Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

THE TALK TO YOURSELF THREAD. (NOWT)     

goldfinger - 09 Jun 2005 12:25

Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).

Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.

cheers GF.

aldwickk - 09 Apr 2013 02:58 - 23055 of 81564

Goldfinger is sounding more more like Fred , and we all know what a joke he is.

He said we should email him to resolve any conflict , then he goes running to his pal's at moneyam when i started a Fred free talk to your self thread. and now he his reporting chuckles for abuse when clearly it wasn't anymore that is posted on this thread every day, why does he not report Tanker ?

goldfinger - 09 Apr 2013 03:16 - 23056 of 81564

aldwick........ read the thread header.

And yes I saw your earlier dig.

This past summer you were in effect stealing copyright/B Board generaly accepted proceedure. And what on earth makes you think Fred wouldnt have posted on your new thread?????.

I have not recieved an e-mail from you or anyone else for that matter.

Am I supposed to be telepathic!!!!!

And by the way tanker is not guilty of reposting squelched posts (as per chuckles) and nobody has reported any problems to me about him.

goldfinger - 09 Apr 2013 03:27 - 23057 of 81564

ALL THREAD USERS PLEASE READ AND ADHERE TO MONEY AMs STANDARDS.

This applys to everyone.

Content Standards

As part of our commitment to make our Bulletin Boards as informative, user friendly and free from abuse as possible for our users, please read the following Content Standards which apply to any and all material (�contributions�) which you make to the Website including the Bulletin Boards and which incorporate our General Terms and Conditions .

Your commitment to these Standards ensures a positive experience for all of our users.

The Standards

You must comply with the spirit of the following standards as well as the letter. The Standards apply to each part of any Contribution as well as to its whole.

Contributions must:


Be accurate where they state facts

Be genuinely held where they state opinions

Comply with applicable law in any country from which they are posted
Contributions must not:


Contain any material which is defamatory of any other person;

Contain any material which is obscene or offensive;

Infringe any copyright, database right or trade mark of any other person;

Be likely to deceive any person;

Be made in breach of any legal duty owed to a third party such as a contractual duty or a duty of confidence;

Be likely to harass, upset, embarrass or alarm any other person;

Be likely to disrupt our service in any way;

Give the impression that they emanate from us where this is not the case;

Advocate promote or assist any unlawful act such as (by way of example only) copyright infringement or computer misuse;

Advertise any product or service other than MoneyAM without our prior written consent;

Contain any personal information or details about a fellow poster. Any poster doing so will have the post removed and their access to the bulletin boards revoked;
We caution against giving out any personally identifiable information (such as private email address, telephone number or home address) online. This information can easily be used for illegal or harmful purposes.

Please also be mindful of your fellow subscribers and treat them with the respect and courtesy they deserve.

If we discover that you have been abusing the Bulletin Board we reserve the right to remove your access to our site.


Haystack - 09 Apr 2013 03:32 - 23058 of 81564

Stealing copyright!!!!!!

This gets more bizzare by the minute.

Posts on most forums become the copyrighted property of those forums according to the terms of usage.

There is little chance of a copyright case for the above as judges would tend to take the approach of "what harm was there".

goldfinger - 09 Apr 2013 03:46 - 23059 of 81564

We did have a penalty system very much the same as in football on this board in the early days. ie, 2 yellows and then a red and you were off. I think Ian handed them out.

In fact I received a yellow myself back in 2003.

I dont know that its ended??.

Since the market perked up at xmas we have had it appears more activity and on some threads more un-gentleman like behaviour.

Perhaphs thats what you would like to see the penalty system again?, why not approach management and ask for it?.

aldwickk - 09 Apr 2013 06:25 - 23060 of 81564

penalty system , copy right ? lol

I thought it was Simon Cawkwell [ E K ] who exposed Robert Maxwells accounting not you

greekman - 09 Apr 2013 07:20 - 23061 of 81564

I keep seeing posts about lying deceiving Tories, then some about lying deceiving Labour.
Funny how there are no posts re lying deceiving Lib Dems, obviously because they have not been in power in our life times, that is until now with the coalition.
These generalisation posts are rather pointless as if you can show me a politician who does not lie and deceive and I will show you a politician that has never and will never get into power.
The only difference is some lie and deceive more than others!

Politics lies and deceit go hand in hand!

Stan - 09 Apr 2013 07:48 - 23062 of 81564

"Politics lies and deceit go hand in hand!" in general yes.. but some more then others.

This bloke came across as an exception though http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Bell

cynic - 09 Apr 2013 08:08 - 23063 of 81564

neatly put greek, though arguably a little cynically phrased!
don't forget lloyd george!

TANKER - 09 Apr 2013 08:09 - 23064 of 81564

hitler
starlin
thatcher

skinny - 09 Apr 2013 08:14 - 23065 of 81564


flopsy
mopsy
cottontail

HARRYCAT - 09 Apr 2013 08:30 - 23066 of 81564

Barry
Robin
Maurice

TANKER - 09 Apr 2013 08:34 - 23067 of 81564

me me me

goldfinger - 09 Apr 2013 09:41 - 23068 of 81564

maggie.JPG

Fred1new - 09 Apr 2013 09:45 - 23069 of 81564

I see the ALD of Jefferies’s fame has risen again.

When I was a school boy and student I worked at a colliery during “holiday” periods and union “dues” were deducted from my weekly pay packet.

This was a voluntary deduction and I objected to my father (who was management) and told him I didn’t want to pay the dues or be a temporary member of the NUM.

His reply, was it was up to me, but suggested that I looked around first and thought about what the unions had achieved and provided for me :

1) Improvement in Health and Safety standards
(Over 439 men had kill by fire and explosions at one pit at Senghenydd Colliery.
More than 500 men and boys died in 1901 and 1913 at the Universal Colliery in Senghenydd.)

As a young “man” he had worked there after and at the time of those explosions,
He thought the Unions had be responsible to help raise those standards.

2) Raising the standards of training of “boys” and those working at pits.

3) Provisions of welfare at Pits.

Medical examinations, recognition of Chest diseases, treatment of those injured and “Rest or Recovery Homes”

Simple things like Pit head baths, decent protective work wear.

Also legal representation for pit workers in case of accidents and sacking on “false cause”.

Pointed out that I may have use of such, if I had an accident at the pit and broke my leg.

Financial support families of workers "kill" at work.

Representation of a working community.

They also providing funding for many to go to “night schools” and university and into politics.

They also enabled decent standards of pay in the mining industry.

I won’t carry on, but one can see the importance of the unions.

I did not ask for my subs. back.

-----------------

Many of the pits after the WW2 were worked out and uneconomical because geological reasons and also due to lack of mechanism and also Coal imports produced in countries with “better” geological conditions and newly mechanised pits.
Were the unions “barmy” in the 50s,60s,70s,? Yes.

But the step, which was needed, was the introduction of the “secret” ballot and the “right” not to be a member in a union to work in an “industry” and removal of the closed shop in some industries.

The whole scale castration was brought on of the unions was by the stupidity of some of the union leadership at that period and viciousness of government of that period.
Scargill, Ummh.

I thought before that the “strike” that it was wrong and thought it would fail. Also recall the apprehension of that period discussing how unstable and dangerous the prior period in the Heath government was.

Much of the above, could be written about other heavy industries where the working conditions were appalling. (I witnessed them.)

I was against the Faulkland war and saw it as immoral self glorifying political stunt by Thatcher.

Also, I was against the Iraq and Afghanistan wars and foresaw the results, both of which were supported by the tory political leadership wanting to get on the bandwagons.

Apologies, the above is scrappy, but giving details is long winded.




Fred1new - 09 Apr 2013 09:50 - 23070 of 81564

Chuckles.

"You made your fortune from Thatcher policies, PMSL :-)"

This would suggest your ethos and that of the Thatcher period was what you could grab for yourself and not what you could do for others.

That is what the Thatcher philosophy and period will be known for.

Fred1new - 09 Apr 2013 09:50 - 23071 of 81564

Chuckles.

"You made your fortune from Thatcher policies, PMSL :-)"

This would suggest your ethos and that of the Thatcher period was what you could grab for yourself and not what you could do for others.

That is what the Thatcher philosophy and period will be known for.

goldfinger - 09 Apr 2013 09:56 - 23072 of 81564

Good point that Fred about Unions. Some people forget about all the welfare benefits they provide.

Not only that but some of them also give help towards education and further training.

skinny - 09 Apr 2013 10:01 - 23073 of 81564

The unions in their inception were very much needed, due to unscrupulous practices, employment of children etc etc. But by the 1960's they had become self-serving,bloated and probably more unscrupulous and corrupt than those they were meant to "protect" against.

God knows where we would be now, without the curtailing action attempted in the 1970's and finally actioned in the 1980's.

skinny - 09 Apr 2013 10:08 - 23074 of 81564

North Korea warns foreigners to quit South

SEOUL | Tue Apr 9, 2013 10:01am BST

(Reuters) - North Korea intensified threats of an imminent conflict against the United States and the South on Tuesday, warning foreigners to evacuate South Korea to avoid being dragged into a "merciless, sacred, retaliatory war".

The North's latest antagonistic message belied an atmosphere free of anxiety in the South Korean capital, where the city centre was bustling with traffic and offices operated normally.

Register now or login to post to this thread.