Andy
- 20 May 2006 20:50

I have been reading about Subsea resources, and I will be keeping an eye on the stock, as their first salvage operation is imminent, and it will be interesting to see what level of sucess they can achieve, measured against their expectations.


SubSea Resources has been formed to salvage cargoes from cargo ships that have been lost in deep water. Only a handful of wrecks have been salvaged in water depths exceeding 1000 metres, whereas hundreds have been worked on in depths down to 300 metres. The barrier to deeper work has been a lack of technology, which is now available mainly due to developments in the offshore oil and gas industry.
Sonar scan of wreck
SubSea Resources has identified at least 70 commercial salvage targets and has identified twenty major target vessels containing cargoes with a gross value of over $450 million (based on recent LME metal prices and contemporary lading records). In the first phase of the companys business plan it aims to raise the cargoes from six of these vessels over the next three years.
In addition, it is anticipated that certain historic cargoes may be integrated with the commercial salvage operations. Some of the historic targets have potential values of many millions of dollars each, bringing the combined value of identified historic and commercial targets to well over $1 billion.


Initial Salvage Targets
SubSea Resources has an initial programme to salvage the cargos of six commercial wrecks in the period to 31 March 2008. The gross value of these six wrecks is estimated at US$180 million.
The wrecks allow for a mix of weather conditions - allowing for both northern summer and winter working conditions. All wrecks are in international waters and all of the cargoes will be recovered through contracts with the legal owners. The water depths range from below 1500 meters to 5000+ meters.
Corporate website : http://www.subsearesources.com/index.php
seawallwalker
- 12 Feb 2007 15:40
- 227 of 382
I think this is heading towards liquidation.
(All imo and I am guessing, no advice given!)
seawallwalker
- 12 Feb 2007 15:46
- 229 of 382
driver - who dares wins!
I'm too scared to jump on board a waterlogged ship!
Good luck in your journey, I'll be watching if only to see you win your bet.
canada1
- 12 Feb 2007 16:33
- 230 of 382
To be fair, they only said they had 1200 wrecks to locate, they said nothing about being competent enough to find one that works !
cynic
- 12 Feb 2007 16:35
- 231 of 382
the only thing that didn't work was the finance!
seawallwalker
- 12 Feb 2007 16:38
- 232 of 382
Just been looking back at the finance especially the float at 40 pence.
Ouch!!
cynic
- 12 Feb 2007 16:42
- 233 of 382
should have added .... unless you were a founder director who cashed in some chips to allow the float
compoundup
- 12 Feb 2007 17:28
- 235 of 382
IMO it is still worth watching this because of the IP. The database of wreck locations and the established rights to salvage have some value. Just because those who have tried so far haven't succeeded doesn't mean that it won't be done in due course.
Let Davy Jones look after the metals a while longer.
P.S. I never held these and congratulate cynic for having been right all along.
cynic
- 12 Feb 2007 17:45
- 237 of 382
did not feel i was very clever ..... merely said all along that it was a fascinating subject (and thus stock) to watch ..... always very very very high risk, regardless of what Shares Mag may have said (think they thought it wonderful at some point)
mg
- 12 Feb 2007 18:01
- 238 of 382
If my memory serves me well I was approached, some years ago, to get involved with these - before they came to market. As with cynic - found their idea/concept fascinating but far too risky - even for me !!!
Have watched on the sidelines - quite amazed that they got it away at the launch price. Bad luck to all those who invested for the dream. I think they will struggle to get further investors involved. It was always a high risk now, I'm afraid, they appear like a bunch of enthusiasts who couldn't make the business concept stack up.
Big Al
- 12 Feb 2007 21:28
- 239 of 382
I've watched this lot with interest for quite a long time.
I'm quite amazed that "Ella" suddenly turns out to be questionable. The company has been pushing it as a prospect for about a couple of years. It seems astonishing that they are suddenly not sure.
I'd suggest we short this mutha into oblivion as the management are plainly taking the market for a ride.
Al
;-)
seawallwalker
- 12 Feb 2007 23:30
- 240 of 382
I think you are completely correct Big Al.
seawallwalker
- 12 Feb 2007 23:30
- 241 of 382
.
seawallwalker
- 12 Feb 2007 23:32
- 242 of 382
.
Oh dear there's that dot again
smiler o
- 13 Feb 2007 09:04
- 243 of 382
LONDON (AFX) - Yesterday's downbeat trading update continued to weigh on Subsea Resources, which dipped 1/2 more to 5-3/4 pence.
The deep water recovery specialist warned it is unlikely to secure the large recovery vessel needed to complete the salvage project code-named Celia for the 2007 season.
Subsea also said a wreck it previously announced was a 19th century bullion wreck code-named Ella has not definitively been proven to be the Ella.
newsdesk@afxnews.com
fjb/vjt
Andy
- 13 Feb 2007 11:36
- 244 of 382
The story just goes from bad to worse!
Quite a shame really, there was a spirit of adventure about holding this stock, and early promise has just evaporated.
Big Al
- 13 Feb 2007 12:08
- 245 of 382
Must admit they were an outfit I considered several times, but never jumped in. Lucky for me I guess.
canada1
- 13 Feb 2007 16:27
- 246 of 382
Just rang the Royal Navy to see if they can do something with one of their ships, they're going to get back to me !!