Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

stanelco .......a new thread (SEO)     

bosley - 20 Feb 2004 09:34

Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&SiChart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&Si

for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm


driver - 31 Oct 2006 16:28 - 21978 of 27111

ALCHEMY

Its called supply and demand if you put your house up for sale at say 1 and ten punters offer you 90p you tell them where to go, then some one come along (Not Alan his council) and offers you 1.20 your not going to say no, so the price has in effect gone up. On reflection there was ten sellers and one buyer and the price went up if you believe that you will believe anything.

ALCHEMY - 31 Oct 2006 16:36 - 21979 of 27111

Thx Greekman.
Does anyone have any thoughts on where SEO's shareprice will be after Monday if the refinance goes through without any problems? would it follow that if all is well the shareprice rockets with investers clamering to buy or would it be more of a sedate return to previous levels?

hewittalan6 - 31 Oct 2006 16:44 - 21980 of 27111

Alchemy.
No one can answer that honestly. It could do just about anything, though I think, from my research, a steady rise is on the cards, rather than a late bonfire night.
We do not know, though many of us suspect we do, what may accompany, or follow, the EGM.
Alan

robinhood - 31 Oct 2006 16:46 - 21981 of 27111

think stanelco will announce the sigining of the 2 contracts during egm -which i reckon are subject to egm financing approval. if not they better have riot police at the venue...Also dying to find out starpol 3000 development with fda

garyble - 31 Oct 2006 16:48 - 21982 of 27111

Greekman,

Th 85,000,000 is shown on MAM and ADVFN at 1.0p (850k). The RNS states the nominal value of 0.1p (85k).....

greekman - 31 Oct 2006 16:49 - 21983 of 27111

I think the price will actually go up a tad (OK opinion only, already digging my bunker). The dilution, has in my opinion already been mainly priced in, but so to some extent has the financing. As soon as the offer was recorded all knew what the dilution would be if fully taken up, but it was not so certain if it would all go through smoothly. Those who expect that the diluted average re total holdings value will even out pro rata to the pre dilution price per share ,should think 'Have you already priced the value in for your own holdings, if so others will have also'.

The EGM will be the make or break of this share, and not to put a too strong slant on it the company. The substance will say it all.

bhunt1910 - 31 Oct 2006 16:50 - 21984 of 27111

Why would anyone buy seo via a WT at 1.2p when for most of the day u could buy them cheaper than that. 2.5m WT and a 1m O trade at the end ??

Tonyrelaxes - 31 Oct 2006 16:53 - 21985 of 27111

Greekman

Earlier today I admitted I misread todays RNS thinking the Nominal price of 1p was the selling price, but now looking back I see sellsell 's post 21875 on friday afternoon said "85m trades gone through at 1p ".
Stockdog above in 21913 used calculations saying "85,000,000 sold at approx 1.226".

Not having been around on friday, nor access to details of individual trades I am no clearer as to whether AoR need other cash toenable them to take up their full entitlements or have enough to pay as required by this Thursday morning's deadline



alfalfa - 31 Oct 2006 16:55 - 21986 of 27111

greekman - garyble is correct. The sale of 85M on 27th October was made at 1.0p per share as shown below:

#------Trade Code----Price (p)--------Size----------Type----Bid-----Offer----Trade Time
85---004ZLA2H06-----1.0--------85000000--------O-----1.11----1.15-----15:17:59

Thus, AoR have raised 850,000 with that sale.

Alfa.

greekman - 31 Oct 2006 16:59 - 21987 of 27111

Tony,

Yes I see what you mean, could be right. Now confused slightly.

Gary, Alfalfa,

Yes sorry just noticed that although I have never known a nominal share price on any float at .1p, me thinks as usual SEO have got it wrong and it should have said 1p. Anyone know different I will stand corrected.

Tonyrelaxes - 31 Oct 2006 16:59 - 21988 of 27111

Assuming the EGM passes uneventfully (ie. excluding contract announcements) I expect the refinance package will go through. That should result in a slight SP rise as an(other) uncertainty is removed.

Tuesday - probably a slight dip as the new shares become available for trading.

But if I know so much what the F*** am I doing here...

ALCHEMY - 31 Oct 2006 17:11 - 21989 of 27111

Cheers Alan. Am looking to buy up more SEO shares(sensible or not??) at around current price but want to hold fire t'ill after the EGM, how soon will the likes of myself ~(who can't get down to London for EGM) know if the company is on a secure financial footing? i suppose there will be news posted by the regulatory body immediatly after the meeting.
Dave

hewittalan6 - 31 Oct 2006 17:18 - 21990 of 27111

Talk Tony into taking his laptop!!
Alan

bhunt1910 - 31 Oct 2006 17:21 - 21991 of 27111

Alchemy - leave me your phone number and will phone you

maestro - 31 Oct 2006 17:25 - 21992 of 27111

ALCHEMY AKA CLEM CHAMBERS..infiltrators about

Haystack - 31 Oct 2006 17:27 - 21993 of 27111

The nominal vale has nothing to with the actual price or traded price. They are just known as shares of a nominal value of 0.1p. Hence the use of the word 'nominal' - name. If you set up a company of your own for instance you may issue 100 shares of 1p each or 1. It makes little difference for a small company. The nominal value is usually the denominations that were issued when the company was set up. It has no bearing on traded values.

There is a rule I believe that new shares issues cannot be sold at a price less than the nominal value (not a problem in this case as 1p is more than 0.1p). The share issue will mention the nominal value of the shares as that is part of their name. They are issued at whatever price is agreed though as a market price.

ALCHEMY - 31 Oct 2006 17:31 - 21994 of 27111

Thanks barry, will mail you no.
Whose Clem Chambers?

Tonyrelaxes - 31 Oct 2006 17:31 - 21995 of 27111

Alchemy
Based on the last fundraising EGM (OH, how much younger and hopeful we all were then!) they issued an RNS during the meeting (an hour earlier than this one) repeating a Statement that was presented to us in written form on arrival.
A further RNS was issued in the afternoon confirming the passing of motions.

If you want a phone call or SMS the moment the meeting ends let me know on tonyrelaxes@hotmail.com

Tonyrelaxes - 31 Oct 2006 17:34 - 21996 of 27111

Alchemy - ignore him. The village idiot. Harmless none the less.

ALCHEMY - 31 Oct 2006 17:55 - 21997 of 27111

Thanks Tony, probably best an sms, as am at work-in meetings etc. (work is terrible for getting in way of fun on the stock market!) what time does EGM commence?
Register now or login to post to this thread.