Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.
  • Page:
  • 1
  • 2

[Maintenance] Unexpected outage - 26th July 2005 @ 16:35 (DOWN)     

TullettJ (MoneyAM) - 26 Jul 2005 17:33

Hello,

We experienced a small outage just after close due to a partial hardware failure.

As the failure was only partial we weren't able to switch that unit over to its backup which meant the site had to go down in order for us to fix it - a situation that isn't ideal.

I'll be working on ways to recover more quickly in the event of another partial outage during the rest of this week.

If you have any questions regarding this, please post below and I'll do my best to answer them.

J.

Treblewide - 26 Jul 2005 23:30 - 26 of 35

paid peanuts my bum.....

STORMCALLER - 26 Jul 2005 23:52 - 27 of 35

Sad but true I am afraid, but at least it hasn't made me bitter and twisted......That was something else....lol

MightyMicro - 27 Jul 2005 00:32 - 28 of 35

So, to sum up this thread so far, I've got to apply a claw hammer to Treb's ginge nuts in order to qualify for a threesome with Choccie and Julie as I'm a techie that might have had something to do with all this once upon a time providing I can confirm that Jon is an overpaid twat as well?

Is that right? Do I get a prize?

Seymour Clearly - 27 Jul 2005 00:56 - 29 of 35

Whatever gave you that impression?

chocolat - 27 Jul 2005 01:02 - 30 of 35

Oh I should think so MM.

I'd have liked to have contested Mcpeanuts' remarks about frightening the neighbours.
The only problem is that Jules' Shitzus are now just plain Zus.

bhunt1910 - 27 Jul 2005 08:00 - 31 of 35

Well as a previous technical director for a FTSE 50 insurance company with 10,000 users dependent on my mainframe services - I was allowed 1 service interrupt in 12 months, 2 was unacceptable and I would have lost my job.

On the whole I think MAM do a reasonable job in maintainng service levels - cos I understand how difficult it is to keep a service up and running - especially when dependent on others.

However - you do need to test those service recovery plans regularly and make sure that those contingency plans work - otherwise you will get fair criticism.

Baza

TullettJ (MoneyAM) - 27 Jul 2005 08:09 - 32 of 35

bhunt1910,

A very fair comment!

It's only very rarely that we have any kind of hardware failure (I can think of 3 instances since launch, of which 2 caused any kind of outage during the trading day), and the more frequent problems do seem to revolve around our feed.

With regards to our feed, we are working together with our suppliers to increase our resiliance to problems, but as you'd understand, these things can't be done immediately - and there's a number of stages involved in this process.

J.

DocProc - 27 Jul 2005 10:07 - 33 of 35

Rumour has it, that underneath her clothes, choccy is naked all the time.

Hmmm?

Rule 7: Just going to the toilet. Back in a minute.

loadsadosh - 27 Jul 2005 12:08 - 34 of 35

WHAT OUTAGE??

Loadsa

MightyMicro - 27 Jul 2005 12:09 - 35 of 35

DocProc: I thought that was Billy Connoly's Rule 3 for the over 60s ;-)
  • Page:
  • 1
  • 2
Register now or login to post to this thread.