If you're having any problems, or want to suggest some improvements, please post below!

Level2 changes
In the last few weeks we've needed to implement some code changes to make us compliant with the LSE's rules on the access of Level2 data.

The following requirement is now in place:
You can only use 1 program on 1 computer to access Level2 on MoneyAM using a single username.

This means that you are able to view as many Level2 windows using any one particular browser, or program, that you wish, however you will not be able to use both Firefox and Internet Explorer at the same time (the same goes for using Quote Tracker or TradeSeeker at the same time as viewing it using a web browser)

If you find you're being logged off of MoneyAM's Level2 with the message 'you've logged on from another location' then check the above and make sure you're not running any other programs at the same time before reporting this as a bug.

Mike; Don't give up on us yet. Yes, we have list of requests which gets longer and longer each day. Sadly however our policy is that we will implement changes on a 'do we have spare minute' basis and recently we have had no time. However you will notice that we have started to make some small headway in that we had a large number of users wanting streaming charts so we have gone with the flow and done this (not yet finalised). Why was that a priority, well two fold:

1) It was a request made by a large number
2) Commercially it made sense to do it

That is not to say that every change we do is influenced solely by 1 & 2 but it does help us to balance wish aginst need against cost.

On your specific request we are taking a look but in fact we have been contemplating a better alerts service which would be linked to news, which might be a bigger and better solution. More on this at a later date

Mike

Thanks for the reply Mike. Anything that moves us forward is to be welcomed of course, though I do wonder whether we're going down the road of streaming news or pop-up boxes. So does it mean more windows?

What I was trying to give a little insight into is the fact that - necessarily - my trading screen real-estate versus work-screen real estate is small - I don't want to have too many streaming connections open otherwise my corporate IT people are going to complain. They locked me out of CMC for a couple of weeks earlier this year probably due to bandwidth monitoring. Welcome to the real world (sigh).

Also, if I was showing one of my colleagues or my boss something on my screen, and then I got a sudden pop-up window telling me "BARCLAYS BELOW 480!" or "AFX: Psion Shoot themselves in other foot" then this would be bad :-)

I believe my boss and I share a "don't ask don't tell" policy on trading but when it starts to attract attention everyone is ultimately going to lose, MoneyAM possibly included.

I doubt I'm the only member of the 'corporate trading underground' out here but I wonder if sometimes companies like MoneyAM forget the real world this part of its customer base live in and that what we need is a low-profile low-bandwidth solution which has the basics we require packed into a centimeter of space at the bottom of our screens - perhaps "bigger and better solutions" could at least be considered in this context...

[On edit: oops, didn't realise that I'd "hit the tit". Sorry, everybody.]

Hello Dell,

Yes, I miss NV. I didn't trade with them - I just subscribed for the streaming prices - and I really only used it to monitor news. I'd love to know what Fastrade were thinking when they took NV over and threw out all the technology which NV had built, in favour of their 'service'. Still, I suppose it was all about buying the customer base.

I remember how quickly a lot of us went from ESI/Etrade to ADVFN and then here. If a better streaming service were launched by someone else tomorrow then realistically I'd be off, because as I said in a previous post - this is 90% of my daily requirement. I wonder how many other customers would be in the same position? Honestly, perhaps its very few - but I usually take the view that if that's what I'd do, I'm probably not the only one. I'd rather give MoneyAM my business because I think I quite like the people - but that said I can only make allowances for so much if I think a poorer service is costing me money...

OK the DOW loss/ gains works, but in INDU quotes how do I get rid of the fact that the ` latest` news from the DOW is dated Feb.and the chart on the right is yesterdays?

Would it be possible to put the time +or- the date in a field on the Idex Screen Sometimes it is useful

Would, could or will it be possible to order the individual portfolios by Name or Epic as well as date columns. I find the lay out is a little confusing. (I am told I am easily confused.)

Best wishes

Sequestor,

I will get the guys to take a look into this.

Fred,

Thanks for the feedback - I will add it to the earlier comments from Kyoto.

Ian

Ian it also mentions it was updated by some Ashley James bloke, maybe thats the prob.

lol

Sequestor,

I have just taken a look and the chart on the right is a one year INDU chart. The chart on the left is the intraday.

With regard to the News, the news will be added to that page if an article is asigned with the appropriate epic code. As we do not receive any news for INDU from our feeds, the only news which would appear their would be anything that Kam (our journalist) adds to the site and marks it with INDU. It would seem that he has done this on one occassion hence the one story.

Ian

Ah I see,Ian, my mistake, perhaps your guy might like to add a few more tit bits from the DOW to the site , Feb.is a long time back

cheers

Sequestor,

I will see what I can do.

Ian

thanks,even removing the present news would improve my mind, seeing the latest
apparent news being "Wall ST. seen opening lower" is depressing

If I put the Epic code into the bb search e.g. MKS nothing comes up , I know there is a thread because I just opened one, not noticing there was one here, BAY etc. nothing comes up?

Sequestor,

Many apologies for this - we are aware of the problem and are working to reolve it - Jonathan is aware of this.

Please accept my apologies for the inconvenience.

Ian

Sequestor
It is case sensative did you put in mks bay or MKS BAY?

blush, rapidly reddening, er mks and bay, works now with caps.

cheers

ps there are some olives on this olive- branch for you

lol

:) I keep moaning that it should not be case sensitive but they ignore me as usual

ah well, as I always say , ` them as tries beats them as doesn`t", wonder why they call me a boring old fart?

Martini,


Do not despair, I am listening - JT will be looking into this as part of a general review of the BB's.

Ian

It's also that the EPIC field on threads should always be forced to upper-case on input. No sense in allowing both MKS and mks as EPIC. I made this comment at the very beginning but they ignored me :-)