Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.
  • Page:
  • 1
  • ...
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11

(BETA) Market Close Data Download (BETA)     

Karl(MoneyAM) - 19 Aug 2004 17:27

Dear all,

We are currently developing a new Data Download tool and are looking for testers. On release, this will be for 'Active' and above subscription levels.

If you are interested please click here.

Your comments and suggestions are welcome.

Karl.

qwento - 14 Oct 2005 23:04 - 213 of 218

Karl - I have run a check tonight on the EOD data.

I have a lengthy list of discrepancies which I can email to you if you so wish.

For instance :

AAL Low - you show this as 1569.76. If as you say you are taking the SETS traded high/low this can not be. AAL is traded from the book in pence - that is the lowest denominator.

ABF Low - you show 802. There were no 'AT' trades for this price - there was however a 'O' trade !

And, even worse ULVR is showing a high of 40035.2 which just goes to show what can happen when you base high/low figures on 'O' trades.

HOR which I imagine is a SEAQ stock. You show the open, high and low as 68p. You look at an intraday chart of HOR. See the difference ! The Open and High is in fact 70.5 and the Low and Close is 68.25. You have the close correct.

Karl(MoneyAM) - 17 Oct 2005 13:00 - 214 of 218

qwento,

Looks like it is back to the drawing board :(

All the figures we show are direct from our supplier. We will look into post processing the intraday data to get some more accurate information.

Thanks for the help,

K

hilary - 17 Oct 2005 13:09 - 215 of 218

Isn't the obvious answer to change supplier in that case rather than fannying around "post processing" data?

TullettJ (MoneyAM) - 17 Oct 2005 13:57 - 216 of 218

hilary,

There's only one other supplier that's worth considering and our experience with them while working at the other place showed us that they were not much better and their data still needs to be messed around with. As such, we may as well fix what we've got already.

J.

hilary - 11 Feb 2008 13:06 - 217 of 218

TTT.

Whatever happened to this?

IanT(MoneyAM) - 11 Feb 2008 13:07 - 218 of 218

Hilary,

We are no longer developing this service I am afraid.

Ian
  • Page:
  • 1
  • ...
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
Register now or login to post to this thread.