Moneylender
- 23 Jan 2003 08:09
superrod
- 08 Jan 2006 22:15
- 2149 of 2262
olie
did you know that a googol to the power of a googol
( 10 to the power of a hundred to the power of 10 to a hundred ) cant be written as an ordinary number?
it contains more zeroes than there are atoms in the known universe.
wish i could post the actual figure, its most impressive as it only uses 12 integers
blinger
- 09 Jan 2006 10:12
- 2150 of 2262
I didn`t know that super, but I do now, and it has made Monday morning a real pleasure,
you be good now!!!
ps 1 divided by zero is better.
ravey davy gravy
- 09 Jan 2006 13:09
- 2151 of 2262
New all time low for Tadpole, is that statement a hint that they have
severe cashflow problems ?
pachandl
- 09 Jan 2006 13:21
- 2152 of 2262
What a strangely worded statement - why make it at all when it simply leaves an air of uncertainty over the whole compnay.
Kivver
- 09 Jan 2006 14:26
- 2153 of 2262
is the end near, is my small investment going to disappear. Is it time for tadpole to frog off??
pachandl
- 09 Jan 2006 16:21
- 2154 of 2262
Either the end-game or pure brinkmanship by Steig. Not certain which but I am certainly not building up my expectations.
blinger
- 09 Jan 2006 17:25
- 2155 of 2262
I foretold this months back, when one of the cardies said that the money was due. As I then said, if you owe some co. money .and also know they have a cash-flow prob. you don`t pay them, simple as that, they can`t afford to go to court.Excuses about the contract details, complaints about the product are all valid excuses to hold back cash.The next step, again as I told you, is to negotiate a part payment to TAD, erm , yes less than the full sum, eventually they will have to take it, GEM aint going to work anymore.
Not long before the end now, unless of course yuffs` vast knowledge of business can help them out?
What a bunch, they never have listened from 84p.
blinger
- 09 Jan 2006 17:47
- 2156 of 2262
Someone ask the Yuffer when the EGM is, he seems to be really up there with the Captains of Industry.
pachandl
- 09 Jan 2006 20:49
- 2157 of 2262
Of course it might simply be a dangerous gambit to get Softbank to pay seeing as they are involved in some sort of merger/take-over at present? Forlorn hope I know, but that is what being a Tad holder entails.
blinger
- 09 Jan 2006 22:10
- 2158 of 2262
No what being a TAD holder entails is being shafted- constantly - let go and cash in the money-25 is 25,
let go for goodness sake.
pachandl
- 10 Jan 2006 11:20
- 2159 of 2262
25 for such brilliant year long entertainment - worth every penny.
blinger
- 10 Jan 2006 18:33
- 2160 of 2262
lol pach,
well the guru says eveything is all right on 3 eyes, we know his reputation well, one of the old 84p crowd, so sleep well holders, guru is bullish!!!!
blinger
- 12 Jan 2006 19:43
- 2161 of 2262
When TAD was funny
----------
Moneylender - 13 May 2003 16:01 - 6 of 19
Is this the main TAD thread now?
M
xfg68 - 13 May 2003 16:04 - 7 of 19
No, the other one is the "main" one. This one is for TAD discussion only
superrod
- 12 Jan 2006 22:13
- 2162 of 2262
whatever your point of view, its very sad to see a once "stock market darling" on its knees waiting for the coup de gras.
they say never fall in love with a share, but tad has supplied me ( as a former bull ) and all the bears with 10 years of excitement.
i have calculated tonight that during that period i have spent 270073 on shares and sold 268336. a loss but where else could you get such a thrill over such a long time for such an outlay?
atb to the remaining followers.
pachandl
- 13 Jan 2006 10:19
- 2163 of 2262
Super - we seem to have had a similar level of "success" with Tad (provided you divide your figures by 10 when it comes to my performance). Although I am still in profit I am a current holder so the chances are that I will end up like you - slightly in the red. All the best with your future investments.
romanof
- 13 Jan 2006 10:54
- 2164 of 2262
Waking NED-----a winner
blinger
- 13 Jan 2006 13:04
- 2165 of 2262
I see this poll was rapidly pulled by the chief cardie when a majority of those polled seemed likely to say `leave things alone`, 33% did anyway, what a gang.
blinger
- 13 Jan 2006 16:21
- 2166 of 2262
I don`t ever recall TAD being a " stockbroker darling" superrer; any stockbroker I ever spoke to ( and I am going back to its commencement) laughed at the name, it was always the subject of penny -share dreadfuls` tips`,ramping on bb`s, and
a total lack of profit for 20 years.In fact I reckon that but for the tip-sheets and rampers it would have collapsed years back.
After saying that, I have traded TAD on and off to the tune of 200k turnover over the years, plus more during its` better days when one could spread bet it.I made a decent return , mainly on shorts, but significant amounts long.Its always been merely a short term trading share, ironically all the time that " he who has departed" and gang were bringing the wrath of some satanic devil-worship down on anyone who was negative, I quietly amasses a few bob both long & shorting it- the gang always said one couldn`t short it, one could.
Its useless for anything now long or short, and will be put down soon, the cardies will never get an EGM, and certainly won`t sack anyone.
I bid you a good weekend.
ps the trick is that the 200k turnover was traded with about 5k cash, closing on T+ in the main.Not bad to have made anything from such small outlay.
superrod
- 14 Jan 2006 22:42
- 2167 of 2262
olie
put your specs on.
i said STOCK MARKET DARLING.
( all shares are stockbroker darlings, because they EARN from them)
blinger
- 15 Jan 2006 18:52
- 2168 of 2262
er yes super I know that,but we obviouslyb dealt with a totally different sort of stockbroker, any time I mentioned TAD to the four I used "yuuckk" was the word, darling didn`t come into it---however as a trading share via "without advice" brokers it had some pull.