Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.
  • Page:
  • 1
  • 2

Piers Morgan, where do you stand? (MIR)     

Jules - 10 May 2004 18:41

I felt a thread should be started on the role of Piers Morgan in the 'picture allegations' which are being bandied around the world.
Whether or not these pictures are real, I would like to see this man hauled across the coals!! I feel very strongly that the position he has taken has put the life of british soldiers and foreigners (especially those working in arab countries)in jeopardy.
As far as I am concerned, he is just a jumped up gossip columnist who is out to make as much money as possible with little regard to the actual consequences.
In my opinion, the british government were wrong to participate in this war, but it does not change the fact the Mr Morgan has been , and will be, a large contributer to further british, australian, new zealand, south african and other westerners deaths in arab countries, with his ill thought out publishing of these pictures.
I also feel that this will just fuel the terrorist cause.
If I had to describe Mr Morgan in 2 words, they would be 'dangerous' and 'greedy'..

EDIT....and now unemployed!!!!


Sequestor - 13 May 2004 08:24 - 24 of 40

T was talkong to a son of a relative who fought in Iraq, and he said that they were often hampered by , literally hundreds of media people , desperate for the sight of blood, how come these carnage prostitutes are allowed in a war zone?

deadfred - 13 May 2004 10:01 - 25 of 40

i hope someone gets legal advise
like this murder of the innocent american it has been associated with pic taken then blown out over the world of abuse in prisons in iraq
the press have to take some stick for this murder
abusing the prisoners was well out of order and thoses ppl will pay(belive me)

but what is the real abuse cutting someones head of or slicing it of bit by bit with a knife

did not see any brits or yanks doing this did we hmmmmmmmm

how can you be nice to an ememy who would rather cut your head of for humiliating him

sarcasim would stop dead in the west if we adopted there rules imho of course

i belive in freedom of speech(western culture not eastern or middle east)
but i also belive in the right of duty to ones country and putting the lives of our service ppl in more danger by publishing dubious pictures(imho) was very silly indeed(imho)
if as in the americans beheading the murder is put down to these pictures then as i said in the begining (imho) ppl should be made to pay and i hope ppl look at the legal system to make them pay for there fool hardiness of putting our boys in even more danger just to make money (imho)

mojo47 - 14 May 2004 07:22 - 26 of 40

I cant understand how or why the media wont be allowed to show photo's or give any news of Maxine Carr. (Against the national interest so we are told ) Not that I care if they put her on the next rocket to Mars And yet they were allowed by our government to print papers for days with them photo's of abuse that were totaly false, shouldnt someone be jailed for fraud or something. and when things go wrong in a company the first head to go should be the BOSS. Important earthshattering news like that should be checked out and double checked out and a lot of thought put into it befor it is printed . So Ops sorry we got it wrong isnt any excuse. It didnt work for Carr when she said I didnt know, Their is something I am am not getting here, or is our mr P Morgan going to get a way with the lot of it after taking all the extra money he made from the papers, well he will just take a good long holiday some place nice and warm, and come back refreshed

38 - 14 May 2004 08:41 - 27 of 40

Nice little piece on Radio 4 this morning suggesting that Morgan may be held responsible and that Fidelity, who like the old corporate governance thing, may just push for his resignation. (Have resisted the bad taste pun)

Jules - 14 May 2004 19:39 - 28 of 40

The jumped up little gossip queen resigned... fabulous. Can we now try him for manslaughter, and then all those other twats that started this war?????????

daves dazzlers - 14 May 2004 20:18 - 29 of 40

jules,how are you getting on with this thread??%wise
as for maxine carr,,,not as daft as she makes out,,,or is she?

Dil - 15 May 2004 00:32 - 30 of 40

Shoot him.

Regards

Sequestor - 15 May 2004 09:09 - 31 of 40

Nice sub- header in the Torygraph-"End of the Piers Show"

Fred1new - 15 May 2004 12:37 - 32 of 40

I dont suppose that the danger to American and British Troops in Iraq is in any way the result of the misdirected or indisciplined actions of the leaders and some of the soldiers on the ground.

Some of these actions were seen on ITV and BBC news programmes well in advance of PM. Similar brutalities were shown of the actions of Americans in Afghanistan and Guantanamo.

IMO These actions reflect the value systems of some of the American hierarchy being passed down to those on the ground, that is, a greater valuation of our boys compared with a son or daughter of an Arab. (The same type of disregard of other human beings took place in some of the actions by British Troops a few years ago in Northern Ireland.)

I can excuse violent, ugly inhumane actions in the fury of battle, although I wish it could be different, but not when these actions are carried out in a relatively safe situation with unarmed prisoners.

I certainly dont advocate the actions of the Iraqis slitting the throat of the American. I found it appalling. But likewise I found it appalling when we were bombarding the Iraq targets from 5miles up in the air with disregard for civilian population.

If Blair, Bush, and Rumsfeld etc. had visited not only the troops but also the hospitals and seen the children and other non-combatants, dismembered or mutilated I think they may be more circumspect about their actions.

I am not a pacifist, but I do think the Iraq Fiasco was unnecessary and the Sadam Problem could have been resolved in a different way. Again, I do expect that the decencies of a relatively civilised societies like Britain, France and in general, the West, should be observed by their troops if we are occupying another peoples country.


As far as the Mirror and PM is concerned I think it is wrong to have printed false evidence knowingly. Similarly for Blair and WMDs. Both should fall apologise and fall on their swords, hopefully blunt ones, in PMs case, to the readers and if the bases behind the allegations are not true, to the troops.

In Blairs case, the apologies should be to the British people, United Nations and Europe. Until the United Nations is involved in supervisory role, I can see the Iraq problem and World Instability increasing. This is reflected by the oil prices and world markets at the present time.




Sequestor - 15 May 2004 16:15 - 33 of 40

Yeah, we are always wrong, give them back Sadam and leave them to it

Fred1new - 15 May 2004 17:20 - 34 of 40

No not always, just sometimes

Haystack - 15 May 2004 17:53 - 35 of 40

I am pleased that we went to war with Iraq and I expect a good outcome in the long run. I also hope that Blair suffers because of it. Not because I don't agree with him, but because I have never like Blair.

I would like to see Gordon Brown take over as I think he is unlikey to get elected and therefore we will get rid of the Labour government.

Fred1new - 15 May 2004 20:18 - 36 of 40

I would suggest Bush for PM. which PM I don't mind!

Fred1new - 15 May 2004 20:19 - 37 of 40

Ps What would be a good outcome??????

Haystack - 15 May 2004 21:01 - 38 of 40

Iraq will be a guide for much of the middle east. For a number of reasons the West (US and UK) have chosen Iraq as a place to fight the forces of terrorism. The terrorists have done the same. The outcome there will dictate the future of terrorism on a global scale. The US knows this and that is why they will stay there.

bush - 16 May 2004 12:16 - 39 of 40

I have noted your comments (crunch) I understand your concerns (crunch) let's just go back to the reasons (crunch) the reasons we liberated EyeRaq (choke)
OIL
Pure and simple
In fact so pure
it's more like the Sunflower kind
In the end, after a few senseless deaths, we will manage to keep the world's economies growing until my close friends in the Automotive and Manufacturing Industries will be able to invest in and indeed profit from alternative fuels.
It was a stroke of luck (or perhaps God's will) that I could cloak my intentions with the terrible atrocities of 911, (such a cheap looking dashboard on germany's finest[but my friends will be pleased to hear, the all new version has used far superior materials and the exterior looks less like it's cheaper more economical stablemate]}

Mistakes have been made on all sides.
Let's get back to the issue of where we go from here.
In the near future I will be turning my attention to the WAR AGAINST NICOTINELLE
I am just waiting for an opportune time, perhaps the forthcoming film showing the effects of global warming may give terror groups some ideas, we can only sit back and hope.

God bless y'all

Flackwell Vialli - 16 May 2004 13:16 - 40 of 40

Hang him for treason - typical left of centre view.

Never let the facts get in the way of a good argument
  • Page:
  • 1
  • 2
Register now or login to post to this thread.