stockdog
- 24 Feb 2005 15:12
Hi everyone. I started this thread as FDC - but the copmpany recently changed its name to First Africa Oil (FAO). For completeness (nay, posterity) I've copied the original thread here - only three posts, two by me. So, as you can see I haven't given up trying to let you know about this very interesting prospect in W. Africa on and off shore.
Recently there has been a good deal of very heavy buying and selling since the reverse takeover on 7th Feb by Canadian Minerals comapny Energem's oil interests of FAO, in particular the following RNS on 15th Feb:-
The Company was notified on 14 February 2005 by RAB Capital ("RAB") that, following an
acquisition of 144,930,638 ordinary shares of 0.1p each ("Ordinary Shares") on 8
February 2005, RAB currently holds a total of 144,930,638 Ordinary Shares
representing 9.76 per cent. of the Company's issued Ordinary Share capital.
Now RAB has significant positions in FOGL and FGML and I believe many other similar oils/minerals co's and is no fool when it comes to taking large chunks of highly speculative early ventures.
I've cut out a lot of this as now out of date, leaving just the first post and now, by special request from SWW, here is a weblink and a chart.
Good luck.
Stock Dog
http://www.firstafricaoil.com/index.asp
">
capetown
- 14 Sep 2006 12:15
- 234 of 375
NOW whats going on with ZERO spread for nearly 5mins?
cynic
- 14 Sep 2006 12:24
- 235 of 375
soul* ...... quite probably; thanks
capetown
- 14 Sep 2006 12:32
- 236 of 375
Well hats off to those who bought @1.60 this am and now selling @ near 2p
georgetrio
- 14 Sep 2006 12:35
- 237 of 375
fish can fly, will not stop buying
cynic
- 14 Sep 2006 12:36
- 238 of 375
and the Titanic is unsinkable too
seawallwalker
- 14 Sep 2006 12:37
- 239 of 375
capetown - good luck with this.
Overall, I can't see where it's going, the fundraising and dilution both of which must happen for production to occur is a worry.
I won't be buying soul, it's a shame the way things are set up, because it could be a winner without so much fund raising to get going.
Still could be if they have a drilling surprise.
Without that it will be a bit of a slog for a while.
2517GEORGE
- 14 Sep 2006 12:38
- 240 of 375
georgetrio-------welcome back.
2517
georgetrio
- 14 Sep 2006 12:46
- 241 of 375
2517george
thank you, how much oil did Max petroleum come up with today cynic? a mere 180bopd. FAO will be producing a minimum of 7000bopd fact. I repeat FAO will not only rise but jump and fly like free bird. watch this space.
smiler o
- 14 Sep 2006 12:50
- 242 of 375
HI georgetrio
I to got some more today : )
seawallwalker
- 14 Sep 2006 12:51
- 243 of 375
7000bopd but with these cost implications.
3.6 East Orovinyare Exploitation Permit
PSC Summary
PSC effective date: -16 Feb. 2004
Duration: -10 yrs + 5yrs + 5yrsRoyalty:-5% of production up to 10,000 b/d -8% of production between 10,000-20,000 b/d
Production Sharing: -State share = 32% of profit oil up to 10,000 b/d-State share = 40% of profit oil10,000-30,000 b/d
Cost Recovery:-Up to 75% of net production
State Participation:-7.5% upon production
Work it out yourself.
maddoctor
- 14 Sep 2006 12:55
- 244 of 375
looks like the government will make money! :-)))
georgetrio
- 14 Sep 2006 12:57
- 245 of 375
Sealwall
Tell me how many companies are producing 7000bopd.
the fact is when a company is oversold and undervalued one must buy aggressively. Now there is a risk, but it does not need to be risky. when people pays 10p or 20p or 30p or 40p for a company that does not produce even a drop of oil, i think that's crazy.
georgetrio
- 14 Sep 2006 13:01
- 246 of 375
YES, the goverment need to make money otherwise one day when the regime changes they will cast the company out. Check venezuela, check chad. The best thing to do is to have a fair deal if there is enough oil in place. The governments are not stupid. the old days when companies come and make big profit and run off with everyting are over.
2517GEORGE
- 14 Sep 2006 13:02
- 247 of 375
georgetrio, we are 12 months away from production and finance has to be raised in order to reach that production.
2517
georgetrio
- 14 Sep 2006 13:04
- 248 of 375
SMILER
hi, nice one, the risk is big and must be handled but common sense is FAO well undervalued.
georgetrio
- 14 Sep 2006 13:11
- 249 of 375
2517george
yes, i hate the fact that the date of production has changed, q1 should be perfect but i think the new team is trying to avoid the mistake of the past when they said one thing and did it differently. i suspect they will start production before that. More fund are needed and they have been honest about it, not easy for longterm investors though. There is still the onshore asset and eov4 and some more upgrade to increase production. The key will be excellent management. best luck
cynic
- 14 Sep 2006 13:17
- 250 of 375
if anyone is toying with the idea of investing here, at best i would suggest you wait until there is a sustained change in the direction of the momentum
cynic
- 14 Sep 2006 13:26
- 252 of 375
soul* .... lest you have not seen it, you have e-mail