Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

THE TALK TO YOURSELF THREAD. (NOWT)     

goldfinger - 09 Jun 2005 12:25

Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).

Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.

cheers GF.

ahoj - 11 Jun 2013 08:55 - 25949 of 81564

I think by the time of election the order changes to LAB, UKIP, CON, LDEM

Cameron should stimulate the economy by spending on infrastructure.

Haystack - 11 Jun 2013 09:06 - 25950 of 81564

The order changes to CON,LAB,LDEM,...............UKIP

goldfinger - 11 Jun 2013 09:08 - 25951 of 81564

Hes more interested in history and wants to set some personal landmarks for himself (before being kicked out) like being the PM who legalised gay marriage and the PM who defied all and spent money on Foreign Aid whilst at the same time robbing the poor and disabled off his own country.

Haystack - 11 Jun 2013 09:11 - 25952 of 81564

One of the things that stops us charging the likes of Google, Amazon, Starbucks corporation tax on specific UK earning is membership of the EU. Outside the EU we can charge more corporation tax. The US for instance charges people on their worldwide earnings if they are US citizens no matter where they live.

cynic - 11 Jun 2013 09:11 - 25953 of 81564

sticky - stick with something useful like your charts instead of making silly rubbish comment :-)

==============

hays - i'm sure your talking rubbish about eu tax law ...... even within eu, each country sets its own personal and corporate taxes ..... thus if there really is good reason why uk should change its tax laws to clamp down on "corporate escape" - i.e. taking good note of what really will be any knock-on effects by so doing - then it can

Haystack - 11 Jun 2013 10:46 - 25954 of 81564

The knock on effects are not that serious in terms of the companies I mentioned as they would still be doing business here. Starbucks etc are not going to shut down business. They would just have to stump up.

Fred1new - 11 Jun 2013 10:55 - 25955 of 81564

Manuel,

"sorry, but you cannot mix legality and morality"

You do spout some rubbish.

It may have been "legally right" to put Jews in Concentration camps or Russian dissidents in gulags.

Laws have a moral basis. What that morality is, is often questionable, as is acquiescence to them.

Hiding behind an immoral law does not excuse the action if it is itself immoral.

But, one is legally entitled to have ones own personal morality.

Haystack - 11 Jun 2013 10:58 - 25956 of 81564

I have been checking on the EU aspects. Any tax laws including corporation tax must be compatible with EU laws and directives and cannot treat individuals or companies in a discriminatory way.

cynic - 11 Jun 2013 11:31 - 25957 of 81564

one is legally entitled to have ones own personal morality.
quite so, and you can choose to squander by giving extra money to the exchequer if you so choose (damn stupid) or, if legally avoiding tax sticks in your moral craw, then why not give the "extra" to a genuine charity of your choice (the moral alternative)?

TANKER - 11 Jun 2013 12:35 - 25958 of 81564

GF just for you have just had a phone call from the nhs and they are sending out some person to try out a new treatment for circulation problems but my wife must be their . 5pm tomorrow . its in its early days and I have agreed to try it out .

hilary - 11 Jun 2013 12:37 - 25959 of 81564

A frontal lobotomy?

Fred1new - 11 Jun 2013 12:41 - 25960 of 81564

Manuel,

"one is legally entitled to have one’s own personal morality.

quite so, and you can choose to squander by giving extra money to the exchequer if you so choose (damn stupid) or, if legally avoiding tax sticks in your moral craw, then why not give the "extra" to a genuine charity of your choice (the moral alternative)?"



“Squander”!



Are you being pejorative in order to justify “avoidance of tax” on income earned at the expense and support of the society in general?

(The support of which enables one to “earn” one’s income with a reasonable degree of personal “security”.)


Fortunately, one is just a speck in the society which supports one. At the end of the day, you are more dependent on it for survival, than society is on you.

But, how you support it (taxation) also effects how it supports you.

Are you the best judge of how the “tax” should be used?

Utilising charities to clean ones "soul" of a social responsibility, which “should” be accepted, does not seem a satisfactory route.


You seem to hold to the following belief:

“I am free, no matter what rules surround me. If I find them tolerable, I tolerate them; if I find them too obnoxious, I break them. I am free because I know that I alone am morally responsible for everything I do.”

― Robert A. Heinlein



There is a price for everything and anarchy is one of them.


Fred1new - 11 Jun 2013 12:46 - 25961 of 81564

Manuel.

You and dreams are OK though.

“It isn't against the Law to be an idiot.”

― Cassandra Clare, Clockwork Angel


skinny - 11 Jun 2013 12:51 - 25962 of 81564

Quiz: Could you be president of Iran?

goldfinger - 11 Jun 2013 12:53 - 25963 of 81564

Cynic, shut up and pay your taxes like I do and 90% of the rest of the population.

facts.........

1.Just 2% of the total welfare budget is attributable to unemployed and sick.

2.Welfare slippage is just £3 billion, £1 billion claimant fraud, £2 billion Civil Service error

3. Tax avoidance in the range of £5 billion to £7 billion,

4. Tax evasion £70 billion to £90 billion.

CONCLUSION...... robbing thieving tax dodgers (both avoiders and evaders) should pay up and stop hiding behind the morality argument.

cynic - 11 Jun 2013 12:53 - 25964 of 81564

i am more than happy to be thought an idiot ...... that way, when i occasionally do something intelligent, everyone is amazed

in your favour, i think you are merely contrary for effect - your prerogative; and it's not immoral either! - whereas i am more than glad to see that that nasty specimen Village Idiot has seemingly been sent to the gulag (or worse), and legally!

cynic - 11 Jun 2013 12:58 - 25965 of 81564

hey sticky - go wash your mouth out! .... of course i pay my tax, but have taken some modest avoidance - e.g. pension scheme etc - as i am sure you have too .....

however, it's a shame that the other side of the coin (HMRC VAT) is not quite so eager to admit error and lack of application of their own rules ..... like Lloyds, they clearly work on the principle that if they never reply, the plaintiff will eventually give up (no chance!)

goldfinger - 11 Jun 2013 13:12 - 25966 of 81564

Nope paid the full 50% and now 45%.

And proud to pay it and help my country.

Fred1new - 11 Jun 2013 13:14 - 25967 of 81564

Cynic,

i am more than happy to be thought an idiot ...... that way, when i occasionally do something intelligent, everyone is amazed


I know the feeling and the response.

But it is nice to know my grandson still looks up to me.


------------------------


He is still a foot shorter.

aldwickk - 11 Jun 2013 13:15 - 25968 of 81564

How much of it goes to help this country ?
Register now or login to post to this thread.