Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

stanelco .......a new thread (SEO)     

bosley - 20 Feb 2004 09:34

Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&SiChart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&Si

for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm


Confidant - 13 Oct 2006 12:25 - 21407 of 27111

over 500 posts since I last logged

but as I said then don't underestimate the impact of refi's

Whether the co has a product is totally immaterial short term just ride the technical wave set your out target price and make sure you bank some return. Sure you could miss the big wave up and in 5 years say wow I sold that share at 1.2p and now its 100p but there will be plenty of chaances to buy back in when the news is a bit more solid -- i.e. trade this baby and care not about the co's products

Thx to the guy from Shares for the buy signal back at the 0.9 level

TheMaster - 13 Oct 2006 12:55 - 21408 of 27111

MM's signal code just gone through, a sell at 1.18p for one share, buy as many as you can now!

Haystack - 13 Oct 2006 12:56 - 21409 of 27111

LOL

More conspiracy theories.

It was not an MM trade anyway. It was an AT trade. It came off the order book. Trades get matched and reduce a trade on the order book by the size of the executed trade. It often leaves odd numbers of shares to be executed as part of another trade.

driver - 13 Oct 2006 13:03 - 21410 of 27111

Haystack
It might be a conspiracy theory but it did the trick 1.28 to buy.

hewittalan6 - 13 Oct 2006 14:25 - 21411 of 27111

I kind of half expected the SP to drop a fair bit this afternoon as traders took profits on the 30% rise since Monday, but it has not, so I assume much of the buying is shorters closing.
Alan

PATISEAR - 13 Oct 2006 14:42 - 21412 of 27111



Halifax say they are sending Email's to their costomers today.{re; 3 for 5}

Could someone please explain who these refer to.

1) Ordinary Shares marked 'ex entitlement' 10 October

2) Open Offer Entitlements credited to CREST stock accounts of 13 October
Qualifying CREST Shareholders


oblomov - 13 Oct 2006 15:09 - 21413 of 27111


Presumably 1) refers to shares bought after the cut off date of 9th. Oct and not
covered by the open offer.

2) Those shareholders with shares bought up to the cut-off date who hold through crest accounts.

alfalfa - 13 Oct 2006 15:30 - 21414 of 27111

oblo - Thanks for the patent date info. For the main Greenseal one then, the Priority Date is round about 10 April 2004, i.e. ~ 18 months earlier with 20 years to run from that date, assuming it runs to grant.


For info, today's post brought my letter from Hargreaves Lansdown inviting an application of 3 new for 5 old held at close of business on 9th October 2006.

The Election Form to take up the offer kindly works out your new share entitlement (still worth checking it yourself, of course) and does not allow you to apply for any amount greater than this entitlement, although you can apply for fewer.

Alfa.

jaguar121 - 13 Oct 2006 16:04 - 21415 of 27111

Anyone out there got any news on the factory in wales ?? Is it built yet ???

minordetail - 13 Oct 2006 16:05 - 21416 of 27111

being a relatively new boy to this world of shares doing my best to understand all that is going on with SEO. Am I right to understand that in order to generate funds they have arranged for lots of shares to be made available to existing share owners at a price of 0.80p. If you therefore owned shares on the given date you will be contacted and given the opportunity to buy more at this price. Are these shares the same as shares already owned - could you sell for instance the next day at the shown share price ? Sorry to be a pain but if anyone could take the time to confirm my understanding or clarify would much appreciate. Could be I am out of my depth certainly felt that way watching my investment decline the way it has over the last few weeks/months.

hewittalan6 - 13 Oct 2006 16:06 - 21417 of 27111

minordetail.
the answer to all your questions is yes.
you read it right.
Alan

minordetail - 13 Oct 2006 16:15 - 21418 of 27111

thank you Hew sorry for seeming like a simpleton but need to confirm my understanding. When these shares are in the market because of the dilution isn't the price likely to drop in respect of this additional volume. In which case is the risk in buying the additional shares subject to this price correction. Does that make sense?

hewittalan6 - 13 Oct 2006 16:21 - 21419 of 27111

Not a simpleton at all. None of us are born knowing how the markets work , and to be fair, most of us will die without ever really working it out!!
The theory is that 15mill (or whatever) is added to the number of shares in circulation and 15 million is added to the companys balance sheet. Result is no change.
In truth, the markets will take a view on whether this money will be used to move to profitability (in which case the price will rise) or be pi$$ed against a wall (in which case it will fall). Just as with the current shares.
Hope that helps,
Alan

minordetail - 13 Oct 2006 16:27 - 21420 of 27111

Alan thanks very much

driver - 13 Oct 2006 16:31 - 21421 of 27111

Al
I like your new name Hew

oblomov - 13 Oct 2006 16:36 - 21422 of 27111


Or should that read Phew!

kimoldfield - 13 Oct 2006 16:37 - 21423 of 27111

Jaguar121
The factory project in Wales has been shelved. When I last spoke to SEO they said it was still on their list but no longer a priority. (It seems their priority turned out to be to lose as much money as they could in the shortest possible time!!)
kim

rpaco - 13 Oct 2006 17:43 - 21424 of 27111

Yeah that wall is in for a good wetting, first with champagne as the input into the director's pension scheme and future reward system is celebrated, then with the other stuff as the directors fail to direct and the managers fail to manage again.
Now if they said they were to manufacture Starpol from bullshit, that would be something, since they have created their own mountain thereof. I feel sorry for the engineers and chemists down in the engine room, the good ship SEO having almost run aground, now has to negotiate all those icebergs. Yes thats right, the ones that were supposed to be almost melted months ago, but are still there mostly below the surface. Any one of which could rent a fatal tear in the hull long before the ship sails into paradise harbour.

hewittalan6 - 13 Oct 2006 21:43 - 21425 of 27111

Call me whatever you like as long as you call me when its teatime!!
I see we've moved from The French Connection to Titanic. Gene Hackman to leonardo Di Caprio in 2 days!! The SP's good looks have done exactly the same, and the directors are still cast as Forrest Gump, even as they script The Colour of Money meets Snatch, with a few scenes from gone in 60 seconds.
If they ever do make a film of all this, lets hope its a Disney one. At least we will get a happy ending.
Alan

bosley - 13 Oct 2006 21:46 - 21426 of 27111

but bambi got shot.
Register now or login to post to this thread.