having slept on it, there are other questions which will be added if the fundraising does not go as well as intimated in their RNS yesterday.

Hope that's clear.

And to the person to whom I spoke yesterday, thanks very much for your measuread and rational input.

The oily one

I am but an innocent and naive child, so please somebody tell me why in my screen of 25 trades there are buys totalling 23m shares against a total of 30.5m shares traded (many of the rest of which are also buys) and the bloody price drops .04p!

Manipulation to fill somebody's order?

The oily one

Times Stock Market report page 75 today states:-

"Stanelco . . . fell . . . to 0.96p on confirming it is in the final stages of a fund-raising at 0.8p, against the 1p previously mooted. Stanelco is expected to accompany details of the rights issue - said to have secured at least 13 million - with a contract win."

Nothing absolute, but the Times does not ususally print unsubstantiated rumour. "Rights issue" - what, for all of us - that'll be the day.

Like the reference to "contract win".

sd