for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm

S&M director post not attractive now there is no chairman for executive vice.

I am probably wrong but I think maybe HW & IB walked rather than were pushed, would it not require another EGM to force them out?
kim

I assume that IB and HW are still employed by the company under their contracts of employment, otherwise I think the RNS would have mentioned they had left the employment of the company?? But clearly the strategic management of the company has now moved on from the early stages of these two taking the company down the road of IP development.

Perhaps they will remain board directors of subsidiary operations, perhaps they have been given notice and there will be substantial redundancy payments due.

I wonder where Philip Lovegrove stands in all this - I guess part of the new rather than ancien regime with MW, Clive Warner as FD and Terry Robbins as COO - plus new Sales Director?

Could this really have been a done deal pre-placiung without it being mentioned in the placing docs - bit irregular, but I suppose there is no proof of it. Or was it a much more recent confrontation, or simple self-realisation that they would not fit with the new regime?

Perhaps we cannot be told until their final deaprture has been fully lawyered.

SP ticked up on the offer if not the bid to start with. Now slightly down on the offer, bid holding at 1.65 in faced of a few PI sells - v. low volume so far.

SD I agree, I think they are still employed by SEO in some form.
kim

We do not know they have gone, only no longer on main Board. We have seen HW being eased aside over recent weeks but I wonder about IB. Following HW being pushed he may have walked, or threatened to do so and the bluff failed.

Or IB may still be there but just in a technical role on the BioTec side. The RNS issued at 16.09 yesterday said "the Company has been informed by certain persons discharging managerial responsibilities that..". Nothing past in that, yet by the time that was issued the Board meeting referred to less than 30 minutes later was surely over and the Statement prepared.

The Chairman promised last Monday that RNSs would henceforth be clear and unambiguous !!

But then again, did IB cock it up big time over the IP licencing that became aparent with SPhere?

SD - snap !

The Prospectus tells us IB's Service Agreement had a 3 months notice and (interestingly, or is it standard?) "There is no provisions for compensation for early termination, although Mr Balchin may be entitled to submit a claim for breach of contracts should the service agreement be terminated early by the Company."

HW's said "No notice period is specified"

It is possible that SEO's M&AA restricts the number of Directors to 6, and that the company wants to appoint 2 new Directors so that 2 had to step aside?
kim

6?! - hardly likely is it?

anyway, just change the M&A to accommodate more if you want them

The M&AA can only be amended on majority vote SD.
kim

So . . . have an EGM. Oh they had one last week and forgot to include it, silly boys.

They would not need an EGM, the Board would be responsible for a change to M&AA, but my thinking is that they may not want too many Directors "Too many Directors spoil the company" and all that stuff..........oh yes, they already did!!
kim

No mention of Director changes in the press?
I would have thought it would have been reported in the FT at least - especially as it was the 'founders' of the modern SEO.

The Press are probably waiting for the follow up appointments/announcements..
saves paper and ink (in keeping with the theme)

Another possibility, HW & IB's replacements first have to resign posts elsewhere due to conflict of interest and RNS' have not yet been released for them? Or just a case of "I'm not playing if those two are" Step aboard Mr Bond and Miss Moneypenny, we need you NOW!
kim

just hope that this departure is not caused by those two screwing up one of the potential contracts!!!!! FT last week mentionned that macdonalds was about to enter into a contract with seo on starwrap. How come nothing is on the table yet?(after all if FT know the story then this event has to be imminent)

I think it was inevitable that IB and HW had to step aside given the lack of progress and destruction of the mkt. cap. over the last 6 months. The emergency Placing so soon after the market was tapped for money before is reason enough for the City's lack of confidence. It might want the FD's head as well. I am interested in seeing who will be appointed to the Board since that will give a good pointer as to whether the institution tyhink SEO is a long term investment or they are in it for a quick turn round and then sell.

Tony.My old comp would not let me download the file or I'm doing something wrong!! But many thanks for the mail. cheers.

Just heard the bit re the Queens speech re climate change/environment and it appears the government are trying as expected to out do the Tories on the issue.
The issue was one of the main subjects mentioned.
OK, personally I don't think any politician cares about anything apart from his/her next pay cheque and expenses, but if the environmental issue means votes the government will want to be seen as the greener party. At least attempt to cut said emissions will be made.
In my opinion the best way to be seen to do something is cutting waste. Penalties for more wasteful companies, and higher costs to dispose of said waste, cant do SEO's case any harm.
Its a shame we cant bottle all the hot air put out by politicians. If we did we could heat the whole planet.
There so full of wind I know where I would stick a wind farm.

boldtrader
I had same problem and forwarded it to a pal with more up to date equipment who printed it out for me. Email your postal address and I'll send copies.