littlebert2
- 22 Oct 2013 10:54
- 227 of 320
I'm guessing from the SP drop and all the 227 trades, those that were forced by Equiniti to take paper certs have gotten them cleared into their nom accounts ;-)
Martini
- 23 Oct 2013 18:59
- 228 of 320
New high close. Still lots of 227 trades but being mopped up and at higher prices.
Fred1new
- 23 Oct 2013 19:13
- 229 of 320
Manuel.
Always believed in a intertwining of the state and capitalism.
Both needs the restraints of one on the other to have a reasonable balance progressive society.
The balance at the moment does not appear beneficial for long term benefit of all of UK society.
======
Martini,
You are doing well.
Good luck to you.
I am out, but still watching.
But noticed volumes are down and expect it to trade sideways or retreat a little.
I will wait until the dust settles.
Not unhappy with my profit.
I put rewards with a bit more into GKN, on Manuel "tip".
cynic
- 23 Oct 2013 20:22
- 230 of 320
long term benefit of all of UK society
in your opinion, with which all may not agree, when was that ever so?
Fred1new
- 23 Oct 2013 20:33
- 231 of 320
Seemingly so, Atlee period, McMillan period and many other periods when the balance was tilted to the majority and not the "few".
Read your history of social reforms.
Stan
- 23 Oct 2013 21:03
- 232 of 320
Fred, Alf hasn't got time to read anything Cos' he's always on here... when he's supposed to be working.
cynic
- 23 Oct 2013 22:01
- 233 of 320
ah yes
you've never had it so good
the pound in your pocket
etc etc
the wind of change does not seem to have brought much peace, joy and prosperity to africa either
btw, check out the advantages of "retiring" but being retained on a long term consultancy :-)
Stan
- 23 Oct 2013 22:36
- 234 of 320
Retire? What you ha! before you can retire who must have worked and I see little evidence of that me old china, also consulting who, about what? And just how long is long term?
These are the sort of questions we need answers to... and we need to know now -);
cynic
- 24 Oct 2013 08:20
- 235 of 320
there's now 4 years of the consultancy left, renewable thereafter
and your next Q?
Stan
- 24 Oct 2013 08:25
- 236 of 320
I asked 4 questions and you have only answered 1... So 3 to go please? -):
cynic
- 24 Oct 2013 08:46
- 237 of 320
234 is one Q; i do not see 3 others, though i'm not greatly interested anyway
Stan
- 24 Oct 2013 09:16
- 238 of 320
Out now, But I will deal with you later... Meanwhile you have work to do.
cynic
- 24 Oct 2013 10:17
- 239 of 320
i can scarcely wait .... indeed, am almost wetting myself in anticipation
Fred1new
- 24 Oct 2013 11:13
- 240 of 320
Weren't you one of Maggie's wets.
cynic
- 24 Oct 2013 11:16
- 241 of 320
no, just one of her "vegetables" :-)
Stan
- 24 Oct 2013 12:54
- 242 of 320
I hope that you have managed to dry up... Now how about answering those outstanding Questions?
cynic
- 24 Oct 2013 17:38
- 243 of 320
what questions and even if reiterated, i may just tell you to myob, which is prob what they warrant :-)
Stan
- 24 Oct 2013 17:53
- 244 of 320
Oh so you have finally emerged from your 3 hour liquid lunch break have you, myob?... What the hell does that mean then -):
cynic
- 24 Oct 2013 19:01
- 245 of 320
Mind Your Own Business :-)
doodlebug4
- 24 Oct 2013 21:19
- 246 of 320
Terry Macalister
The Guardian, Thursday 24 October 2013 19.37 BST
One of the world's largest investment banks told ministers ahead of the Royal Mail flotation that they could sell the postal business for £10bn, around two and a half times more than the government finally received for it.
News of the valuation from JP Morgan re-ignited the huge row over the privatisation with Billy Hayes, the postal workers union leader, claiming a "conspiracy against the taxpayer" and demanding the sacking of Vince Cable as business secretary.
The government sold shares in Royal Mail for 330p each, valuing the business at £3.3bn on 11 October. But the shares rocketed in value by almost 40% that day alone and closed at 529p, making the company worth more than £5bn.
The official float figure excluded around £800m of debt, which included would give the state-owned business an "enterprise value" of £4.1bn but still almost £6bn lower than the price tag suggested by JP Morgan.
The US bank declined to comment but well-placed sources confirmed the figure of £10bn and made clear that others pitching to sell the Royal Mail on behalf of the government had also priced the mail company as high as £7bn.
The Department of Business said a whole range of different price tags had been put on Royal Mail at different stages of the sell-off process which was conducted in the most thorough way. "The banks' proposals came months before any threat of strike action by the unions, financial market uncertainty in the United States and other factors which the government has already said were taken into consideration in setting a price for the company in September," said a spokesman.
Hayes, the general secretary of the Communication Workers Union, said: "On the opening day of the flotation Vince Cable wrote off the undervaluation as froth. A week later, we were told it was the fault of the CWU. We now have a prima facie case of a conspiracy against the UK taxpayer who were opposed to the sale and have now been robbed of billions. In any other walk of life this would be a sacking offence and we call on Vince Cable to resign. A full inquiry should be launched into the mis-handling of this unnecessary privatisation by Vince Cable. We would also like the matter to be referred to the public accounts committee to scrutinise how badly the taxpayer has been left out of pocket.
Chuka Umunna, the shadow business secretary, said the development only added to fears that taxpayers have been significantly "short-changed by David Cameron's Royal Mail fire sale".
He added: "Vince Cable has said that taxpayer value was 'central' to the government's strategy in selling Royal Mail but given the extensive consultation with institutional investors and banks which took place, both he and the prime minister have serious questions to answer.
"Crucially, they must explain when the Government was made aware that the sale was so massively oversubscribed by major investors and why, having considered a higher price, they rejected that option.
"We have called for a full investigation into this matter so it is welcome that the National Audit Office has announced it will be looking into the deal and publishing its findings in the Spring."But Whitehall sources said it was not surprising that banks pitching for business might overplay the value of Royal Mail in the hope that they would win the work. They said it was like an estate agent coming round to have a look at a house and trying to persuade the owners to hire them by offering the best price available, but without the full knowledge at that point of all the circumstances.
Over 21 investment banks offered their services in May and their appointment was overseen by another City institution, Lazard. The spokesman for the Department of Business added yesterday: "The proposals included indicative valuations of the company based, in many instances, solely on information already in the public domain. Banks made their own assumptions of Royal Mail's future performance. The range was wide with the median around £3.6bn taking into account [an] IPO [initial public offering] discount." Among the banks that did win the work were Goldman Sachs and UBS.