niceonecyril
- 13 Jul 2005 22:40
>
http://www.investegate.co.uk/Article.aspx?id=200804020701443743R
http://www.imperialenergy.com
http://www.investegate.co.uk/Article.aspx?id=200807040700042799Y
Powered by IST's
Powered by IST's
img src="http://charts.moneyam.com/Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=IEC&Size=700&Skin=BlackBlue&Type=2&Scale=0&Span=YEAR1&MA=&EMA=&OVER=&IND=&XCycle=&XFormat=&Layout=2Line;Default;Price;HisDate&SV=0">
cyril
blanche
- 19 Sep 2007 16:40
- 221 of 896
Closed at 1060 up 15.34% well and truely above 1030. Expect this to be through 1100 tomorrow. P.S Cynic have you turned over a new leaf, Relying on things like (fingers crossed)! have fundamentals and charts and things gone out the window lol
cynic
- 19 Sep 2007 19:52
- 222 of 896
fingers crossed seems to be more effective, though it was the chart that first enticed me - that and your charm!
blanche
- 20 Sep 2007 09:31
- 223 of 896
MOSCOW, Sept 20 (Reuters) - Five Russia exploration licences have been withdrawn from units of London-listed Imperial Energy (IEC.L: Quote, Profile , Research), Russia's environmental agency Rosprirodnadzor said on Thursday.
The licences include three exploration licences of Imperial Energy's unit AlyansNefteGaz, and two exploration licences of the firm's another unit, Sibinterneft. Both units are developing oil and gas deposits in West Siberia's Tomsk region.
Reuters 2007. All Rights Reserved. | Learn more about
blanche
- 20 Sep 2007 09:31
- 224 of 896
GIVE A BLOODY BREAK !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
niceonecyril
- 20 Sep 2007 09:52
- 225 of 896
Just read recommends ? SP in some sort of recovery?
cyril
blanche
- 20 Sep 2007 09:55
- 226 of 896
CRAZY !!!!
blanche
- 20 Sep 2007 09:58
- 227 of 896
You could of just brought at 9 ish 10 mins ago.
niceonecyril
- 20 Sep 2007 10:02
- 228 of 896
Seems its a big con, the Rospir does NOT HAVE THE POWER TO WITHDRAW.
Rosendra responsable for licences, has stated NONE OF ITS LICENCES ARE TO BE WITHDRAWN.
They noted some licences required siemics within 3 months. dated 1st June.
cyril
blanche
- 20 Sep 2007 10:03
- 229 of 896
Ruskies probally panicing the market to aquire some more cheap shares. Think company should issue statement.
niceonecyril
- 20 Sep 2007 10:24
- 230 of 896
It maybe that these 5 licence are the ones that IEC voluntary gave up?
must go v busy
cyril
blanche
- 20 Sep 2007 10:30
- 231 of 896
Imperial Energy Falls Behind on Developing Fields, Russia Says
By Greg Walters and Torrey Clark
Sept. 20 (Bloomberg) -- Imperial Energy Plc, a London-traded company that produces oil in Russia, has fallen behind in developing some of its fields, Russia's Natural Resources Ministry said.
The ministry revoked five development licenses from Imperial Energy around the second quarter of last year, Oleg Mitvol, deputy head of the ministry's environmental watchdog agency, said by telephone in Moscow today.
Imperial Energy fell 0.8 percent to 1,052 pence in London trading as of 9:52 a.m., paring a decline of as much as 15 percent.
A spokesman for Imperial Energy declined to comment immediately on the statement.
To contact the reporter on this story: Greg Walters in Moscow gwalters1@bloomberg.net
cynic
- 20 Sep 2007 10:38
- 232 of 896
i bravely bought a few more at 950 this morning, but may well cash them in later today as that takes me seriously o'weight here.
IEC say the staements ex Russia are a load of bollocks, but detail as to exactly why etc still not available here though perhaps via Bloomberg
cynic
- 20 Sep 2007 11:28
- 233 of 896
LONDON (Thomson Financial) - Imperial Energy Corp PLC has denied a press report claiming some of its licenses in Russia have been annulled by the government.
'In response to press speculation this morning, Imperial Energy states that no licenses have been withdrawn,' the company said in a statement.
Russian news agency Interfax today reported, quoting a statement from the Natural Resources Ministry, that the federal resource use agency Rosnedra has annulled five hydrocarbon exploration licenses held by Imperial Energy in the Tomsk region.
Imperial Energy, in reaction, called the Ministry's statement 'materially misleading with significant factual inaccuracies'.
'Imperial rejects suggestions that it is behind on work at Nord Imperial. Other licenses referred to have been relinquished by the company two years ago due to lack of prospectivity,' it said.
blanche
- 20 Sep 2007 11:34
- 234 of 896
Cynic, Ive no spare cash. So i think you did the right thing buying more.
cynic
- 20 Sep 2007 11:39
- 235 of 896
fortunately in the last few days i have recovered shirt, tie and socks and arguably shoes too!
blanche
- 20 Sep 2007 11:44
- 236 of 896
You never know you could 15% up on your purchase by end of the day (FINGERS CROSSED!!)
blanche
- 20 Sep 2007 11:53
- 237 of 896
Got to go out to an antiques auction for hour or two. Hopefully we will have a detailed rns from the company, then everything will be rosey in the garden again.
cynic
- 20 Sep 2007 12:01
- 238 of 896
it won't be that good, but no doubt IEC or the Russian govnt will have to respond further to the RNS i posted above
niceonecyril
- 20 Sep 2007 13:22
- 239 of 896
The company will issue a full and correct statement shortly, with more detail.
cyril
cynic
- 20 Sep 2007 16:13
- 240 of 896
sorry it's a bit long .... typical Russian pressure being applied - see the last line!
Imperial Energy Corp PLC has denied a press report claiming five of its licences have been annulled by the Russian resource use regulator Rosnedra.
Russian news agency Interfax today reported, quoting a statement from the Natural Resources Ministry, that Rosnedra cancelled three licenses held by Imperial unit Alyansneftegas and a further two held by another unit, Sibinterneft.
The Alyansneftegaz permits will expire in December this year and the Sibinterneft licences on March 2008.
'Imperial Energy states that no licenses have been withdrawn,' the company said in a statement.
Imperial pointed out certain licenses referred to by the Ministry have been relinquished by the group two years ago due to 'lack of prospectivity'.
It also rejected accusations by the Ministry that some of the projects, operated by Nord Imperial LLC, were behind schedule.
'The statement issued by the Ministry of Natural Resources... is materially misleading with significant factual inaccuracies,' the company said.
The news came a day after Imperial revealed the Russian Commission For Natural Resources Reserves (GKZ) has confirmed and approved the oil and gas reserves for the group's Sredneglukhovskoye field in western Siberia.
GKZ's approved reserves for the site -- located on Block 70 in the Tomsk region -- totaled 39.7 mln barrels, better than the 25 mln barrels of proved and probable reserves estimated by independent auditor DeGolyer and MacNaughton at end-2006.
The approval, which sent Imperial's shares soaring by as much as 15 pct on Wednesday, will allow the company apply for a commercial production licence for the field.
However, Interfax claimed, in a separate article, that GKZ is reviewing the reserves data submitted by Imperial.