Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).

Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.

cheers GF.

Ha ha ha!!!!!

People taking points for each other is pretty common. People sometimes give false alibis and it is the same offence - perverting the course of justice. The false alibi people rarely get prosecuted unless it is a high profile case. Hulme and his wife were dealt with the way they were because they are public figures. If it had been other people, I think they would have got off with probation or community service. People frequently give the name and address of someone abroad as the driver of the car for speeding. I know of two Turkish people who have claimed that a visiting friend was driving their car at the time. In both cases the police wrote to the person in Turkey and the case was dropped.

See Cameron is ducking his promises once again.

There must be more skid marks outside the No10 bunker than anywhere in the UK

----------------------------------

"Press regulation talks 'break down'

Lord Justice Leveson's report on press regulation was published in November
Continue reading the main story
The Leveson report

Report at a glance
Q&A: The Leveson Inquiry
Victims react
After Leveson - what now?
Cross-party talks on the Leveson press reforms have broken down as David Cameron said the gap between the three main parties is "too great" to bridge, the BBC understands.

The prime minister is to publish plans for a Royal Charter to establish a new tougher press regulator on Monday."


The opposition is concerned the plans would allow newspaper owners too much discretion over the press regulation.

He is licking the arses of the press again.

Hypocrisy!

Why is he frightened of statutory legal regulation?

He seems to me, to be taking another walk down Corruption Lane.

Cameron is right. Statutory control of the press is very dangerous. Once there is a statute then politicians can amend it to suit them. It is the thin end of the wedge. How easily could the press have reported on MP's expenses if there had been a press control law. Press freedom is something that sets our country apart from others. Labour like statutory regulation because their answer to everything is to legislate.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/blairs-frenzied-law-making--a-new-offence-for-every-day-spent-in-office-412072.html

2006
Tony Blair's government has created more than 3,000 new criminal offences during its nine-year tenure, one for almost every day it has been in power.

Blair introduced 54% more laws than Thatcher.

Hays,

"perverting the course of justice"

There are different problems in the Hulme case:
1) Whether you think speeding is dangerous, or not, Hulme decided that he could still break the law when he wished to by exceeding the speed limit, in spite of having been fined and having points on his licence.
2) This means that when he ignored the law and contrary to the opinion of many he may have presented a danger to the public.
3) His previous fines and points had not persuaded him to change his “habits”.
4) His attempt to pervert the “course of justice” was therefore an avoidance of his responsibility and perhaps to continue aberrant behaviour.
5) The consequences of him continuing to drive would maybe to continue endangering the public.
6) That is why his “crime” was important and why deliberate “perverting the course of justice” needs custodial sentencing.
7) I feel sorry for him being foolish, but he created his own problems.
8) But sadly it seems the standards of the political leadership of the country

==========================

"I know of two Turkish people who have claimed that a visiting friend was driving their car at the time. In both cases the police wrote to the person in Turkey and the case was dropped."

If the above is suggesting that the two Turkish people were making “false claims”, then once again think you that you seem to keep “strange” company.

Hays,

Cameron is protecting the remnants of the tory party, not the public from abuse by the press.

---------------------

Legislation, will not prevent "justifiable" investigation, but may stop the "gutter press" from persecutory intrusive "investigation" into "privacy".

(If the newspapers print information, which they can justify later in court of law as being in the public interest, they should not have any fears.)

--------

Fred
You must lead a sheltered life. There is plenty of minor crime that goes undetected and unpunished (even plenty of major crime). I worked in the East End for about 8 years some time ago. I came across crime on a daily basis. It might be arranging to have a car 'stolen' to claim the insurance, people stealing the stock at the depot/factory for wine and spirits where I worked to fairly violent crimes. Probably about a quarter or even more of the people who worked there were involved in some sort of criminal enterprise at some point. For sections of the population, crime of some sort is a way of life. I used to drink in the social club there and we used to play chess. There was no shortage of players. The deal was that if you could play chess then either you were posh or you had been in prison. I worked as an IT consultant there so was regarded as posh.

Hays,

Not so.

I play chess and have dealt with a quite a few villains and even murderers, but, so far, have escaped being imprisoned or even worse been called "posh". Other epithets have been frequently used about me.

Also, met many who had dubious habits and methods of dealing.

But, being less than pure in all my actions in the past, consider myself lucky, but aware of human fallibility and sometimes have difficulty in condemning too harshly "some" others.

Surely a classic oxymoron "Cherie Bliar blogs on politics"

Had an e-mail from Microsoft re a free download of IE10, anyone have any helpful comments of if its any good or not.

Off twitter....

Dave Camoron ‏@EtonOldBoys

New game, at PMQs drink a shot every-time Cameron says it all Labours Fault, you will be pissed out your head in just 10 mins

Hi Goldfinger,

You are right re being pised, but if you are teetotal you could always have a shot every time Labour admit they were wrong.

This is too true to be funny.

The next time you hear a politician use the Word 'billion' in a casual manner, think about whether you want the 'politicians' spending
YOUR tax money.

A billion is a difficult number to comprehend, but one advertising agency did a good job of putting that figure into some perspective.

A billion seconds ago it was 1959.

A billion minutes ago Jesus was alive.

A billion hours ago our ancestors were Living in the Stone Age.

A billion days ago no-one walked on the earth on two feet.

A billion Pounds ago was only 13 hours and 12 minutes,
and at the rate our government is spending it.

Stamp Duty, Tobacco Tax, Corporation Tax, Income Tax, Council Tax, Fishing License Tax, Petrol/Diesel Tax, Capital Gains Tax, Inheritance Tax (tax on top of tax), Alcohol Tax, V.A.T. Marriage License Tax, Property Tax, Service charge taxes, Social Security Tax, Vehicle License Registration Tax, Vehicle Sales Tax, Workers Compensation Tax.
And probably a few more not mentioned!

STILL THINK THIS IS FUNNY?

Not one of these taxes existed 100 years ago...
And our nation was one of the most prosperous in the world.

We had absolutely no national debt...
We had the largest middle class in the world...
And Mum stayed home to raise the kids.

What happened?

'Politicians!'


I hope this goes around the UK at least 100 times































































































































































































































© 2013 Microsoft
Terms
Privacy & cookies
Developers
English (United Kingdom)

Please define Middle Classes.


------------

Is the a list of present "accommodation" expenses being claimed MPs for "second properties" and "rentals" in London?

-----------

my goodness fred, you really are so DULL AND REPETITIVE .... and don't let us forget, YOU DON'T EVEN VOTE, regarding it as a badge of honour .... dipstick is as polite as one can get

If you don't vote then you lose the right to complain. Every single person in this country should use their vote. Usually I have found that it's the people who don't vote who mouth off and complain the most.

Is Fred Registered to vote - now that will stir a hornetts nest!!!!!

Oh Dear - what have I just said? Going to carry on watching Red Nose Day Programme - it is safer than me commenting.