for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm

23000 !

But who are the owners? Are the MMF's being built on the assumption that someone will want to buy them? If so, the 10 cents per 1lb royalty figure is purely speculative. The actualt figure would be whatever could be negotiated with any perspective buyers - assuming they find anyone who wants to buy them.

Tony's post no 23000 above prompted be to look back at the early posts. Here's post number 4 - Bosley said ' i think its worth hanging on at least for a little while longer' 'still the possibilty of a deal ' and 'new products and technology at stanelco means only good things. i would like to see more news flow'

lol - almost 3 years and whats changed!!!!



bosley - 20 Feb 2004 17:26 - 4 of 23001
its very tempting and i feel the same way about fortune oil. as far as stanelco is concerned i think its worth hanging on at least for a little while longer . the 90 day trial with reckitt beckinser is close to ending so something good could happen there . and there is still the possibilty of a deal with sainsburys in the background. the negative aspects i.e. legal problem with bioprogress is probably the reason why this share isnt flying as well as last years loss. as far as i can see, the new products and technology at stanelco means only good things. i would like to see more news flow and it pains me to see the spectacular gains bioprogress are making while stanelco move sideways and slightly upwards. but .......any gain is beter than a loss........

was it that long ago? blimey, doesn't time fly ......

How exceedingly perspicacious of you, bosley................

Blimmy us three still here.

not when i'm using right guard, alan ;)

The last dregs of a discredited regime..........the rump of a gentlemans optimism society........

Gentlemans Optimism Society still waiting.

STANELCO investors website...v.good kevin hector
http:// STANELCO investors website...v.good kevin hector
http://http://www.stanelco.devisland.net

Does SEO have a department of misinformation ?

Stanelco PLC Shareholders Discussion Forum


To register and use this discussion forum you must first agree to the following :-

You are a shareholder of Stanelco PLC.

You will not discuss any companies other than Stanelco PLC, it's subsidiaries, partners, clients and prospective entities thereof.

You will not post 'share tips' or any other 'investment' suggestions.

You will not post anything considered to be 'spam' or links to websites for your personal gain.

You will not post anything deemed to be 'ramping' or 'bashing' of Stanelco PLC.

You will not post 'rumours' related to Stanelco PLC, other than those published in the press or by analysts.

You will not submit any personal abuse to this site, directed at anyone known on or off the forum, either posted or by Private Messenger.

You will not post anything that infringes Copyright.

Paul, you forgot to add no freedom of speech. What a control freak.

Mention of SEO here - not very exciting:-

http://www.telegraph.co.uk:80/money/main.jhtml?xml=/money/2006/12/16/cmclub16.xml

oblomov,

Am not very impressed at the way they run their portfoilo,a 12,000 portfolio with 10,000 invested in a diamond mining company and holding SEO at 16p and not cutting their losses you have thought they would known better after Marconi.

aldwickk

You appear to have some personal baggage about Paul Masterson/PM1/Sirjc or anyone who seems to fit your view of their profile.

If you have some problem with an individual, that is between you and him and the BBs you BOTH post on. This is of no concern or interest to anyone here. So far no-one has risen to your bait or attempts to try to gain support in your attitude towards someone who does not post here in any of your perceived guises of him.

This has been generally a well controlled and constructive BB for discussing a share - not waging personal vendettas to discredit individuals, or even any compny, with continual negative comments irrelevent to the advancement of reasoned discussion.

Please keep it that way otherwise it will degenerate into a personal personality slanging match that turned so many away from another BB and which does no-one any good.

Well said Tony I did point this out to him on 11/12 but not in such an eloquent turn of phrase!(especially for 0030 hrs)

Read on another BB that Sylvia has been 'sacked'.

She did s fine job ignoring our emails and thats the thanks she gets.

Tony,

" So far no-one has risen to your bait " you just have , relax Tony. LOL

Aldwickk... squelched.

I spoke to Head Office during this last week about other matters and pointedly asked the question as to what had happened to Sylvia Leavey and was told that she had neither left or had been made redundant.

Oh, and btw, I shall be continuing my research project a little more tomorrow and hope to get emphatic confirmation either about Sylvia Leavey which I shall pass on to the board.

The oily one