Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).

Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.

cheers GF.

a few weeks ago i posted about curry houses putting god and cat and dog food in curries well this morning it is big headlines on sky news.

CYNIC said i was as good as a liar .
i new about what was going in to currys in london and posted it
any one who goes and eats in takeaway must be mad it is full of sh.t
not fit for humans to eat
that is why cancer is getting worse .

not fit for humans to eat ...... that is why cancer is getting worse
now all school children know that 2+2=4; occasionally you'll hear of someone reckoning 2+2=5; here, nobel prizewinner for medicine (MrT) shows how 2+2=7!

=============

and by the way, our prizewinner seems to have got his reporting a bit squiffy too .... according to BBC3 via that bastion of accurate reporting "The Daily Mirror" ......

Dog or cat in our curry: Fears over 'mystery meat' in takeaway which has baffled experts
DNA tests ruled out lamb. beef, chicken, pork, goat, horse – and even human flesh - leaving the grim possibility it could be dog or cat


strange, but no mention of it being dog or cat food, but merely the Real McCoy!

to eat food that you have no idea what they put him them
is for idiot
takeaway restaurants are mostly dirty places go round te back and open your eyes .
the stuff they put in thm would mae you sick if you saw it being put in .
anythin goes in FACT and it very are for them to wash their hands

three brothers want o buy a tv they put in £10 each making £30
when the one brother gets to the shop he gets the tv for £25 so he puts £ 2 in is back pocket and does not tell is brothers about the £2 and says he got it cheaper which he gave the three of them £1 each back which makes them paying £9 each
plus the £ 2 in is back pocket making it £ 29
what happend to the other £1

answer that cynic

he took it himself silly boy, thus giving himself £3

==============

eat food that you have no idea what they put him them ..... so eat Ukipper only made from unusustainable north sea herring, unsustainable english oak chips; best viewed with a mirror to avoid getting the smoke in your eyes

Dreams and Hays.

Maybe I had a poor education, and I do realise how little I know about so much, but at least the education I had, help me to have an interesting occupation, which has provided a sufficient income to secure a reasonable living, pension and enjoyable life. So it couldn’t have been that bad.

Hays,

You have rejected theism and seemed to have replaced it with an unhealthy belief in capitalism as your Raison d'être.

You both seem to suitable cannon fodder for the modern tory party hanging on to like grim life to outdated ideologies.

Mind you should believe the priests’ declarations handed down by word of mouth from head office.

(Do you roll you left or right trouser legs up as well?)

Ps,

What U-turn is this farcical government going to announce to-day?

No wonder, business is not investing or expanding.

Dreams and Hays,

Don't have a heart attack this weekend, as you may be part of the impending chaos in emergency services.

Will it be another U-turn in the rushed policies to dismantle the NHS. may lead to chaos.

Seems, as if the coalition's rush to dismantle the NHS is on.


BMA writes to NHS boss over 111 'concerns'

"Dr John Hughes says the 111 service could put lives at risk
Non-emergency 111 number launched
The organisation representing British doctors has written to NHS bosses to call for a delay in the launch of a new non-emergency telephone advice line.


The 111 service, replacing NHS Direct, is due to launch in England on Monday.

The British Medical Association's letter to Sir David Nicholson follows reported problems in trial areas.

Health Minister Lord Howe has said some areas will have more time to go live with 111 while "thorough testing" to ensure reliability is carried out.

Lord Howe has already admitted the new 111 telephone advice service - which the government has said will ease pressure on emergency 999 phone lines - had run into "teething problems".

But the BMA said that in several areas it seemed to have been completely unable to cope with call volumes or suffered severe IT failures."

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-21963297

D and h,

Another point about education and the chances of a tory government after next election is that the populace of the UK is relatively well educated.

But the more important thing is that by 2015 the voters will have the information before their eyes and be witness to the general decay of the UK society over the 5years of tory occupation.

My guess, at the moment, is that labour will be returned to office, I hope that it is not with too much of a majority.

Nightmare,

Perhaps, you don't like the messages.

8-)

cynic your noty very bright
they put 10 pounds each then got 1 pound back 3 times 9 is 27 plus is back pocket 2 pounds makes 29pounds
it is a mathmatical error ever one knows this
you are just a fool
not bright at all just a self made pillock

Dil
I think you are being obtuse.

"The situation would have been the same no matter which government was in power, except it would have been worse under Labour."

This referred to the situation, not the response. The situation would have been the same, such as a deep recession in the EU and the UK's finances being worse than Labour admitted. The response would have been different with Labour still having to make deep cuts as they admit and borrowing heavily. The time to make cuts is when the economy is at a low. If you make the cuts when the economy is growing then you stall the growth. History has shown us that the Labour party only knows 'tax and spend' and 'borrow and spend'.

Tanker,

Sorry, but your statements are misleading.

The statements are misconstrued and deductions are wrong.

There is no missing quid, it wasn't allowed for.

Tink about it, but for god sake don't ask Hays or the nightmare to help you!

Fred
If anything is outdated it is the Labour party's belief in the theories of Keynes. The principle is that it is worth paying people to dig holes and then fill them in again. That may seem silly, but it is a direct quote from Keynes. Keynes famously said that you could stimulate the economy by paying people to build pyramids, or to dig holes and fill them back up again. Now doesn't that sound like the Labour party.

Hays,

Cameron's, Osborne's and your economics theories are simplistic and unrelated to the real economy, as can be seen.

Also, slowly Osborne is slowly rejecting his previous stances, but the "market" has no faith in him.

As Dil suggested, if I were you I would re-read your statement and reform it. Basically, it is as daft as your economics seems to be.

Hays, they were analogies to help individuals like you to understand the model.

Sadly, he failed.

But, in one way the market has many holes in it.

fred 3 £10 =30 you give back to the £1 so they then paid 9 not knowing that he put 2 in is pocket plus the 27 =29

this is as old as the hills

There's not necessarily anything wrong with his ideas, but Keynes' policies are really only intended for use during a recession.

The problem is that they were being used during the boom years when they shouldn't have been. As a result, there's no money in the coffers now to implement the infrastructure investment advocated by Keynes, so you've got to have austerity whether you like it or not.

not if you're fred you don't .... he knows (from his comfy armchair) absolutely how this gov't has done everything wrong, and therefore by elimination, knows exactly what they should have done - hahahaha!

Tanker,

It's not difficult to see that you're a mathematical genius.

Tell me please, what is the Nash Equilibrium in the following game between Kuwait and Saudi Arabia?

The payoffs are net profits to each from producing millions of barrels of oil per day. If 5 million barrels per day are produced then the profit margins are £16 per barrel. If 6 million barrels per day are produced then the profit margins are £12 per barrel and they are £8 per barrel if 7 million barrels per day are supplied.



I'm sure you won't need it, but here's a clue if you get stuck.