Crocodile
- 12 Sep 2003 23:06
We have lots of experienced traders on MoneyAM who would be glad to help if you have any trading questions.
goldfinger
- 03 Nov 2003 10:21
- 220 of 460
Have to say guys that I think interest rates increase of a quarter percent is already priced into the market, the problem would be if we were on the end of a half point rise, but I dont see that coming.
If you are holding in a finance company though I would start to be looking to off load. If Gordon Brown hikes up taxes as is generally thought and we get the rates increase these type of companys will come under pressure.
Three Gurus have warned on this in the last few weeks, David Schwartz the stock market historian, Evil Knievil and Edmund Jackson.
On the market as a whole I am rather bullish and am hoping for an xmas spike.
Good luck to everyone.
GF.
Melnibone
- 03 Nov 2003 10:29
- 221 of 460
In fact for example I'd be very surprised if many peoples mortgages will go up much, as they certainly didn't follow very closely the rates on the way down!
Banks look after themselves.
When rates go down they drop them straight away for savers but drag
their feet for borrowers thus maximising their differential.
When rates go up they will raise the borrowers and drag their
feet for the savers.
Don't forget that 0.25/0.5% has a greater percentage effect at 3% than it will
at say 9.0%.
Melnibone
goldfinger
- 03 Nov 2003 10:38
- 222 of 460
Spot on Melnibone, and your reasoning also adds weight to the problems Finance companies will face as they borrow from the banks at say x interest rate and pass these onto their customers at xxxx interest rates. I dont beleive the finance companies offer any fixed term loans.
gf.
Many thanks for that, Im going to use your example on another board where too many posters are oblivious to the problems caused by rate hikes. Many thanks again.
easty
- 03 Nov 2003 10:40
- 223 of 460
croc hi,
i'm hunting around for a long term saving plan with the best growth potential.
ive looked at fidelity.co.uk at there multimanager growth portfolio which on the face of it looks quite good.
I plan to stick away 1k a month.
i would be gratefull if you or anyone could help me out.
Many thanks
Easty
Crocodile
- 03 Nov 2003 21:47
- 225 of 460
easty I am not the best person to ask on this, according to Radio4 the other day the record on many of these savings plans is awful.
Anybody have any good ideas?
ricardopage
- 04 Nov 2003 17:23
- 226 of 460
How do you take a short position on a share?
I use a basic Self Trade account (still!) is it possible to use this type of account to short shares (not CFD's)?
Maybe I should ring them up!
Only asking as it seems much easier (for me) to spot a stock that's about to drop rather than one about to rise.
zzaxx99
- 04 Nov 2003 19:47
- 227 of 460
-- ricardopage,
You generally need an old fashioned dealer for this. Online execution-only accounts don't allow you to short unless you have an account that allows T+ settlement (ie T+10, T+20). In that case, some will allow you to sell stock that you don't have, provided you cover within the settlement period.
However, in most cases, this is either not allowed, or only allowed due to crap systems that don't check your current holding before letting you trade.
Crocodile
- 04 Nov 2003 21:34
- 228 of 460
Ricardo
Consider opening a CFD account it can be much less expensive as there is no stamp duty.
D.
dannycarswell
- 06 Nov 2003 10:10
- 229 of 460
Morning all, very basic question for the likes of you guys. p/e ratio means exactly what? many thanks!!
dannycarswell
- 06 Nov 2003 10:57
- 231 of 460
thanks LW. sorry for sounding really thick but how is that calculated.
Velocity
- 06 Nov 2003 11:14
- 233 of 460
I think the important thing to remember with p/e's is to avoid companies with excessively high ones. A company with a high p/e must have incredibubble growth to justify it's high price - so a good starting point can be to benchmark it against it's competitors in the same sector.
Fundamentalist
- 06 Nov 2003 11:28
- 235 of 460
P/E ratio is calculated by dividing the share price by the earnings per share, where the earnings per share is calculated by dividing the profit by the number of shares in issue.
So in long form, the P/E ratio is the share price multiplied by the number of shares issued divided by the annual profit
ajren
- 06 Nov 2003 11:29
- 236 of 460
I started by saying ----keep things simple
On reflection--after reading the posts -- I suggest you keep things simple
AFTER you have reached the stage of knowing above.
Velocity
- 06 Nov 2003 11:42
- 237 of 460
little woman - I did a bit of research into it, admittedly a few years ago, but the result was very marked. I looked over a timescale of years at companies with very high p/e's, and companies with very low p/e's - ie the extremes of both. I found that in the case of high p/e's the companies share price consistently underperformed those of the low p/e's for the following number of X years. All I know is that the factual evidence showed that the low p/e stocks racked up superior % share price growth vs their higher priced peers. Saying that, I would be quite happy to be proved wrong & I'm sure there are far better skilled fundamentalists out there than me.
dannycarswell
- 06 Nov 2003 12:05
- 238 of 460
cheers everone, it is all so clear now. happy trading all.
chadbukl
- 07 Nov 2003 07:54
- 239 of 460
Is there an equivalent of the TICK & TRIN for the fTSE?