bosley
- 20 Feb 2004 09:34
stockdog
- 18 Dec 2006 10:12
- 23032 of 27111
Fair comment Tony. I' still in watching and waiting.
Sharesure
- 18 Dec 2006 11:31
- 23033 of 27111
Tony, Are you related to MW?
oblomov
- 18 Dec 2006 12:22
- 23034 of 27111
Tony,
In the first year of MW's 'reign' we saw a failure to deliver on Greenseal, then a failure to deliver the Starpol (MMF's) 'imminent' deals and then a situation where SEO were 3 weeks away from going bust.
Since the EGM we've heard absoulutely nothing, and yet you say stockdog
"what we need -a strategic leader and motivator that the city and large customers believe in,'...'MW seems to be shaping up into this and has shown most of this already'
You then say 'Looking back I am impressed in what he has achieved in dealing with the set-up and situation he went into' So am I, considering he went into a Stanelco who were supposedly in the progress of converting 200-300 GS machines!
ARE you related to MW?
dawall
- 18 Dec 2006 12:54
- 23035 of 27111
Seems to be some differences of opinion on Wagner at present but what I would love to know is what is it that persuaded Schroders and others to invest 10m+ in a comapny with shite management but excellent products (or so we are told). What information could they have been subjected to that us other shareholders were not at the time of funding?
Also as regards the funding why should Schroders and others be party to more information than all other shareholders? Is this surely not against stock exchange rules and if so why wasn't more information made pubicly available?
Does anyone believe Shroders would have invested so heavily if there were only 2 MMFs on the table?
How much control do you think Schroders now have on day to day Operations and commercialisation?
Any thoughts anybody?
PATISEAR
- 18 Dec 2006 12:59
- 23036 of 27111
Surely with 5.6mil buys against 18.2mil sells and the continuance of bid-offer to rise, the signal to sellers would be to 'hold'.!!!
Tony
ARE you related to MW?
Tonyrelaxes
- 18 Dec 2006 19:05
- 23037 of 27111
We all know about the expectations we had been led to expect by what you call a shite management based on hype and ramp.
MW came along, probably equally full of hopeful expectations. Look what he found. Look what he has done to attempt to turn it around. Any suggestions as to what more he and the Board (not the shite one, but an all new one he replaced it with) can do would no doubt be welcomed. Send them to SEO via Financial Dynamics - anything of merit will be considered I am sure.
I think it unfair to hold him responsible for the past attitudes which by now we all realise were not what we (yes, including myself) expected.
No. MW is no relative, nor even a friend, of mine. Never heard of the fellow until he joined SEO and only ever seen him at SEO meetings. Maybe others could have done as well or better - but, on balance, I am now mightily glad he came otherwise where would we be now?
Down the pan with no SP - apart from all the Clever Dicks who, knowing and seeing so much, got out at 30p. As you still post here, I assume, you do not fall into that category because if you do you are watching your investments elsewhere !
Oilywag
- 18 Dec 2006 20:33
- 23038 of 27111
Tonyrelaxes IS MW's sister-in-law!?!?
Lets hope that that settles that argument once and for all.
The oily one
stockdog
- 18 Dec 2006 23:03
- 23039 of 27111
Time to change your name to Tonyrelated??
oblomov
- 19 Dec 2006 07:29
- 23040 of 27111
hewittalan6
- 19 Dec 2006 07:32
- 23041 of 27111
SEO = bankruptcy squared???
;-)
aldwickk
- 19 Dec 2006 07:43
- 23042 of 27111
Its all relative.
oblomov
- 19 Dec 2006 07:58
- 23043 of 27111
hewittalan6
- 19 Dec 2006 07:59
- 23044 of 27111
LOL
hewittalan6
- 19 Dec 2006 08:03
- 23045 of 27111
I can now confirm that Stephen Hawkins follow up book to "A breif history of time" will not be "An explanation of Stanelco RNS".
He couldn't understand it all and got very confused by about August of this year, so he is now trying something easier along the lines of Life, The Universe and Everything.
stockdog
- 19 Dec 2006 10:05
- 23046 of 27111
Has super-string been approved by the FDA?
tweenie
- 19 Dec 2006 10:15
- 23047 of 27111
I'm pretty certain there was an RNS re fda approval of super-string.
I think they're waiting till the end of time to release it officially in case theres sudden influx of quarks and nutrinos into this market hopeing to make a quick entropy buck resulting in the destabilisation of the said market resulting in a collapse of the time space continuum and possibly life as we know it.........
Obviously I'm only guessing.
WTFDIK
DYOR
:-)
hewittalan6
- 19 Dec 2006 10:18
- 23048 of 27111
So you don't know for sure, Tweenie??
Does that prove the uncertainty principle??
hewittalan6
- 19 Dec 2006 10:23
- 23049 of 27111
Not wishing to labour a point, but Einsteinian mathematics gave rise to the multiverse theory. So according to Einstein, there is a universe somewhere, where FDA approval was granted, SEO got contracts with McDonalds, Asda, Walmart & Uncle Tom Cobleigh and the SP was now Gazillions of .
The company is very successful and profitable, but we invested in it in the wrong universe, so its all our fault.
Tonyrelaxes
- 19 Dec 2006 10:29
- 23050 of 27111
I recall the Infinite Probability Drive - not the Infinite Profitability Drive
oblomov
- 19 Dec 2006 10:31
- 23051 of 27111
Just my bloody luck to be born in the wrong universe. Theres probably also a universe where England have a good cricket team and Tony Blair is a good prime minister!