Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

stanelco .......a new thread (SEO)     

bosley - 20 Feb 2004 09:34

Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&SiChart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&Si

for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm


pinnacle - 07 Dec 2006 16:06 - 22869 of 27111

PM1 believes his own propaganda!!

I believe in positive news from the original source.

Why should we not be sceptical after all the let downs.

It's time for them to prove themselves.

greekman - 07 Dec 2006 16:15 - 22870 of 27111

Although the latest from PM1 gives ratings of packaging types, it does not state anything we don't already know regarding SEO products. Interesting article all the same. The article is fact, not propaganda.
But as Pinnacle says, "It's time for them to prove themselves".

automatic - 07 Dec 2006 17:02 - 22871 of 27111

Rumour on iii USA office closed , all sacked on 30 nov, ANYONE???

automatic - 07 Dec 2006 17:12 - 22872 of 27111

above post seems to be true

automatic - 07 Dec 2006 17:15 - 22873 of 27111

We must have numerous orders in the USA to close the SEO office over there??, think its about time we had a RNS

greekman - 07 Dec 2006 17:16 - 22874 of 27111

Automatic,


The problem with the SEO thread on the site you mention is that there are more children posting on it than any thread on any site I have come across. It has got so bad it became a waste of space reading the posts.
Often there are 20 plus posts in less than 1 hour all spouting the same insulting comments to each other.
Not saying it's not true re the USA office, just will treat as rumor until I see substance.
By the way, not having a go at you, as I except you are asking re any substance.
When this rumor first circulated a poster replied that "If it is true, it maybe that the staff have done their job re selling the idea of SEO products and are no longer needed". You makes up your own mind.

automatic - 07 Dec 2006 17:34 - 22875 of 27111

greekman
thanks for reply, and i do know what you mean aboutchildren posting, just that one of the posters isn't usualy like that, ah well we will see

johnny the fox - 07 Dec 2006 17:41 - 22876 of 27111

I haven't posted here for over 12 months now having sold when the sp peaked at 28p. But here we are a year down the line and still no orders, no contracts, no cash flow to speak of, the hat has been passed around yet again to the tune of 'only another' 15mill should see us ok. Even more dilution etc etc.

Correct me but to date seo has not delivered anything but a big fat zero on everything it was supposed to have in the pipeline. (What happened to Greenseal the saviour of the planet? 100's of machines were supposed to be up and running by now. Is there one? What happened to the cig filter sale or the letters of intent, or frogpack, the list goes on.)

I lost faith on this co's ability to deliver a long time ago.

I feel very sorry for people still holding in the mis-begotten belief that one day a miracle will happen.

Apologies for being negative but I don't have sentiments where non performing co's are concerned

JTF

aldwickk - 07 Dec 2006 18:53 - 22877 of 27111

That about sums it up in 1 post.

pinnacle - 07 Dec 2006 19:55 - 22878 of 27111

Which actual web site quotes the closure of the USA office?

aldwickk - 07 Dec 2006 20:07 - 22879 of 27111

iii

EWRobson - 07 Dec 2006 20:21 - 22880 of 27111

Well done, Jimmy. I did take some profits at 28p but held on to too much for too long on the descent (although finally out at 7.75p). However, I suspect that you have come to have a look and may not be up-to-date. Its also clear that many posters are carrying over a mindset from the operations pre the fund-raising. I suggest that the best mindset is to try to forget the history: with Schroders involved and two key directors gone the management of the company has fundamentally changed. What does SEO have that makes it worth the current cap. of 35m (and maybe several times that next year)? A set of innovative products; marketing positions with some key players in the consumer product world. We don't know when contracts will emerge (I am happy that they will emerge with Schroders involvement because they would not invest if they were not convinced) but, under the new regime, we will not get misleading RNSs so will have to wait for the hard news.

Eric

pinnacle - 07 Dec 2006 23:10 - 22881 of 27111

There is not that many staff left working for Stanelco!!

I think someone is getting the wrong end of the stick ( I hope ) - the 15 people made redundant was done some time ago.

With regard to the USA office - I do not think it did much anyway - however I do not see the logic of orders in the pipeline.

As I have said before, it is taking too long for these contracts to be signed - In my opinion there is something not right - what a surprise!!

Nothing ever goes to plan with this company.

pinnacle - 07 Dec 2006 23:15 - 22882 of 27111

The price seems to have taken a significant hit finishing at 1.10 and yet I can not see a large sale to finish the day?

Also, it would seem therefore that depending on when this news broke it was a surprise and has not been taken well.

Something is not quite right - so how do we find out what is happening?

oblomov - 08 Dec 2006 07:20 - 22883 of 27111



Like this:-

zscrooge - 08 Dec 2006 09:06 - 22884 of 27111

Group of SEO investors around an SEO RNS.

jimward9 - 08 Dec 2006 10:34 - 22885 of 27111

found this posted on adv board by (MM111)

Stanelco News

All Stanelco RNS and Buisiness Wire announcements to the Market

Biotec target of 200,000 tons per annum

This is from the SPHere Spanish Website, translated (badly !) by Altavista, but it's good enough to understand that SPHere and Stanelco expect production at the end of 2006 to be 50,0000 tons per annum, and more importantly they may have plans to build a second 50,000 tons per annum factory in France next year, and they say it's then realistic to raise production to 200,000 tons per annum within two years


With BIOTEC, SPHERE makes sure the supplyings biopoleros, as well as the capacity to develop ambitious research programs. BIOTEC, that is controlled in another 50% by British company STANELCO, invoiced in 2005 about 2.5 million of? and tms./a projects to increase its capacity of production of present 15,000 bioplticos of, to 50,000 tms./a at the end of 2006. The company does not discard to construct one second plant of 50,000 tms./a in France in 2007 and considers realist to reach a productive potential of next 200,000 bioplticos of tms./a in the two years, given the necessities of this new market. In addition to the biodegradable bags, the new production of menaje and added domestic packing to the hers traditional one of bags, will allow SPHERE SPAIN to break the stagnation of the sales of the last years. After the insolvent attempt to buy COTALSA, which it produces a similar article range to which SPHERE SPAIN will commercialize from this spring, the group chose to entrust to the Spanish branch his own production. This new activity could elevate between 3 and 4 million of? the annual invoicing of SPHERE SPAIN, that until now was of almost 30 million of? annual.

robinhood - 08 Dec 2006 10:44 - 22886 of 27111

Jimward- i assume the ? =Euros as on some keyboards that sign is not available

jimward9 - 08 Dec 2006 10:56 - 22887 of 27111

I assumed that to robinhood.
But I thought on a earlier post (weeks ago) that Biotec were at 200000 tons!

greekman - 08 Dec 2006 11:44 - 22888 of 27111

Just a reasonable slice of that $42 Billion would be good. (see below).
The report looks at getting the balance between the true cost of environmental packaging with it's true cost.

Sustainable Food and Beverage Packaging Market to Surpass $42 Billion by 2010.
Dec. 08, 2006.

As the collective U.S. consciousness slowly accepts the idea of sustainable and eco-friendly products, manufacturers and retailers have responded, particularly in the food and beverage industry where shipments of sustainable or green packaging exceeded $37 billion in 2005, according to Sustainable (Green) Packaging Market for Food & Beverages, a new report from market research publisher Specialists in Business Information (SBI).

See link re full article.

http://www.prleap.com/pr/58062/


Register now or login to post to this thread.