paulbrooks71
- 19 Jan 2005 12:17
Have a look at todays news threads for EVS, great first half results, important acquisition announced, more exciting news promised in February. Up 25% so far today.
capetown
- 06 May 2005 12:01
- 237 of 305
Well i for one have stayed with it and have topped up,at 4.25/5.15/6.10/PLUS a major buy at 2.75,so let us all enjoy 10pence by the end of the year!!
Haystack
- 06 May 2005 12:10
- 238 of 305
Tenereds
At least post something close to the truth. I have not been banned temporarily or otherwise ever by ADVFN. You shouldn't believe what other posters say.
I see EVS is going down today despite some buys. Is this poor market sentiment towards EVS or is there a large sell not reported yet?
How much of a loss will the CCR part of EVS lose this year and how much will it impact adversely on EVS's bottom line.
Tenereds
- 06 May 2005 12:45
- 239 of 305
Hi,
What did I tell you, you cannot believe everything this person says as evidenced by following post on Ad..n His comments of"I have not been banned temporarily or otherwise EVER by Ad..n
10.17 -5623 of 5680
Re: Dwelshmafia/Haystack
We have barred both these users for a week, hopefully they will re-think
their strategies. If you need further abuse assistance in the future,
please could you specify the posts you are referring to and email this
to abuse@advfn.com.
Thank you for your assistance.
Regards
Helpdesk Support
(57 articles following)
Pos
It was only after a further email from the originator of the complaint that Haystack has been given another chance but with the proviso that he does not continue his de-ramping actions.
It is only a matter of time before he does.
Regards
Haystack
- 06 May 2005 12:49
- 240 of 305
I am afraid that the above post is a fake. You must try and not be so gullible. If you believe everything you see in posts on BBs then you may need a reality check.
ROFLMAO
superrod
- 06 May 2005 12:56
- 241 of 305
Tenereds
it would have been prudent to paste the WHOLE post ( which of course would give the identity of the poster ( i presume a peep from MAM ).
maybe it was omitted for nefarious reasons?.........i only ask as i am interested on accurate/free speech on bbs.
Tenereds
- 06 May 2005 13:15
- 242 of 305
Hi,
You can check on its originality by looking at the BB in question and the subsequent posts if you like.
I, too, am only interested in accurate/free speech and not comments from a well known de-ramper.
I accept that his company has cheaper call rates to some countries but CCR is only a small part of Envesta's business. Just look at the company's website Envestatelecom.com for a fuller picture.
Regards
Haystack
- 06 May 2005 13:21
- 243 of 305
Unfortunately it is not Tenereds post that is faked, but the poster on ADVFN who has faked an Email from ADVFN. I was not banned and never have been even temporarily. I imagine that the real Email told the poster not to be so silly.
Tenereds
- 06 May 2005 13:32
- 244 of 305
Are you saying that you did not therefore send this following post:-
Haystack - 6 May'05 - 11:20 - 5644 of 5680
*******
I can't say that I am the slightest bit interested in what you Email to ADVFN and I doubt that they are either. I suggest you crawl back under that stone you came from.
I will still be posting here negatively on EVS for a LONG time.
JUDGING BY YOUR COMMENTS THIS MORNING I THINK THAT I WILL LET PEOPLE DECIDE ON WHAT YOUR INTENTIONS ARE REGARDS THIS COMPANY.
Haystack
- 06 May 2005 13:41
- 245 of 305
I did post that and the Email that the poster mentioned was a fake. Of course I will be posting about EVS - why not? I have a very negative view in EVS and I choose to post it.
One could ask what are the intentions of someone who posts positively about a stock.
I don't mind you posting positive comment on EVS. I suggest you get used to me posting negative ones.
mickeyskint
- 06 May 2005 14:34
- 246 of 305
Ian Money AM
Are you monitoring this. Can you please keep it under control. I visit the other side regularly and it gets awful.
MS
Haystack
- 06 May 2005 14:39
- 247 of 305
Yes. Could you remove the post number 245 above please. It is becoming too personal for this BB. I think that most of us try and be polite even if we do not agree with the other posters.
Tenereds
- 06 May 2005 14:46
- 248 of 305
Hi Mickeyskint,
I am sorry that I have had to bring all this to everybody's attention as I really enjoy reading the posts on this site. It was comments made here that made me research the company in more detail and invest in this company in the first place.
Unfortunately, as we all know there are certain people in this world who like to disrupt reasoned discussions for their own benefit.
I had hoped that by posting Haystack's blatant de-ramping remarks and showing examples of his work on other BBs, people would dismiss his comments and he would tire of posting on this BB.
I hope that this is the case but I doubt it.
Haystack
- 06 May 2005 14:47
- 249 of 305
Ian Money Am
Can you remove post 245 above!
mickeyskint
- 06 May 2005 14:58
- 250 of 305
Tenereds
You have nothing to apologise for. Others here may not be aware of him, I most certainly was as although I don't post on the other side I certainly read.
Have a good one.
LOL
MS
mickeyskint
- 06 May 2005 14:58
- 251 of 305
IanT(MoneyAM)
- 09 May 2005 12:22
- 252 of 305
Tenereds,
I have removed your posting as it concentrated on personal abuse of an individual.
You are entitled to your opinion, but please stick to discussing the topic and not the individual.
Ian
hlyeo98
- 09 May 2005 16:39
- 253 of 305
Haystack is forever trying to de-ramp...i believe he is in the league of EK
andysmith
- 09 May 2005 22:00
- 254 of 305
Thats the cat amongst the pigeons Ian. So this notorious haystack person, is he not de-ramping then in an unnecessary manner or was it just that IYO tenereds went too far personally. Its p'd me off cos I'm looking at EVS and all this has been a distraction. We seem to be getting too many stray folk from other boards intent on bashing stocks on moneyam, we have the insiderinsider bloke on SEO talking absolute crap and now this haystack bloke. I have and do value the moneyam boards for honest opinions but I am hoping these bashers don't ruin it in the way that they apparently do on other boards.
ptholden
- 09 May 2005 22:52
- 255 of 305
AndyS
Must admit I was tempted to dip a toe in on Friday following the non-effect of the General Election. However, although the Support at 3.8p has now been tested on two occasions and the rising trend remains intact (albeit only just) the indicators just do not support further strength. In fact the opposite may be true. Always difficult to make a TA judgement with these small caps though. I wouldn't be surprised if it went either way to be honest, but at the moment I think I am leaning towards further weakness. Keeping on the Watchlist for now.
Regards
PTH
andysmith
- 10 May 2005 08:16
- 256 of 305
Thanks Pete, much the same here, would rather pay 4.5-5.0p and be sure.