goldfinger
- 09 Jun 2005 12:25
Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).
Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.
cheers GF.
3 monkies
- 14 Apr 2013 11:15
- 23787 of 81564
Totally agree.
Fred1new
- 14 Apr 2013 12:38
- 23788 of 81564
Hays,
Like Cameron and his crew you are living in the past, rather than learning from.
Your blinkered visions, don't seem to coincide with reality, which is perhaps your problem.
The days of gun boats and "up and at them" politics are gradually diminishing.
But, even in those days it was "Tommy this and Tommy that" led by the stupid and the bills paid by the poorer of society, in "deaths" and "social" conditions.
I will be interested in the results of the local elections, which I think is the reason for Cameron's latest squalid attempt to gains support, by the parading the remnants of Maggie for her last public event.
The only problem for Cameron is that it is reminding the public of the extremes of the Nasty Party's viciousness and the failed policies.
Also, drawing attention to their present policy failures.
I await the next General Election and the back lash which may occur.
I can see the rush of the tory "elite" to the Cayman Isles to regroup around Aschcroft, the present puppet master of the your party.
Dil
- 14 Apr 2013 13:10
- 23789 of 81564
Party at the Cardiff City Stadium Tuesday evening , anyone else going ?
Gausie
- 14 Apr 2013 13:19
- 23790 of 81564
Full Communism Now
cynic
- 14 Apr 2013 13:27
- 23791 of 81564
fred - at times you're as blinkered an ass as your m8s MrT and sticky, or hays in the opposing camp .... and boring and repetitive as you are, i shall be equally boring and repetitive by stating that people like you who don't vote, deserve the gov't that you get .... to then complain incessantly about pretty much every single thing that that gov't does is surely verging on the hycrotical
at least hays votes!
================
hays - much more interestingly, back to golf rules ..... the argument runs that tiger (knowingly) signed for a wrong score, and thus disqualification is (or should be) manadatory
Haystack
- 14 Apr 2013 13:37
- 23792 of 81564
cynic
I am not condoning the Tiger decision. I was merely identifying the basis of the decision that they claim to have used. The rule does mean that any offence that would require disqualifying can be overruled by the committee.
From the official rules of golf
33-7. Disqualification Penalty; Committee Discretion
A penalty of disqualification may in exceptional individual cases be waived, modified or imposed if the Committee considers such action warranted.
cynic
- 14 Apr 2013 13:41
- 23793 of 81564
means and ends comes to mind! .... not one of the rules committee's most glorious moments
Fred1new
- 14 Apr 2013 13:41
- 23794 of 81564
Cynic.
If you don't like my postings, don't read them and then you won't feel any need to reply.
Have a better day!
Haystack
- 14 Apr 2013 13:44
- 23795 of 81564
HOW MANY OF YOU ARE COLOUR BLIND?
Take the Ishihara colour blind test
http://colorvisiontesting.com/ishihara.htm
I am colour blind and my son is as well.
Fred1new
- 14 Apr 2013 13:48
- 23796 of 81564
Dil.
The last party I attended in Cardiff, was when Wales trounced England.
Wales 30-3 England, 16 Mar 2013.
Looked so easy!
I think they are building a library to commemorate the victory.
Mind in England they are closing them.
8-)
Haystack
- 14 Apr 2013 13:53
- 23797 of 81564
Fred
I remember when we closed the mines in Wales
Looked so easy! (and it was)
And they ARE building a library to commemorate Thatcher
Fred1new
- 14 Apr 2013 13:54
- 23798 of 81564
I did say blinkered, but does the colour blue stand out to you?
Or has Cameron's attempt at going green caused a problem?
How much did he pay for the logo designed by a 6 year old.
Another sham which is backfiring!
Fred1new
- 14 Apr 2013 13:55
- 23799 of 81564
Hays,
Is that to replace the ones they are closing.
Haystack
- 14 Apr 2013 14:06
- 23800 of 81564
The councils are closing the libraries.
The actual figure is less than 60 libraries actually closed. That continues a trend already existing under Labour. Visits to libraries have been declining due to e-books, internet etc anyway.
Fred1new
- 14 Apr 2013 14:25
- 23801 of 81564
If the latter is so, the tories could have stopped them. With future cut backs in education "expenses", they will be needed more and more.
Which councils are closing the most libraries, Tory, Lib Dem, or Labour?
-----------
Haystack
- 14 Apr 2013 14:29
- 23802 of 81564
Probably Labour councils. Conservative ones are run better.
Haystack
- 14 Apr 2013 14:38
- 23803 of 81564
In 2012 there were 41 libraries closed by Labour councils, 14 closed by Conservative. There were 40 new libraries opened.
cynic
- 14 Apr 2013 14:55
- 23804 of 81564
let's get back to the Rules of Golf ..... far more interesting and worthy of note than fred's continuous droppings .....
Hays - Rule 33-1 states specifically that the Committee has no power to waive a Rule of Golf
Then move to Rule 6-6.d - the competitor is responsible for the correctness of the score recorded for each hole on his score card. If he returns a score for any hole lower than actually taken, he is disqualified
And so to Rule 20 ..... in this instance, it was known from precisely what spot Tiger had hit his shot, and he even admitted as much ..... he was therefore obligated to take his drop as near as possible to that spot, though not nearer the hole .....
therefore Rule 20-7.c applies .... if a competitor makes a stroke from a wrong place (patently Tiger did), he incurs a penalty of two strokes
Therefore Tiger recorded an incorrect score and should have been disqualified - not least, because he knew and admitted he had not dropped his ball as near as possible to the spot from where he took his previous shot
Haystack
- 14 Apr 2013 15:06
- 23805 of 81564
cynic
The committee was not waiving a rule. They were waiving the penalty, which they are allowed to do. There is no suggestion that they are allowing people to ignore a rule. They have just decided that in spite of the violation they are waiving the penalty. A subtle distinction, but it seems to be valid.
Haystack
- 14 Apr 2013 15:08
- 23806 of 81564
An example from the real world would be someone committing a crime and being found guilty, but allowed to go free. The law was not being waived, just the penalty.