for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm

We should find out tomorrow, cos 85m shares is about 2.7% of the company.
It must have taken someone over 3%, and possibly have dropped the odd insti by 1%+.
In either case, an RNS is required.
Unless it is a totally new investor, in which case they will surely not stop at 2.7%.

The suspense is really killing me, I can't wait.

Guys, let's be sensible here, have a look at the oil stocks, even if you are down to just a few hundred pounds it's best to put it into something worthwhile.

rf,
to have a few hundred pounds in SEO would rank you alongside people like morgan stanley, and I don't recall seeing them post on here.
Secondly, we don't invest for profit, just for a form of macabre self flagellation, so please allow us to whip ourselves into a hysterical frenzy, before the reality appears.
Foreplay was always the most fun.
;-)

You know, I think I'm going to give up, sigh....!

Spread has widened to .25/.29 flurry of small sells near close are we being frightened off?

halifax
i was a long time ago

200,000 worth of shares bought?

I've heard PM1 has sold his house.....

I heard PM1 had recently applied and been accepted for more than 50 new credit cards. If this goes tits up he'll be jumping off a large building. With a bit of luck obviously.

One thing that this thread does prove: that the quality of the stock is inversely proportional to the number of postings.

I hope whoever brought them does'nt end up a nominee for the DARWIN AWARDS.

Whoever bought into SEO today has to have a very good reason.

John Stanton resigned from the board of Z GROUP.See their share price dropped from 168p to 3p.No connection I hope.

MP the chairman of SEO is John Standen.

MP the chairman of SEO is John Standen.

I don't want to be a killjoy but it could be a broker to broker sale, I don't have 2nd level as yet, we shall see.

And it could be misreported, but what the hell. Its brightened up a dull day, and none of us longtermers will ever make any money on this anyway, so it gives us something to post about and take the pi$$ out of.
Surely we have earned that right?

Can anyone explain to me how a trade like this is worked? I would have thought there should have been corresponding sells. To acquire such an amount from the daily dribs and drabs would have taken weeks, so how did they come about?

Please excuse my ignorance, but still learning!

Broker to Broker would be reported as such.

It'a a function of the stock market that only one side of a trade is reported; so if this large trade was done in one go, you only see one side.

It's quite possible that a MM has been accumulating stock for a client over a period of time and having completed the transaction has now reported it.

Something else to remember is that SEO is a SETsMM stock, it is likey that most if not all the AT transactions at the Bid are buys not sells.