goldfinger
- 09 Jun 2005 12:25
Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).
Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.
cheers GF.
cynic
- 24 Apr 2013 15:26
- 24217 of 81564
after cleaning out his mouth with same no doubt
goldfinger
- 24 Apr 2013 16:06
- 24218 of 81564
SWAZ theirs no doubt hes a brilliant player but would this happen under Sir Alex or even more the great BUSBY. Or Shankly for that matter.
OK Eric got out of hand. But was severely dealt with.
Perhaphs a dog muzzle is the permanent answer.
My god if my former school house master heard of such an incident hed have thrown me from one side of the class room to the other and put the boot in.
Its all about the boss.
doodlebug4
- 24 Apr 2013 16:06
- 24219 of 81564
He should have all his teeth removed without the use of anaesthetic.
Haystack
- 24 Apr 2013 16:23
- 24220 of 81564
'house master'? Would that be left wing public school?
goldfinger
- 24 Apr 2013 16:27
- 24221 of 81564
Shankly would have sold him straight away no messing.
Mind in them days I dont think their would be any buyers knowing what he did.
Great man was Shankly, my uncle used to play 5 a side with him on the rec on a sunday afternoon here in Huddersfield. Hard as iron he used to say about him.
Used to tell him his favourite player was Dennis Law. In fact tried to sign him but went to Italy.
Dennis wouldnt bite you, mind hed give you a quick kick in the shins when the ref wasnt looking.
niceonecyril
- 24 Apr 2013 16:30
- 24222 of 81564
goldfinger
- 24 Apr 2013 16:44
- 24223 of 81564
Hays...........richmond wesley malom and howarth.
Royds Hall Secondary.
Harold Wilson used to go their but was a grammer school in his days.
cynic
- 24 Apr 2013 16:49
- 24224 of 81564
and they would have taught him the difference between "their" and "there" and also how to spell "grammar" in those days too!
Haystack
- 24 Apr 2013 16:54
- 24225 of 81564
cynic
Are you still away?
Haystack
- 24 Apr 2013 17:16
- 24226 of 81564
Talking of Harold Wilson, he closed more pits than Thatcher.
cynic
- 24 Apr 2013 17:17
- 24227 of 81564
came back from jersey on saturday morning ...... sunny but very windy made for some great but testing conditions
goldfinger
- 24 Apr 2013 17:28
- 24228 of 81564
yes yes hays, but they were un- economic in other words on their last feet.
Thatcher closed down economic mines that could have shipped to Belgium and India.
goldfinger
- 24 Apr 2013 17:31
- 24229 of 81564
cynic yes such a good boy for spoting my useless use of the English language. 10 brownie points and a slap on the arse from your FAG.
I bet you miss him or was that him caddying for you last week?.
Haystack
- 24 Apr 2013 17:34
- 24230 of 81564
Ah yes! You were hitting and chasing that poor little white ball.
Is it a different time zone there?
It would probably be the only place I have never been to in Europe. I went to Gothenberg for a day once. Up in the middle of the night and back the same, just for a business meeting. It was middle of winter and bloody freezing.
I have been passed the Channel Islands a few times on a ferry to France.
goldfinger
- 24 Apr 2013 17:35
- 24231 of 81564
ps, bright boys (cynic and hays) who is the brainiest mp in parliament today........going on educational achievements.
clue........ link to Harold.
Haystack
- 24 Apr 2013 17:42
- 24232 of 81564
Thatcher closed uneconomic pits. The test was different under Thatcher as she stopped state subsidies. Wilson kept pits open that were really uneconomic by the trick of subsidies. Wilson wanted to close a lot more, but the unions wouldn't put up with it so he had to continue the state handouts. That stupid attitude took us into the 1970s when all the state run industries were losing money hand over fist. State subsidies were stopped and then industry had to pay its way. The next step was privatising and reprivatising of badly run state industries.
Haystack
- 24 Apr 2013 17:45
- 24233 of 81564
Rt Hon Dr Oliver LETWIN, MP Conservative Dorset West; son of Professor W Letwin, and Dr S R Letwin (d 1993); born 19 May 1956; Educ Eton, Trinity College, Cambridge (MA, PhD); married 1984, Isabel Grace, daughter of Professor John Frank Davidson, FRS; 1 son (Jeremy John Peter) 5 July 1993, 1 daughter (Laura Shirley – twin);
Career visiting research fellow Princeton University 1980-81; research fellow Darwin College, Cambridge 1981-82; special adviser Department of Education and Science 1982-83; member Prime Minister’s Policy Unit 1983-86; director N M Rothschild and Sons Ltd 1991- (joined 1986); MP (Conservative) Dorset W 1997-; opposition front bench spokesman on constitutional affairs 1998-99; Shadow Financial Secretary to the Treasury 1999-2000; Shadow Chief Secretary to the Treasury 2000-2001; Shadow Secretary of State for Home Affairs 2001-; FRSA 1991; made a Privy Councillor 2002; Publications Ethics, Emotion and the Unity of the Self (1984), Privatising the World (1987), Aims of Schooling (1988), Drift to Union (1990), The Purpose of Politics (1999); numerous articles in learned and popular journals; Recreations philosophy, walking, skiing, tennis; Clubs St Stephen’s Constitutional.
skinny
- 24 Apr 2013 17:50
- 24234 of 81564
.
Fred1new
- 24 Apr 2013 18:04
- 24235 of 81564
Explain the difference between state subsidies and "welfare benefits having to be paid" to inadequately paid workforces who working for some private companies, who often have grossly different pay levels for management and directors of same companies.
Ie. the tax-payers are subsidising "uneconomical" companies and the living standards of incompetent management, shares holders or owners of those "companies".
(Unfortunately, subsidies were a necessary evil for a period after WW2. (And also, for some areas or companies with high R&D.)
It should have bought a period for reorganisation of industry, allowing for gradual closing of the uneconomical "industries" and replacement with alternative forms of "industry" for those who would have lost jobs. (A planned economy.)
Also, during that period, private "companies" could have invested more in "capital and new plant" etc..
But like now, they didn't.
The major reason being that "private capital investors" didn't trust the government of that period and are demonstrating that they don't trust the present one.
With the level of incompetence being demonstrated by the coalition government, I don't blame them.
cynic
- 24 Apr 2013 18:05
- 24236 of 81564
piss off sticky :-)
1) my school didn't have fags
2) i don't have a caddy either nor even a trolley of any description - i may be old, but still carry a full set of clubs
3) "brainiest" is often misunderstood ..... many of the so-called brainiest shouldn't be allowed to cross the road on their own let alone run a business