Found this on the Globalresearch web page and found it interesting.
Thought others might also find it so. It is a free published report available to all so have posted a fairly large section although not the full article as still cautious re any copyright infringment.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=BOW20051203&articleId=1396
On the Road to Damascus
by William Bowles
December 3, 2005
PSAs are effectively immune from public scrutiny and lock governments into economic terms that cannot be altered for decades. The potential losses to the Iraqi people are staggering, the most conservative estimates puts it at $94 billion over the usual (25 year length of a PSA contract) assuming oil at $40 per barrel and $250 billion if the cost is $50 per barrel!
PSAs first appeared in Indonesia in the late 1960s (not surprisingly following the US-inspired and backed overthrow of Sukarno). PSAs are an ingenious arrangement as PSAs shift the ownership of oil from companies to the state, and invert the flow of payments between state and company.
The report states the following facts about PSAs
A right to oil reserves. Companies want a deal that guarantees their right to extract the reserves for many years, thus ensuring their future growth and profits. Furthermore, they want a contract that allows them to book these reserves including them in their accounts which increases their company value. Production sharing agreements, like concession contracts, permit companies to book reserves in their accounts.
An opportunity to make large profits. Generally, oil companies make their profits from investing and risking their capital. In some cases, they lose their capital, for example when they drill a dry well. But in some cases they will find large and hugely profitable fields. Oil companies are therefore very different from service companies like Halliburton, which make money from fixed fees on predictable contracts. Oil companies aim for deals which may be more speculative, but which give them a chance of making super-profits. Production sharing agreements are designed to allow companies to achieve very large profits if successful.
Predictability of tax and regulation. While companies can accept exploration risk (that they wont find oil) or price risk (that the oil price falls), both being beyond their control, they try to manage political risk (that tax or regulatory demands will increase) by locking in governments. They thus seek to bind governments into long-term contracts that fix the terms of their investment. Production sharing agreements generally last for 25 to 40 years with terms protected from potential change by incoming governments.
END OF ARTICLE.
I was aware that PSA's are often for 20 years plus, but I was not aware that they tied in the contracting country so tightly with the company involved. I would like to see full details of the PET contract but probably not understand it.