goldfinger
- 09 Jun 2005 12:25
Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).
Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.
cheers GF.
goldfinger
- 20 Feb 2013 09:07
- 21555 of 81564
Well thats the Libs isnt it not labour. Its a bloody daft idea that bit.
Inheritance tax for me should be bringing in far more than the £2.8 billion it brought in in 2012
I belive in responsible capitalism, my new house bought 6 months back is a multiple of the threshold they are going for. Im glad to pay it. Austerity.....what austerity, hasnt hit me one jot.
When torries start talking about how hard its hit the higher class (lol) instead of displaying tax paid they should instead be talking about how its hit the rich's disposable income................... not one jot.
And as for the hand out ie from 50% to 45% mine will all go in the bank and i dare say it will for 99.9% of all other higher tax payers. Thats no way to stimulate the economy.
In fact their is an economic case for raising benefits as the propensity to spend is 100% with them, now that would put some cash back in for the multiplyer to work on.
Fred1new
- 20 Feb 2013 09:07
- 21556 of 81564
Cynic.
I associate "despise" more with your stance in relationship to other people.
Yes, my political views in general more akin to those of Labour than tory, I see much of the latter’s populist policies are based personal greed and avarice.
I do agree in the general direction of Labour and I think the left of the Liberal party (Vince), as far as economic direction and “social” direction for society. But to expect labour to lay out details of policies 2years, before the next election is stupidity and an attempt by Cameron and the rest of the carpetbaggers associated with him to set an infantile trap, hoping to that the labour leadership will step into it.
It is seen that figures Osborne, who is supposed to be in charge of the books, presents at a budget, or when responding to questions can’t be trusted as can be seen by “
Ofcom raises £2.34bn in 4G auction, less than forecast”,
There are many individuals in the labour party, who I don't rate and opinions I disagree with, but they are not in the lime light at the moment.
As far as Hays is concern he seems to be becoming more and more of a party zealot , who swallows all the dictates from above or directed by the party apparatus to spout more and more rubbish.
goldfinger
- 20 Feb 2013 09:10
- 21557 of 81564
And as for Margeret Hodge with her hidden dosh in TRUST FUNDS (tax dodge to get round paying inheritance tax) well how dare she!!
goldfinger
- 20 Feb 2013 09:14
- 21558 of 81564
Allister Heath @AllisterHeath
4G auction raises £1.1bn less than Osborne hoped for. So deficit now even more likely to go up, not down, this year.
Triple A rating on the line.
3 monkies
- 20 Feb 2013 09:36
- 21559 of 81564
I have received 2 e-mails recently from Halifax on line banking which have been in my junk box - Starts off "Dear Valued Customer, bla bla bla they want one to update online banking details and phone no. etc., then it says click here". I have ignored both but rang the Halifax this morning and I am not the first. It is a scam which I thought it was as they would address the person by their name if they wanted to contact the customer by e-mail!!!! Hope this is of some interest to some of you out there.
Fred1new
- 20 Feb 2013 09:41
- 21560 of 81564
I wish I had as many bank accounts as the scam merchants think I have.
They are a b. nuisance.
3 monkies
- 20 Feb 2013 09:45
- 21561 of 81564
Me too, but it was of concern when it happens to be a bank one does use.
cynic
- 20 Feb 2013 09:52
- 21562 of 81564
never ever ever ever respond to that type of e-mail .... they are GUARANTEED to be scams
cynic
- 20 Feb 2013 09:53
- 21563 of 81564
GF - trust funds have been in existence for decades if not since income tax was introduced! ..... in fact, they rarely produce the result hoped for, not only because trust law is forever changing, but also unforeseeable events and circumstances
goldfinger
- 20 Feb 2013 09:56
- 21564 of 81564
Still tax avoidance, and should be tax evasion.
Fred1new
- 20 Feb 2013 09:57
- 21565 of 81564
The current 'apprentice National Minimum Wage' is currently £2.65 per hour*.
Is the number of those "working as apprentices in the various schemes" considered to be employed and is that number deducted from unemployment figures generally quoted?
goldfinger
- 20 Feb 2013 09:58
- 21566 of 81564
Alex Belardinelli @abelardinelli
On 4G auction shortfall IDS tells @BBCNews, "until the receipts come in, you don't count that money" - exact opposite of what Osborne did
LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL
this tory government is falling apart.
IDS gone to pieces since Grayling left him.
skinny
- 20 Feb 2013 10:55
- 21568 of 81564
GF - you can go too far! :-)
I seem to have been filled on a limit FTSE short @6,397 - I thought I'd cancelled it last night - the day is not going well so far!
Fred1new
- 20 Feb 2013 10:59
- 21569 of 81564
Swap positions.
Yesterday I had a smile on my face.
Somebody has nicked it.
Fred1new
- 20 Feb 2013 11:01
- 21570 of 81564
I had a motto, when you think it is going well, prepare for shots.
I must obey myself more often!
Fred1new
- 20 Feb 2013 11:13
- 21571 of 81564
Ps. In the present market one can learn a little more each day.
The problem is remembering what you have learnt and then using that information appropriately.
Give a little whistle.
cynic
- 20 Feb 2013 11:26
- 21572 of 81564
GF - don't be such an ass ...... if the law allows avoidance by the use of taking a certain course of action, then it is neither illegal nor even reprehensible .....
even writing a simple will is potentially or actually avoiding tax, and certainly taking out life policies and similar is ...... are you saying that that action is reprehensible?
i certainly have every intention of leaving my (grand)children as well-provided for as i can manage without taking "agressive action", always ensuring that i do not cripple my own standard of living in so doing ..... i'm only sorry that i cannot afford to give them the chance to be put through private education which, like it or not (and i don't care either way), tends to be to a higher standard that state ..... though the state schools in my grandchildrens area happen to be very good
Haystack
- 20 Feb 2013 11:46
- 21573 of 81564
3m
My wife got the same letter from Halifax and the 'salutation' says Dear Mrs ... I used to own a software company and a part of our business was direct mail. We used to send out 2m plus letters every month. The software generates the salutation from the details held on your account. If it cannot be sure it is correct then it uses a default salutation such as Dear Traveller, Dear valued customer. Have a look at the window address and see if there is anything odd.
I know of another company that was mailing high net worth customers of Nat West. They could not decide on a default salutation and forgot about it. The mailing went out with the salutation put in by the programmer for testing. It was "Dear filthy rich bastard".
Haystack
- 20 Feb 2013 11:54
- 21574 of 81564
I am afraid that there is no prospect of a cure for dyed in the wool lefties like GF. Where I live at the moment, most of the properties are more than or close to £2m value. These houses and flats are inhabited by mainly old people on fixed incomes. Many of them are cash poor and live on the state pension. The house was left to them in many cases or they bought it many years ago. They have no ability to pay a mansion tax. Are they supposed to sell their houses to pay the tax. Are they to be penalised because their house has turned out to be in a trendy area and has consequently rocketed in price. The houses were fairly cheap when they bought them.