bosley
- 20 Feb 2004 09:34
andysmith
- 06 Oct 2006 10:48
- 20943 of 27111
Almost there, I did say wait for financing did I not as this would only happen now IF there was credible good news, without it they are gone.
Recent shares articles about shorting absolutely correct if trading is your game.
The company had reducing cash, no orders and is running out of backers.
I said sell from 18p, again at 12p then 8p and recently at 3p with a wait for re-financing note but apparently I was wrong??? Personally I have no agenda to short a company although I could be minted if I had done this on SEO.
Recent shares articles about potential recovery stock was also right so they have covered both strategies and that is what their magazine is for so tough shit if one side doesn't take your fancy, it is a magazine with articles and opinions and you make your own choices.
SEO, a money-maker for the lucky ones last year, a disaster for the blind this, I wonder what the future holds???
kimoldfield
- 06 Oct 2006 10:54
- 20944 of 27111
The future? SEO's fate has been sealed...............or GreenSealed.
kim
AdieH
- 06 Oct 2006 10:54
- 20945 of 27111
Are you tempted then Andy or is still too hot... If there is a substancial contract win I think its more by luck than by excellent management negotiations... I could be tempted but not sure we have found the bottom yet..
aldwickk
- 06 Oct 2006 10:54
- 20946 of 27111
Very good post Andy.
bhunt1910
- 06 Oct 2006 10:58
- 20947 of 27111
Excellent summary Andy - how I wish I had listened - hindsight is a wonderful thing - well done you for getting it right at the time
bhunt1910
- 06 Oct 2006 10:58
- 20948 of 27111
Excellent summary Andy - how I wish I had listened - hindsight is a wonderful thing - well done you for getting it right at the time
oblomov
- 06 Oct 2006 10:59
- 20949 of 27111
Nice post Andy, but I prefer stockdogs. First mention of a truly likely contract a source of The Times standing.
oblomov
- 06 Oct 2006 11:00
- 20950 of 27111
Nice post Andy, but I prefer stockdogs. First mention of a truly likely contract a source of The Times standing.
Oilywag
- 06 Oct 2006 11:02
- 20951 of 27111
bhunt1910 and oblomov
Do you two like the sound of your own voices?
Any connection with New York? (Oh, work it out for yourselves!)
lol
The oily one
aldwickk
- 06 Oct 2006 11:09
- 20953 of 27111
![<img src=]()
" alt="" />
AdieH
- 06 Oct 2006 11:31
- 20954 of 27111
Really depends on the contract if it is a contract, Doubt you would get institutions willing to invest 13 million if there wasn't a significant contract in the wings... Could be a great chance to make some money, time will tell and this is only for the brave (not sure i'm that brave)...
robinhood
- 06 Oct 2006 11:31
- 20955 of 27111
Strange that FT.com does not say anything about, supposedly, the contract win
greekman
- 06 Oct 2006 11:38
- 20956 of 27111
OB,
Re your last post (Geoff Hoe) and comment....... "IMO Mr Ho's posts fall far short of what I would consider professional".
I fully agree,and that one sentence sums his post up completely.
bosley
- 06 Oct 2006 12:26
- 20957 of 27111
oh come on guys!! geoff ho has an opinion on a stock . that is his job, to give his opinion and his reasons. his opinion on seo management is pretty much the same as everyone else's on here; that they are incompetent and that they have fucked up a promising company. maybe a few of you need to take a look at yourselves and stop being so bloody sensitive. this is about making money, not about being nice. as andysmith says, the time to sell was 30p, when it was obvious to all that seo was being hyped/ramped up. some people saw it and got out . others, myself included, fell for it , fell for the hype, the spin, the bullshit and held on believing and waiting for that big rns that never came. thankfully, i got out at 18p and 15p. many others didn't and, whilst i have a certain amount of sympathy for those nursing large losses, nobody can say that they didn't see this coming, that warnings weren't given.
pinnacle
- 06 Oct 2006 12:27
- 20958 of 27111
NEWS FLASH!!
Basil Fawlty has a gnome for us to give to Mr Ho!!!!!
jimward9
- 06 Oct 2006 12:34
- 20959 of 27111
Shares mag do not always get it right, just another to add to the list of mistakes!
Only time will tell.
maddoctor
- 06 Oct 2006 12:37
- 20960 of 27111
they wouldn,t be journalists if they got it right more times than not would they
is that so difficult to understand?
anything they say should be subject to DYOR and the consequences are yours
and thats not to say i agree with the words of Geoff Ho , i thought they were disgraceful
Paperbackwriter
- 06 Oct 2006 12:59
- 20962 of 27111
Robinhood,
That's what I was thinking. Why did they omit it this time?