Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

THE TALK TO YOURSELF THREAD. (NOWT)     

goldfinger - 09 Jun 2005 12:25

Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).

Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.

cheers GF.

HARRYCAT - 12 Apr 2013 15:51 - 23662 of 81564

Just from memory. I remember you and Clubman had a spell of exchanging lewd pics for a while! ;o)

goldfinger - 12 Apr 2013 15:54 - 23663 of 81564

66 my foot, no way are you a pensioner unless youve found a wonder drug.........


IMG00038.jpg

skinny - 12 Apr 2013 15:54 - 23664 of 81564

Welcome to all Beta Testers

:-)

goldfinger - 12 Apr 2013 15:56 - 23665 of 81564

Whats that on the floor behind your left leg ????, your wallet...... no doubt empty.

cynic - 12 Apr 2013 16:02 - 23666 of 81564

if it's not a turd it must be a small toolkit or something ..... end August 2009 at the start of our Beaujolais jolly

cynic - 12 Apr 2013 16:09 - 23667 of 81564

goldfinger - 12 Apr 2013 16:10 - 23668 of 81564

Torries re-invention.........was only a matter of time.........

http://touchstoneblog.org.uk/2013/04/reinventing-the-poor-law/

Haystack - 12 Apr 2013 16:21 - 23669 of 81564

cynic
It that your usual 'tourist abroad' outfit? Where are the braces and knotted handkerchief?

cynic - 12 Apr 2013 16:23 - 23670 of 81564

From £17,000 to £3 million: The home that turned into a family fortune
A Chelsea home is now worth nearly 200 times as much as when it was bought in 1967

doesn't surprise me .... in 1972 i looked at a house (freehold) in a cul-de-sac off King's Road .... it would have cost me £24,000 ..... as it was the first property i had ever viewed, i took that as the norm

Shortie - 12 Apr 2013 16:40 - 23671 of 81564

I thought it was Mike Reid's little brother....

goldfinger - 12 Apr 2013 16:42 - 23672 of 81564

he he yep, nice one shortie. Wheres Babs.

Shortie - 12 Apr 2013 16:44 - 23673 of 81564

Post 23665 - Looks to me like your missing your horse... That outfit never came from a cycle shop did it??

Haystack - 12 Apr 2013 16:47 - 23674 of 81564

I thought the caption for the pic should have been, "fancy a nice time, dear?"

cynic - 12 Apr 2013 16:48 - 23675 of 81564

we take everything with us, so just a pair of lightweight chinos ..... you'ld be amazed how, with some experience, you need very little kit indeed, even for 5 days cycling

Haystack - 12 Apr 2013 16:49 - 23676 of 81564

The 'not full version of ding dong' is going to be 5 seconds.

goldfinger - 12 Apr 2013 16:52 - 23677 of 81564

5 seconds hardly worth playing. Even some Tory MPs are saying it should be full length version.

Probably become a gay icon.

goldfinger - 12 Apr 2013 16:54 - 23678 of 81564

Right thats it for me, off for a pedicure and then evening meal. Laters.

cynic - 12 Apr 2013 16:59 - 23679 of 81564

hope you have FSBC waxing!

Fred1new - 12 Apr 2013 17:09 - 23680 of 81564

Cynic,


Having seen you image you will be glad to know I still don't fancy you.

Don't worry, Hays might.

--------------------------

You can work out why I don't vote. Basically due to the incompetence of the type of government we have, self centred policies and no long term planning. Motivation short termed greed.

Cynics,

“The Fauklands’s Diaries” Do you read everything you read. You are a man who seems to have strange beliefs.

Hays,

The problems of the many in the unions, during the 50 to 80s, was that they often appeared to believe in political “revolution” and often had vocal, but poor leadership, who rather than concentrating on the needs of the groups they represented, became politically motivated and acted naively.

It was necessary to confront some of their extreme practices. Retrospectively, it is a pity that Barbara Castle’s “In Place of Strife” hadn’t been found more acceptable. (I can’t remember the details of what was offered in the contract.)

Unfortunately, rather than being pragmatic, the present tory elitist government, made up of over grown school boys, PR advertisement boards and conmen, prefer to behave as a “we are up to it” brigade. It is a reactionary, similar to the Thatcher government and offering political solutions more suitable to the tory out of touch governments of the 1922-1939 and the dismal performance of Ramsay Macdonald government.

It is time all sides the unions, and political parties grew up.

Other than the Atlee government and an attempt by Wilson, there has be little long term planning for the country’s economy and wellbeing as a whole.

The Atlee government, swimming in a pool of debt, did attempt to resolve some of to the post war problems, but subsequent governments ducked the realignment of economy and necessary upgrading and mechanism or modernising of the industry. Private industry and nationalised industry often “ducked” the investment problems, although there were attempts to improve of outdate plant. (The UK was competing against newly invested industry and improved working relationships, while some in the UK unions were in a deluded in what the thought to be the possibilities of post war communism.)

There was a background of misdirected, sometimes Luddite unions and often atrocious management. Private management was still being based on the inherited hand down of position.

But, many of the governments (and similarly the present one) were more involved in preserving their own privileges and/or the positions of their own supporters and maintaining themselves in power.

The mines were largely worked out, the “heavy” industries were uneconomical due to “old plant” and “restrictive practices”, the various governments were incompetent and dividing and alienating different groups and polarising opinions.

The various tory governments, other than in the “liberal” McMillan period, seemed, to many, to be supporting and advantaging themselves at the expense of society as a whole, while stoking up future problems of various forms of inequality.

As far as Union membership is concerned, as pointed out, the UK “heavy” industrial base has been killed off by Thatcher. The heavy industries provided the bases for the large unions, and one could expect them to diminish in size. Also, and probably more important, the Health and Safety bodies, and the Courts and Legal actions for unfair dismissal and compensation etc. has lessen the needs for the unions.

-----------
But, I wouldn’t be surprised to see some resurrection of the unions over the next 2-3years.

dreamcatcher - 12 Apr 2013 17:14 - 23681 of 81564

Register now or login to post to this thread.