bosley
- 20 Feb 2004 09:34
ssanebs
- 18 Mar 2005 16:14
- 2187 of 27111
SEO awarded 95% costs victory and decision held and leave to appeal. Things just get better for seo...
Chelsea1957
- 18 Mar 2005 16:20
- 2188 of 27111
Thanks for that Driver - I'm glad I got in first at the 10p level and topped up a few times so that I'm now averaging just below 15p. Which 6-12 months down the road will be down on the "flat piece" looking down from on high!
Not as clever as you folks who have been here for ages, but still a lot cheaper than those who will be geting in when "the real story" becomes generally known!!!
panic
- 18 Mar 2005 16:34
- 2189 of 27111
Ruthie: Lets hope in a year you can try it with Bolly!
has rns appeared yet?, im looking but not finding, thought one of them would have released by now if it finished at 12:30
mickeyskint
- 18 Mar 2005 16:59
- 2190 of 27111
Can anyone give me an idea where these will be in 6/12 months. A realistic guess would help and may influence me holding long term.
Have a good weekend.
MS
TheFrenchConnection
- 18 Mar 2005 16:59
- 2191 of 27111
Amities/ Il fait beau-le soleil brille !!! All sorts of conflicting rumours flying around the city this morning ;but consensus of opinion by lunchtime would indeed appear SEO have left court with a result beyond the most optimistic of scenarios & expectations; and in doing so leaving BPRG licking thier wounds. Congragulations to Dynamite who posted no more than a few minutes after the decision had been made in court ! ..Where you there ? Or merely communicating via Proxy ? Or by satellite.? But regardless; Felicitations !! Commenting on the outcome of the case, no one could accuse CEO Balchin of not thinking his cause was right what with threatening to lock BPRG in years of a labyrinth of litigation if they ventured to appeal . . ln total antiphisis to Balchins upbeat bullishness was the spokesperson for BPRG who i rang as to ascertain thier interpretation of the courts ruling and thier position as to exercise thier judicial right to an appeal and as i expected they merely relied "No Comment " and it was both "premature " and imprudent" to comment as of yet ; and pure waffle of reviewing thier legal position after consultation with instructing solicitor/Counsel ..Mere plattitudes .........Time for the fun to begin perhaps !!. Perhaps time now for those who sat on thier hands citing the c/c as grounds for non involvement to open thier cheque books .... A great day !!! ,,Even my old boss at Pershings who not more than a month ago stated he WAS VERY interested in SEO but not until the c/c was complete and at no more than 10p was very non commital as if caught with his trosers down and began jabbered a load of unintelligible nonsense about his acting on clients behalf as opposed to his own which in itself meant absolutely nothing; but which in knowing the man spoke volumes and i interpreted as his concealing the fact that he had in fact taken a position . Also upon getting home from work and now looking at SEo s trades on Money AM there exists a significant number of errors in that a number of "sells" which were in fact "buys" ,,,But still in the back of my mind is this darn perfunctual forecoming rights issue. l juste fear institutions will be offered a lions share at a much discounted price to ensure neccassary funds will be raised So we can but hope the s/p puts a little more weight on before such an issue is announced so as to make it impossible for institutions to pick up stock at to much of a discount .si suelement ,,,,,But lets take it a day at a time and enjoy to-day for what is was - a very positive and significant one .....,,,,For every great journey starts with the first step ...and we have taken it ,,,C'EST TOUT .LOL MERCI ,,.Ou est la pub LA PLUS? qu-est-ceque vous avez a boire ? ...bonne chance ,,,,,faires attention , sois sages ,,,,a/b @+ J
stockdog
- 18 Mar 2005 17:38
- 2192 of 27111
Looking forward to bosley's return from work and his reacton to today's events. lol :)
stockdog
- 18 Mar 2005 18:01
- 2195 of 27111
Di
I suggest we all maintain total radio silence on KMR. We all know our company and that it will be worth considerably more towards start of mining (hardly mining - just scooping up the sand) and we can all DOOR. The thread is fun when it's fun, but we don' really need it till it's clean again.
I might try a sqwelch - I've no idea what it does either! You can always unsquelch.
SD
stockdog
- 18 Mar 2005 18:55
- 2197 of 27111
You'll recognise me. I'll be the one on all fours with a collar round my neck!
I imagine you will be wearing a trailing blue touch-paper - stand well back, please!!
SD
bosley
- 18 Mar 2005 21:19
- 2198 of 27111
sd, driver, andys, eric,di, just sitting here smiling , grinning ear to ear , nodding sagely. there arn't many better feelings than absolute and total smugness. to all those who wanted balchin out , i give you the finger. he has played a blinder. i did have doubts myself but then thought to myself that he and the board had led us this far. i honestly thought today would be the last buying opportunity as i expected negative news. there is still no rns so we shouldnt believe too much in rumour , BUT, looking at the volume and the price hike it certainly feels like there is some truth in the rumours. most importantly , we have break out. and you know what happened last time we broke out of the trading band..... oh!!! i feel so smug. dont you all feel smug????
(heavily edited and re written so as not to offend ladies and sensitive souls)
bosley
- 18 Mar 2005 22:19
- 2200 of 27111
i am sure he will be , driver.
Jumpin
- 18 Mar 2005 22:53
- 2201 of 27111
Could anyone give me a forward P/E please?
Poverty
- 19 Mar 2005 01:27
- 2202 of 27111
I have to admit that I have been in and out of SEO more times than a cat stuck in a revolving door! "longer term" to me is something like a week! However I do like these shares and have been in and out since 8p meself - not always trading at quite the right! - but it has been my most fun share this year! Hurrah! Court cases can go so wrong and have very little to do with justice at all it seems - so if it is SEO's day then I will not be shedding any little tears...
Jumpin
- 19 Mar 2005 10:09
- 2203 of 27111
No-one wish to answer my question?
Give you a clue...
Turnover 1.33M
Pre-tax profit -2.85M
Mkt cap 132M
Yes that is a mkt cap of 132M on a loss of nearly 3M and a turnover of just over a million quid!
stockdog
- 19 Mar 2005 10:56
- 2204 of 27111
jumpin
That's the historic figures you've got there to 31/10/04 when they made a loss.
Forecast to 31/10/05 is sales of 5.03m, proft of 0.45m and PE of 130 - scary but positive. This reduces to PE of 47 for the following year with a PEG of 0.26 - i.e. it's anticipated growth in EPS is keeping up with the highly rated PE very well.
What's your problem?
SD
Jumpin
- 19 Mar 2005 11:00
- 2205 of 27111
P/E of 130 and then oh fantastic a P/E of 47?
You think that is that good?
And I suppose everything will be glorious and go to plan with no setbacks in the meantime either
stockdog
- 19 Mar 2005 11:13
- 2206 of 27111
It's the extraordinarily positive optimistic market indicator of how good they all think this company is and will become - the market is all about future anticipated results. And it does not matter to you what I think.
It does matter to you what YOU think. What I think you think tells me you should not buy into this share or you should immediately sell what you own now so you can stop worrying about it.
hope this helps
SD