for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm

Spread has widened to .25/.29 flurry of small sells near close are we being frightened off?

halifax
i was a long time ago

200,000 worth of shares bought?

I've heard PM1 has sold his house.....

I heard PM1 had recently applied and been accepted for more than 50 new credit cards. If this goes tits up he'll be jumping off a large building. With a bit of luck obviously.

One thing that this thread does prove: that the quality of the stock is inversely proportional to the number of postings.

I hope whoever brought them does'nt end up a nominee for the DARWIN AWARDS.

Whoever bought into SEO today has to have a very good reason.

John Stanton resigned from the board of Z GROUP.See their share price dropped from 168p to 3p.No connection I hope.

MP the chairman of SEO is John Standen.

MP the chairman of SEO is John Standen.

I don't want to be a killjoy but it could be a broker to broker sale, I don't have 2nd level as yet, we shall see.

And it could be misreported, but what the hell. Its brightened up a dull day, and none of us longtermers will ever make any money on this anyway, so it gives us something to post about and take the pi$$ out of.
Surely we have earned that right?

Can anyone explain to me how a trade like this is worked? I would have thought there should have been corresponding sells. To acquire such an amount from the daily dribs and drabs would have taken weeks, so how did they come about?

Please excuse my ignorance, but still learning!

Broker to Broker would be reported as such.

It'a a function of the stock market that only one side of a trade is reported; so if this large trade was done in one go, you only see one side.

It's quite possible that a MM has been accumulating stock for a client over a period of time and having completed the transaction has now reported it.

Something else to remember is that SEO is a SETsMM stock, it is likey that most if not all the AT transactions at the Bid are buys not sells.

This stock is going under unless some sort of a miracle comes along, do people want to lose money , the answer is no, so what is the nonsense about persons or people whatever you want to describe them as : enjoying a situation where a company is in real trouble and enjoying it.

This stock is going under unless some sort of a miracle comes along, do people want to lose money , the answer is no, so what is the nonsense about persons or people whatever you want to describe them as : enjoying a situation where a company is in real trouble and enjoying it.

I'm glad this came out twice : it might knock some sense into people.

Sorry, Required field...........
far too busy shoving my dick in the electric socket to listen to sense.

Garyble,

As is often said for every buy of a share someone must have sold. But sells/buys do not always follow in so called real time.
Many shares are floating round in the system so to speak, with often there being big percentage of shares available to buy in the system. It's when the availability of shares for purchase comes tight that the mm's increase prices (usually unless they want to shake the tree). Often when there has been a hangover of shares that have been bought out of those floating about, it has noticeable effect on the sp. The chances of this with SEO are slim as most punters are waiting for some positive news as with all the previous hype nothing else will do.

Not the best explanation going but had a late night and off out soon.

Regards Greek.