bosley
- 20 Feb 2004 09:34
tweenie
- 24 Jan 2008 15:05
- 25608 of 27111
Not only are they incapable of generating 'new' business, they are unable to check on patents and ip they already own.
If this was a public company they would be sacked.....oh hang on.
aaaaaaaaagggggggggggghhhhhhhhhhhhh
Bunch of ************ cowboys.
roll on the AGM.
best they wear suits of armour.
Won't matter if they have an agenda or limited questions from the floor. i will get my pound of flesh this year.
Tonyrelaxes
- 24 Jan 2008 17:27
- 25609 of 27111
I'll be there too - and requiring many explanations to 'unresloved' situations.
Although it will be easy for them to blame the previous management, I still want to know the conclusions of the various trials, tests, agreements, partnerships etc.
tweenie, see you there, even if I have to fly back from Russia!!!!
greekman
- 24 Jan 2008 17:53
- 25610 of 27111
Tony,
Try to bring one of those Russian Migs back with you. And on that theme might just sell my remaining shares in SEO and purchase some flack jackets. Probably be
able to sell them for a good price to SEO's management team. Going by all the responses on here they will be needing them at the AGM.
Rotten tomatoes, eggs anyone.
stockdog
- 25 Jan 2008 09:22
- 25611 of 27111
hangon - 21 Jan 2008 12:01 - 25596 of 25610
"have I fallen asleep and they can make potato-bags out of starch from er, potatoes?"
My local supermarket seems to sell potatoes made out of compostable bags - so maybe there is a future for SEO after all.
tweenie
- 30 Jan 2008 09:39
- 25612 of 27111
I see Barclays have re-purchased the shares they sold.
No doubt the price will now be manipulated up a few ticks and then they will sell again and the cycle will continue.
On the one hand, i have to admire the fact that even in it's current state people are still making good money out of SEO, on the other hand i just want to kick the living crap out of seo's board for allowing/engineering? this debacle where all effort seems stagnated and manipulated towards a goal that the average investor is not privy too and no doubt will not benefit from.
PATISEAR
- 30 Jan 2008 19:23
- 25613 of 27111
I see Barclays have re-sold the shares they purchased
No doubt the price will now be manipulated down a few ticks and then they will buy again and the cycle will continue.
Iankn73
- 30 Jan 2008 23:25
- 25614 of 27111
guys,
Hows about making a pact? I know this might be very very difficult due to substantial losses incurred by fellow investors, but... why don't we refrain from posting anything about Stan Laurel & Co until there is something POSITIVE to post?? I know it may never happen but can we PLEASE.... resist.
Ian
kimoldfield
- 30 Jan 2008 23:42
- 25615 of 27111
Nah! It's an addiction Ian, we need our Stanelco fix!
Iankn73
- 30 Jan 2008 23:47
- 25616 of 27111
stop it kim, seek counseling!
kimoldfield
- 30 Jan 2008 23:58
- 25617 of 27111
:o)
oblomov
- 31 Jan 2008 09:19
- 25618 of 27111
'until there is something POSITIVE to post'
Each day they haven't gone bust is positive, Ian! You're obviously a 'glass half
empty' sort of guy!
oblomov
- 31 Jan 2008 11:58
- 25619 of 27111
4.35% rise in the sp today!
required field
- 31 Jan 2008 22:41
- 25620 of 27111
Stanelco, I'd almost forgotten, now what shall I dream up.....!
lostalot
- 04 Feb 2008 13:31
- 25621 of 27111
Does anyone know anything about the Rumours of new RF products ???
Or is this just Tosh ????
kimoldfield
- 04 Feb 2008 13:36
- 25622 of 27111
If it's anything to do with SEO it must surely be Tosh??? SEO = no Dosh, just Tosh! But you never know...................
kimoldfield
- 04 Feb 2008 15:29
- 25623 of 27111
Lostalot, I don't know what rumours you are referring to but there is a recent entry at the European Patent Office (31.1.2008):-
Abstract of WO2008012585
An apparatus for dielectric welding has an opposed pair of relatively movable electrodes (38, 44) ; items to be welded may be placed in and compressed between the electrodes, and radio frequency signals are supplied (16, 18) to the electrodes. At least one of the electrodes (14) incorporates an elastomeric member (52) forming or adjacent to its working surface. This elastomeric member is preferably of an electrically conducting material. The resilience of the elastomeric member (52) accommodates variations in the thickness of the material (36) that is to be welded.
This would appear, to me - but wtfdik - to be a variation on an already applied for patent. Not at all sure how these patent application thingies work though, so I cannot make any qualified statement.
greekman
- 04 Feb 2008 15:58
- 25624 of 27111
The problem is that even if it was a new RF products patented by SEO, if the past is anything to go by, by the time they got their fingers out no doubt a competitor would have stolen a lead on any available contracts.
If SEO found the secrete of Alchemy they would probable leave the formula on a park bench. Bloody hopeless.
http://www.alchemistbeats.com/alchemist.html
tweenie
- 04 Feb 2008 16:42
- 25625 of 27111
Stanelco would market the process whereby GOLD is turned into LEAD
:-)
and only patent the process one way.
Then spend 3 years researching what else they could turn GOLD into.
I give up.
Fred1new
- 04 Feb 2008 17:17
- 25626 of 27111
What is Barclays up to?
kimoldfield
- 05 Feb 2008 00:31
- 25627 of 27111
Doing the Hokey Kokey Fred, you know - in out, in out, shake it all about.........until it falls to pieces; then it can be RF sealed back together again.