for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm

Oops, wrong thread :)

The Eleventh Commandment.
Do not give up on Stanelco. Trouble is nobody saw it because Moses forgot to turn the Tablet around.

Which is the harder,to feed the 5000 with 5 loaves and 2 fishes, or get a contract signed with Walmart.

OL1, I have a confession to make. I hold some SEO, when it was at .9 I thought I was buying enough shares to own the company. Thought of approaching with a takeover bid.

I am less than certain that it will be coming good for quite a while yet, but I think it is going to be slow.

I will be patient for the next 6mths to see what progress is made and the next results update.

Iankn73,

It was from the "darkside" .....I glance at it occasionally, but due to the volume of bickering its generally {80% say!} rubbish.

Greekman,

I've not kept up with that bb, so do not know the history or calibre of the person. His manner does remind me of PM1, but it was uncanny that he sort of got the following more or less right:

1: ~$14m loss.....most others were expecting ~6m
2: 2 deals done.....could be the 2 SEO products on WalMart's shelves
3: of the ~14m loss, he stated that 6m would be GS....was in a way

garyble

There is no way all those figures quoted by SirMark could have been guesses and he is certainly not a genius. He had inside information.

I leave people on here to consider the implications of that.

The oily one

Oily I agree with you ,interesting to see what happens on Wedensday.

Garyble,

You are right re the bickering. As for Sir Mark, like you I thought he was posting a bit like PM1. Sir Mark posted a couple of weeks ago that there would be 2 RNS releases that week, nudge nudge etc. That week there were none.
The problem is there are many gullible people about who believe him ( after following your posts for some time I know you are not one of them).
I believe he has been banned from the PM1 site so it can not be the same person, can it? Double bluff perhaps.

Oily,

Whilst not wishing to prolong the Sir Mark saga, believe me if you look through all his predictions, most have been wrong, with those being right just good guesswork. The figures he stated would be in the results were what could be picked up by those predicted by several other research areas. He was also telling punters NOT TO SELL, then stating he had just sold some shares. When bought to task re this he stated he was just profit taking or intended to buy back in at a lower sp.

Why are people shocked?
"
1: ~$14m loss.....most others were expecting ~6m
2: 2 deals done.....could be the 2 SEO products on WalMart's shelves
3: of the ~14m loss, he stated that 6m would be GS....was in a way
"
I bet you loads of people had that info prior to its annoucement. He just was silly enough to post it. Insider info is a part of life-surely-why the fuss?

Yes it can manipulate newbies on the board, but if anyone is making investment decisions purely on the basis of these forums you need your head reading.

I know there are people who post on here that have far more info which they are not willing to post. Sir Mark seems the exception.

Mad Pad-Are you picking up some AFC when it floats? I ask as you seem interested in the stock.

Just found it interesting guys. maybe something of nothing and simply an ego thing for the chap.

Some people could/would be taken in by certain posts/posters. Inside info is best kept to oneself IMO.

Back to the matter in hand: IF there is no significant movement in trade volume over the next week or two with no news, I'd say the storm would have been well and truly weatehered.

As someone stated recently, these results could have been worded to clear the decks of all the misinformation and mismanagement of the old regime, therefore establishing a stable platform from which to build.

There was certainly a fair degree of subtlety within the results, the casual comment of the 2 products {could be of little value in any event} with another to follow. 40% reduction in head count and costs. Also the "shortage" of PLA, albeit probably a very real issue in the short-term, I'm sure the likes of Natureworks have not stood still!

I'm hoping that I'll at least break even this year. It will need a 5 bagger from this point but should be achievable.

"maybe something of nothing and simply an ego thing for the chap. Inside info is best kept to oneself IMO." Spot on mate.

I'm not so hopeful as you Gary, but i'm expecting/hoping it will be trading around the 2 pence mark by the end of summer. With regards to the storm, I'm not so sure if its blown its last puff!!

In the many anxieties I have about this company is that if it does pick up a few deals and actually starts to earn a little cash, whether there will be management takeover, or another form of takeover at too low a price. Seen it before!!

Bugz,havn't decided yet but if HW "markets" it like he did SEO it may be worth a punt.

how about one of you rich guys buying another 1000000 shares no trades since 11-30

Bosley - I see we now have three grim reapers in the header. If they've come to harvest the corn to make some extra PLA, I'm afraid they are a few months too early.

sd, i know. the reapers had a bit of a grim time .

oily, is that better?

Bosley is that a preacherman's collar peeping out,he looks a bit smug,maybe he could say a prayer for SEO.Or is it you?,did you go grey after investing in SEO or before?

Bosley

Shouldn't that read 'shareholders' have had a bit of a grim time.

Much better!

Any reason why its Sir Fergie or just because you are a Man U fan?

The oily one

Wouldn't Sven be more appropriate? Takes 6000 a day from the FA for sweet FA.

Now there's a cynical man!

The oily one

PS Actually that applies to many of the England team players as well! They do sweet FA when wearing the three Lions on their chests. Prima Donnas don't have a patch on this useless lot.