Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

stanelco .......a new thread (SEO)     

bosley - 20 Feb 2004 09:34

Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&SiChart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&Si

for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm


Fred1new - 18 May 2007 16:16 - 24426 of 27111

Driver, I have heard rumours about you before. Are those really your children?

hewittalan6 - 18 May 2007 16:43 - 24427 of 27111

Has anyone heard anything about SPhere building two new factories, one in Spain and one in France?
Or am I being fed bullshit?

driver - 18 May 2007 16:51 - 24428 of 27111

Fred
Yes

driver - 18 May 2007 16:51 - 24429 of 27111

Al
Who knows.

tweenie - 18 May 2007 17:50 - 24430 of 27111

Ever the pessimist........
How long before a deal/roll out re greenseal.
This has got to be the quietest time of year , surely, for the packhouses.
I don't want to hear 'unfortunately, with the run up to xmas....." scenario/excuse again.



hello darkness my old friend.................
Oh and the answers to alans questions are
1. Yes , I think so.
2. everyones being fed on bullshit ....for we are mushrooms.

Fred1new - 21 May 2007 09:50 - 24431 of 27111

BPRG is in takeover mood. Any chance of them buying back SEO?

cynic - 21 May 2007 11:44 - 24432 of 27111

Last night's "crazy woman" on Wife Swap had it right ..... she actually goes totally OTT with removing all supermarket wrapping at the check-out, but as she did correctly observe, why do cucumbers (for instance) require any plastic wrapping at all when they are perfectly well protected by their own skin?

Fred1new - 21 May 2007 11:56 - 24433 of 27111

Food with clothes on lives longer!

annibendod - 21 May 2007 12:43 - 24434 of 27111

Hi cynic,

I saw that and I thought if you're so "green" why not buy your fruit & veg in the local market, as it won't be wrapped and also it's more likely to be sourced closer to home. As for the "sexual assault", it beggared belief that she went to the police, or did she forget it was filmed and there were witnesses to what happened (or didn't happen in this case).

cynic - 21 May 2007 13:46 - 24435 of 27111

anni .... i preached that message on this thread some time back! ..... personally i HATE being forced to buy veg in my local supermarket, though thankfully we still have a really good fishmonger/butcher ..... baker is about to close but that is through retirement .... even so, one just knows it will not be replaced with similar or even a deli

Fred1new - 21 May 2007 14:11 - 24436 of 27111

If you are buying fruit and vegetables at a local market and they look good, have a look around the back of the vendor's to see what labels are on the crates they arrived in.

hewittalan6 - 21 May 2007 14:40 - 24437 of 27111

Because cucumbers are not.............they get scraped and have insects lay eggs on their surface / burrow into them etc.
The rights and wrongs of supermarket packaging are a splendid irrelevancy. The vast majority of people want their food packaged, albeit less so. A world where all consumers did as that lady, would be a world where we all caught a bus or rode our bikes and that is not going to happen.
Idealism is something to be aimed for and never achieved, and thats a good thing.
After all, how happy would you be popping to your local shop with a covered jug to buy a pint of milk. And doing it on foot.

hewittalan6 - 21 May 2007 14:54 - 24438 of 27111

As an afterthought on cucumbers;
I have a feeling that if we measured carbon footprints on a cucumber grown on a local farm, shipped to a local greengrocers and sold to a local person then per cucumber, it would be larger than that of one grown in the med, flown to the UK, shipped by lorry to a supermarket and sold as part of the weekly shop.
Why?
The local farm would, by nature, be less efficient. The plane would be flying anyway, full of british tourists and stuffed donkeys and most of the consumers would be buying for a family on a weekly or fortnightly basis. The storage and transportation would be chilled, but the wastage rate would be very low.
The local farmer, with his inefficiencies, would have to accept either a higher wastage rate due to contamination or very expensive and environmentally unfriendly measures merely to keep his cucumbers in good condition, as well as still keeping them chilled. Also the consumer is likely to be driving to his local shops more frequently than a once a week family shop.Think economies of scale applied to carbon rather than cash. All for the sake of saving a plastic wrapper.
Now imagine the best of both worlds with a fully biodegradable plastic wrapper and that is the sales pitch for SEO, assuming they ever make a sale.
I may be very wrong, but just to look at the packaging ignores the wider implications of what is going on.

cynic - 21 May 2007 15:31 - 24439 of 27111

ALAN - you know what i think of this company and the pity i feel for those still holding on through thick and thin ..... nothing personal and i confess there are too many other important economic ramifications surrounding today's fave topic of the famous carbon footprint .... my opinion of unnecessary packaging is also already well voiced, whatever it may be made from.

as a silly aside, wouldn't a carbon foot squash the cucumber (lol)?
i suspect that most imported cucumbers, like the tomatoes and peppers, come from NL or sometimes Spain, so the distance (sorry; the carbon footprint!) is not that terrible

hewittalan6 - 21 May 2007 16:01 - 24440 of 27111

The point remains, cynic, that natures packaging is fine for something grown in your back garden and put straight in the fridge, but not usually mass storage and transportation.
The point about it being an irrelevancy is still relevant (sic) while people are paying no more than lip service to environmental issues.
I too, am fed up to the eye teeth with SEO but am strongly of the opinion that packaging is here to stay and the drive is for less and better, not none at all.
Indeed none at all is impossible. if you do anything other than dig a spud out of the ground and sell it loose, you must cover the damn thing in disclaimers, ingrediant lists and salt content!!! You cannot do that on a jacket. This is why getting rid of packaging, whatever you or I think, is seen as a backward step by the entire world, and why the drive is to make current systems sustainable, not idealistically green. So from a logical point of view, those ripping up packaging at the checkout and demanding everything unpackaged probably (though acting from the best of intentions) have it wrong.
This is not an isolated thing. The green lobby got their way in making car driving less attractive, by tolls and bus lanes and speed bumps et al. The intention was sound, reduce emmissions. the result was everyone sets off earlier for a journey, sits 15 minutes in jams with their engine running, accelerates madly when they can to make up time and belches even more fumes into the atmosphere. Reducing car parking spaces was the best yet. people drive around for hours looking for somewhere to stop the damn thing, throwing an extra few kilos of carbon into the air!! I cannot think of a more pointless use for a car, but we all do it.
alan

cynic - 21 May 2007 16:13 - 24441 of 27111

strange spuds you dig up if you they have a salt content ... lol!
"less" is de facto on the road to "none at all" even if that goal is unreachable, as indeed most goals should be.
and as i have posted before, (recycled) cardboard as used in wine cartons is eminently effective and re-recyclable and could surely easily replace much of the plastic trays etc currently being used.
as for home waste, we would happily recycle more if it was practical.
however, our wine and other bottles go in the dustbin (or should I use the car to take them elsewhere?) and much of the supermarket plastic or even paper waste is deemed unacceptable because it has either been used for milk or yoghurt or similar or the cardboard has some sort of plastic film to make it impermeable.

hewittalan6 - 21 May 2007 16:26 - 24442 of 27111

So now we see the market for SEO goods if they ever bother to sell them.
Frogmat for the cardboard and Starpol for the plastic bits!!
The brakes are, as always, the disposal end of the matter. It is fine if you are a gardener in a large country pile, to dig the packets into mother earth, but a bit of a problem for Nelson Mandela House, 14th floor who only have a vandalised window box.
Usually new creations are made from solving a problem. I fear this creation has created its own unique problems and that may be half the story, when the film is made.
I can see, in my minds eye, right now, a supermarket executive saying its a lovely product and it is around about cost neutral, but it has this disposal problem. Until refuse collection is aimed at this kind of thing, where will it biodegrade? Until then it is as green as any other product, but with the addition of lots of difficult questions being asked by anti bypass protesters living in trees. Come bcak when you have solved that end of the equation.
Perhaps the SEO lasting legacy to the world will be a replacement for the chicken and egg question.
Alan

cynic - 21 May 2007 16:42 - 24443 of 27111

of course, a major saving all round would be if the likes of my wife could be convinced that the dustbin does not need to eat more that the rest of us! ...... from time to time she gets given a "banned from buying" list!

hewittalan6 - 21 May 2007 16:47 - 24444 of 27111

I got one like that!!
Anyway. Time to move on. Recycling, composting or other environmentally friendly means of disposal are probably the future, rather than not using resources in the first place. The only real problem is that disposal is in the hands of our elected tits and that means it will probably be here by about 2037. Unless Gordon can fins a way to tax it, then it will be here by June.
Not a cynic. Just Jaded.
Alan

greekman - 21 May 2007 17:13 - 24445 of 27111

I am very keen on recycling as best I can, but I for one want my veg packaged albeit in a material that is as minimal as possible, and one that I can recycle.

Vegetables, Fruit and such like that are not packaged get handled by many other people prior to purchase. Whilst it obviously is going to be handled to a certain extent prior to packaging, at least I hope it will be in a fairly hygienic way.

None packed produce is open to being handled by nose picking, just been to the toilet none washing, generally dirty hands. Germs just don't stay on the surface, they can make their way into the veg, fruit itself, especially through porous skins.

Washing fruit with just plain water, wont kill germs.
How many of us eat apples, pears, tomatoes and such like without even washing them at all.

Also packaging retains freshness, so less waste.

I do buy some produce none packaged, but most of these are from a local farm shop (germs and all).
It's a bit of a catch 22.
Register now or login to post to this thread.