Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

stanelco .......a new thread (SEO)     

bosley - 20 Feb 2004 09:34

Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&SiChart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&Si

for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm


hewittalan6 - 06 Mar 2008 10:38 - 25987 of 27111

Whoo-hooo,
0.1p here we come again!!!!

*Please remember the value of shares can fall as well as plummet.

XSTEFFX - 06 Mar 2008 10:45 - 25988 of 27111




PATISEAR - 05 Mar 2008 20:19 - 25951 of 25987
At the risk of upsetting some people, I will make a prediction for tomorrow.
If at market opening time tomorrow, we do not have an RNS from SEO, then I expect the SP to rise to possibly 1.12p to get the punters in/hooked, then because there is still no justifiable reason for 400%+ rise, for the Sp to drop back to sub .85p which will trigger 'Stops'. This could cause punters to lock in what gains they may have.
In reality, all we have is, we know the Results are in the next two weeks {14 March} and 'that fanfare' RNS. NOTHING MORE.
I am very happy with my profits and wish you all well in your investments.
I have watched very closely all the trades, and today's afternoon was the slowest period in the last five days. They were barley trading 2mil an hour up to 16.00pm.
This leads me to believe the 'Brokers' are short of shares, and the best way to get them is to trigger 'stops'.
This is just my opinion and I hope it does not upset anyone.
GL.
THANK YOU VERY MUST. YOUR ON MY BOOK.

XSTEFFX - 06 Mar 2008 10:49 - 25989 of 27111

SOLD AT 1.15 NOW 0.73 TO SELL. PATISEAR YOU ARE MY HELLO.

cynic - 06 Mar 2008 10:52 - 25990 of 27111

alan .... you are sounding more and more like me

required field - 06 Mar 2008 10:52 - 25991 of 27111

Bubble burst...never met a stock like it !

hewittalan6 - 06 Mar 2008 10:57 - 25992 of 27111

cynic.....I do try to emulate you!!!
I take sharedealing very philosophically though.
I win some, I lose others, but it's only money. Bits of paper with the queens ugly mug on it.
Sometimes a share like this can be worth the loss just for the entertainment and education value, and in the end, I'm winning on the whole.
Speaking of education. Why does the bid/offer keep reversing? Sometimes quite alarmingly. As I write this its 1p vs 0.8p, but the wrong way around!!!

garyble - 06 Mar 2008 10:58 - 25993 of 27111

224m volume already today...stop-losses and profit-takers combined with the bewildered and dumbfounded me thinks!

If nothing else, its a taste of what could/will happen when some decent news is released!

XSTEFFX - 06 Mar 2008 11:00 - 25994 of 27111

ITS MAD 1P V 0.8. NOW 0.95 V0.95.

halifax - 06 Mar 2008 11:02 - 25995 of 27111

Is there a risk of suspension due to these wild fluctuations?

hewittalan6 - 06 Mar 2008 11:04 - 25996 of 27111

I agree the management should be hung, if thats what you mean ;-)

hewittalan6 - 06 Mar 2008 11:09 - 25997 of 27111

Just noticed that when the spread reverses, or equals, it is followed by an uncrossing trade.
I'm not certain what an uncrossing trade is or how it works, but think it is a counterparty sale on the MM's. If so, this lends weight (I think) to Patisears prediction and rationale. I think. Perhaps. Maybe.
God alone knows.

kimoldfield - 06 Mar 2008 11:11 - 25998 of 27111

With depth of Buys at 12 3,455,477 and Sells 52 33,022,188 we could well see another dip, whether temporary or not remains to be seen.

cynic - 06 Mar 2008 11:13 - 25999 of 27111

everyone seemed very keen to talk % the other day ...... am i therefore right in thinking sp has dropped something like 30% this morning ...... bugger all in true monetary terms of course

PATISEAR - 06 Mar 2008 11:14 - 26000 of 27111

XSTEFFX

Glad you made a profit.
I'm waiting for the SP to go sub .80p. and depending how it gets there {might even wait for sub .70p} will top up another 1mil.

hewittalan6 - 06 Mar 2008 11:16 - 26001 of 27111

Nope, cynic, about 12% at the mo, but it could be anything in the next minute!!!
Anyway, if you stick a grand in a stock and lose 12%, its 120 gone, whether you buy at 1p or 10.

cynic - 06 Mar 2008 11:24 - 26002 of 27111

don't disagree, but getting excited about % can be very misleading indeed, especially if one "forgets" to take into account dealing charges and the spread, which looks to be about 7.5% here

of course, sp is arguably down about 30% from its high today!

hewittalan6 - 06 Mar 2008 11:30 - 26003 of 27111

Losing the logic here.
The dealing charges are a flat fee, so that applies to all stock.
According to what you say, a rise in the SP of 10% would be irrelevant, as it is a small SP, but a 10% spread would be very relevant.
Surely you can't have it both ways?

Of course, SP is arguably up 100's of %, depending on where you draw the start line. To draw it at todays high seems somewhat arbritury.

PATISEAR - 06 Mar 2008 11:34 - 26004 of 27111

In the half hour prior to 'the drop', trades were pitiful, about two+ million.
The first two hours saw nearly 200 million shares traded.
Over the past 5 days, I believe most shares traded came from the Brokers stash.{As most were buys}
They need more SEO shares for next week {results on 14th} when it will be in fever pitch[greed, lovley greed].
Over 283 million SEO shares traded so far today.
High % on Plusmarkets today was 17%.

cynic - 06 Mar 2008 11:34 - 26005 of 27111

i am only teasing of course ..... in fact, if dealing charges are a flat fee (rather than % of value!), then they are disproportionately high (in % terms) per share when dealing with joke-value stocks ... certainly spreads are a very different matter, and in top-stocks, that can be very low indeed - e.g. <2%

hewittalan6 - 06 Mar 2008 11:38 - 26006 of 27111

Agree that spreads are significant, of course they are, and are often a good indicator of coming movements. But there is no disproportion in the dealing costs. If I buy a grand of stock, it costs me 12.50 (or thereabouts). This is 1.25% of my stake, regardless of the stock concerned. It only becomes disproportionate when the amount invested changes. On 100 stuck in, its 12.5%, on 10 grand its 0.125%. The SP is irrelevant.
Register now or login to post to this thread.