goldfinger
- 09 Jun 2005 12:25
Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).
Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.
cheers GF.
cynic
- 03 Jun 2013 13:04
- 25618 of 81564
if there is no specific injunction, then assuredly it would be all over the internet and everywhere else
aldwickk
- 03 Jun 2013 13:05
- 25619 of 81564
they said it didn't involve any Ministers, didn't say if it was a gay affair [ or a unhappy one ] .. lol
cynic , you are talking about 10,Downing street ?
cynic
- 03 Jun 2013 13:08
- 25620 of 81564
i think it's the effect on DC rather than that it directly involves No 10
cynic
- 03 Jun 2013 13:15
- 25621 of 81564
on an even lighter note, it comes as no surprise at all that labour, under the guidance of Ed Balls, is now spouting pretty much the same fiscal doctrine as the tories - e.g. "iron discipline", tight fiscal controls, keeping a lid on welfare costs and capping benefits and so on and so forth
cynic scratches his bald pate and wonders if Ed Balls has recently been appointed as George Osborne's right hand man
hilary
- 03 Jun 2013 13:17
- 25622 of 81564
Is it Hugh Grant and Martine McCutcheon? Who's to say it's not love, actually?
cynic
- 03 Jun 2013 13:18
- 25623 of 81564
i wouldn't dream of posting my/our thoughts, but neither of the above
hilary
- 03 Jun 2013 13:19
- 25624 of 81564
Awwwww shucks, cyners. I was gonna scour the interweb for a sex tape.
Haystack
- 03 Jun 2013 13:30
- 25625 of 81564
Well, it is not as simple as that. If I told you why, then you would know who it was. Let's say that it is covered by a pre-existing injuction that goes back somewhat that is unrelated to this business.
Haystack
- 03 Jun 2013 13:32
- 25626 of 81564
It is not a gay affair and it does involve ex number 10.
hilary
- 03 Jun 2013 13:35
- 25627 of 81564
I think everyone probably either knows or has heard the rumour of who it is. But Haystack is quite right, if it is them, there is a very valid reason why the two people can't be named.
Haystack
- 03 Jun 2013 13:38
- 25628 of 81564
http://www.rttnews.com/2128972/uk-s-manufacturing-pmi-climbs-to-14-month-high-cips.aspx?type=eueco
UK's Manufacturing PMI Climbs To 14-Month High: CIPS
6/3/2013 4:46 AM ET
The purchasing managers' index for the British manufacturing sector increased sharply in May to the highest level in fourteen months as a robust domestic market led to faster growth of output and new orders, data released by Markit Economics and the Chartered Institute of Purchasing and Logistics (CIPS) showed Monday.
The seasonally adjusted Markit/CIPS manufacturing purchasing managers' index (PMI) climbed to a fourteen-month high of 51.3 in May from April's revised reading of 50.2. The index was forecast to rise to 50.1 from 49.8 originally reported in the previous month. Readings above 50 indicate growth, and those below point to contraction. The index increased for the second straight month.
The domestic market was the main driver of new order inflows, although new export business also contributed with a modest increase, the survey showed.
Manufacturing output increased across all the sub-sectors during the month, with growth registered by the consumer, intermediate and investment goods sectors. New orders received by British goods producers rose for the third consecutive month in May, led by a solid improvement in domestic market conditions.
Firms raised their staffing levels for the first time in four months, in line with the upturn in production. Input prices paid by manufacturers declined for the second month in a row, while output prices increased further as companies tried to protect margins and in response to higher demand.
aldwickk
- 03 Jun 2013 14:09
- 25629 of 81564
Must be a love child involved
doodlebug4
- 03 Jun 2013 14:51
- 25630 of 81564
It's Cherie Blair and Gordon Brown?
hilary
- 03 Jun 2013 14:53
- 25631 of 81564
On second thoughts, maybe I won't be scouring the internet for the sex tape then...
Haystack
- 03 Jun 2013 14:54
- 25632 of 81564
Unfortunately it is not Boris Johnson and Ann Widdecombe. That would be an interesting looking love child.
Plateman
- 03 Jun 2013 16:27
- 25633 of 81564
.
Fred1new
- 03 Jun 2013 20:50
- 25634 of 81564
Good bank lending confidence in the Uk's prospects.
I knew that Cameron was a genius in that he can always produced another diversion.
----------------------
I wonder if the "affair" involves Theresa?
cynic
- 03 Jun 2013 21:03
- 25635 of 81564
assuming no blatant disinformation, then it can't be Theresa directly as she is current cabinet
goldfinger
- 03 Jun 2013 21:36
- 25636 of 81564
Rumours on twitter one side is IDS.
No names posted for other side.
Cant see why its such a big deal.
Goes on all the time in big companys
and especially the Civil Service.
Fred1new
- 03 Jun 2013 21:37
- 25637 of 81564
Just wondering!